News
news Did Radar Detect A UFO Before Loss Of MH370?
news Study: Y chromosome appeared 180 million years ago
news BU School of Public Health:Alarm Bells for E-Cigarettes Premature and Misguided
news UN considering sanctions over South Sudan massacre
news New Mexico pharmacists to prescribe anti-overdose drug
news Accident could revolutionize energy storage
news Insects Discovered With Reversed Sexual Organs
news FCC to Propose New and Weak 'Net Neutrality' Rules
news Major Biological Discovery…Inside the Chernobyl Reactor??
news Cow-milking robots make farmers, animals happier
news Dutch scramble jets after Russian bombers approach

Advertisement



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 19 Votes - 3.32 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
11:11
Evil Silvertard
User ID: 113992
12-24-2012 11:43 AM

Posts: 15,811



Post: #1
100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
Advertisement
Look closely at this article from shortly after the shooting:

[Image: A182_50D820BC.jpg]


Other than always knowing an anonymous source (in these cases) is part of the conspiracy, I would have NEVER caught what this writer says:

Who exactly is this ‘law enforcement official’ that has access to the premier news agency in the country, and on behalf of which state agency does he/she work for?

How did they even know at this point that Ryan had a younger 20-year-old brother when there are no public records of Adam Lanza since 2009 and the two brothers had not seen each other since 2010, as claimed by Ryan? How could they have known on Friday morning that Ryan had a girlfriend and that she and another friend were missing in New Jersey? How did they even know that Ryan had any connection to New Jersey at all? The Lanzas’ mother was dead at this point and their father only found out later through a reporter asking him about Adam, who had by then become the ‘lone gunman’ in the official narrative.

[...]

The only logical conclusion I can draw at this stage is that somebody or some group with high-level media access had FOREKNOWLEDGE of the crime, foreknowledge that is revealed by their ‘anonymously’ leaking to the press things which they could not otherwise have known, foreknowledge that exposes their hand in originally planning to use both Lanza brothers as patsies.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/21/...knowledge/

He's right! At that point, all LE allegedly knew was that they had a dead young man, whom they believed to be the shooter, with ID saying he was Ryan Lanza, 24 years old. There is NO WAY they would know anything about a brother, especially a YOUNGER brother; no way they would know anything about Ryan having a girlfriend in New Jersey, and no way they would have any information about her and a friend being 'missing'.

Remember they also said they had a dead body in New Jersey and that Mr Lanza (the dad) had been found murdered. It is obvious they planned on framing Ryan and killing him, just like they did his little brother, and killing their father, as well.

THIS IS THE SMOKING GUN.

We have it in our power to begin the world over again. ~ Thomas Paine
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement

LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 134850
12-24-2012 11:55 AM

 



Post: #2
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
Bump

bump for clarity and posterity
Quote this message in a reply
Axel
No shit, Sherlock!
User ID: 142042
12-24-2012 11:56 AM

Posts: 5,851



Post: #3
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
1 star

Because every shooting massacre is claimed a false flag op by the right wingers & lunatic fringe - to distract from the real issue - that gun massacres are largely due to a combination of gun obsession, constant fear and hate mongering and extreme paranoia.

FYI, I posses guns, without being obsessed by them.


Fear is the lengthened shadow of ignorance.
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2012 11:58 AM by Axel.) Quote this message in a reply
11:11
Evil Silvertard
User ID: 113992
12-24-2012 12:01 PM

Posts: 15,811



Post: #4
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
TOC  Wrote: (12-24-2012 11:56 AM)
1 star

Because every shooting massacre lately has been claimed a false flag op by the right wingers & lunatic fringe - to distract from the real issue - that gun massacres are largely due to a combination of gun obsession, constant fear and hate mongering and extreme paranoia.

FYI, I posses guns, without being obsessed by them.

STFU you dishonest shill. An innocent kid was framed and murdered, along with his mother, and they were aiming for his brother, too. That you have no regard for the truth shows what a piece of shit you are. You're willing to allow MASS MURDER, and for innocent people to be blamed, to accomplish your team's agenda. f*ck you.

We have it in our power to begin the world over again. ~ Thomas Paine
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2012 12:15 PM by 11:11.) Quote this message in a reply
Navion2
Alta Tijuana
User ID: 142045
12-24-2012 12:03 PM

Posts: 1,390



Post: #5
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
5 stars

Sandy Hook -USA = Port Arthur - Australia
Quote this message in a reply
11:11
Evil Silvertard
User ID: 113992
12-24-2012 12:17 PM

Posts: 15,811



Post: #6
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
Navion2  Wrote: (12-24-2012 12:03 PM)
5 stars

Sandy Hook -USA = Port Arthur - Australia

Yup.

The guy who wrote the article linked in the OP is very sharp. I've read so much and caught lots of lies, but I would have missed that due to the sheer volume of the bullshit. He just busted this thing wide open. Now, we all need to repost that ALL OVER the web so everyone is aware.

We have it in our power to begin the world over again. ~ Thomas Paine
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2012 12:18 PM by 11:11.) Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 140842
12-24-2012 12:25 PM

 



Post: #7
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
this victoria soto RIP page is dated 2010. Someone called the page owner out, and he/she said they made the page in 2010 but did not publish it. Only after the incident did they make it for VS and open it to the public.


I do not FB, so can anyone verify if this is possible? why would someone make a FB page and not publish it? Seems like that would defeat the purpose of it?

Ace find OP!!

We are in a whole lot of trouble people. We are dealing with absolute madmen and their malevolent machinations.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kPTkODcLXA
Quote this message in a reply
evo
Registered User
User ID: 108944
12-24-2012 12:28 PM

Posts: 4,601



Post: #8
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
Seriously, why is it that whenever anyone types the phrase "100% proof of X" that it is always the farthest thing away from proof of X?

[Image: evo-1.png]
Quote this message in a reply
11:11
Evil Silvertard
User ID: 113992
12-24-2012 12:31 PM

Posts: 15,811



Post: #9
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
This is from a previous article, the guy in the OP wrote:

Ryan Lanza was actually at work in Hoboken, New Jersey, that morning when his name and photo began circulating in the media. And so, for most of Friday, the ‘lone shooter’ was erroneously reported as “Ryan Lanza, confirmed dead.” At the same time, we were being told that Ryan’s girlfriend and a room-mate were reported missing, also from Hoboken, New Jersey.

So this isn’t just a case of mistaken identity, as later claimed when it was suggested that Adam had a piece of identification belonging to his brother on his person. Not one, but BOTH Lanza brothers were being placed by ‘law enforcement officials’ at the scene of the shooting. It could be that Ryan’s quick reflexes to leave his workplace to get on a bus to go back to his apartment while protesting innocence via his Facebook page may have saved his life.

[...]

What it’s starting to look like is that the Lanzas were framed for this mass shooting in advance. Long before any suspects were named, and even as we were being told that Nancy Lanza was among the dead at the school, we were told that police were investigating a murder in … Hoboken, New Jersey, where a body had been found at the home of … Ryan Lanza! An older “confirmed” version of events had RYAN, not Adam, travelling to Hoboken that morning to murder his father before going to the school in Newtown, Connecticut. Other variants had Ryan OR Adam going to both their divorced parents’ homes and killing them before going to the school.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/20/...f-control/

Again, this guy is right. If Ryan had not learned of the shooting so quickly, I think he would have been murdered and made part of the shooting narrative.

I really hope that he and his father are safe, wherever they are (and where are they?).

We have it in our power to begin the world over again. ~ Thomas Paine
Quote this message in a reply
The Evil AC
I am not a number!!!
User ID: 666
12-24-2012 12:31 PM

 



Post: #10
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
[Image: 04A3_50D82F0E.jpg]
Quote this message in a reply
11:11
Evil Silvertard
User ID: 113992
12-24-2012 12:34 PM

Posts: 15,811



Post: #11
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
evo  Wrote: (12-24-2012 12:28 PM)
Seriously, why is it that whenever anyone types the phrase "100% proof of X" that it is always the farthest thing away from proof of X?

Perhaps you would like tell everyone how the anonymous LE source knew that the presumed dead killer, "Ryan Lanza" had a younger brother and a 'missing' girlfriend in another state.

Waiting...

We have it in our power to begin the world over again. ~ Thomas Paine
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 131708
12-24-2012 12:35 PM

 



Post: #12
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
Bump
Quote this message in a reply
Axel
No shit, Sherlock!
User ID: 142042
12-24-2012 12:37 PM

Posts: 5,851



Post: #13
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
11:11  Wrote: (12-24-2012 12:01 PM)
TOC  Wrote: (12-24-2012 11:56 AM)
1 star

Because every shooting massacre lately has been claimed a false flag op by the right wingers & lunatic fringe - to distract from the real issue - that gun massacres are largely due to a combination of gun obsession, constant fear and hate mongering and extreme paranoia.

FYI, I posses guns, without being obsessed by them.

STFU you dishonest shill. An innocent kid was framed and murdered, along with his mother, and they were aiming for his brother, too. That you have no regard for the truth shows what a piece of shit you are. You're willing to allow MASS MURDER, and for innocent people to be blamed, to accomplish your team's agenda. f*ck you.

If anyone here's a shill, then it's you, OP. You're trying to distract from the real issue - the usual NRA damage control. Was there any mass shooting that wasn't declared a false flag op recently? This is getting really old;

The claimed "100% proof" is anything but that. Confused initial information on the shooting rather prove there wasn't any foreknowledge - else LE would come up with a coherent narrative from the get go.


Fear is the lengthened shadow of ignorance.
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2012 12:49 PM by Axel.) Quote this message in a reply
Richard Eldritch
Hussar!
User ID: 138201
12-24-2012 12:37 PM

Posts: 38,137



Post: #14
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
Naaaaah, Butthrut gun nut brought up my a Prepper mum, sounds like a recipe for disaster....
The trouble is, conspiracy types understand neither the nature of coincidence nor the frequency of cock ups.
Coincidence + Cock Up = Conspiracy.

Hussar!
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2012 12:37 PM by Richard Eldritch.) Quote this message in a reply
evo
Registered User
User ID: 108944
12-24-2012 12:38 PM

Posts: 4,601



Post: #15
RE: 100% proof of foreknowledge/conspiracy at Sandy Hook
You have given nothing but conjecture. You haven't said why they wouldn't know what they knew, just that they wouldn't.
What time was that article even posted. It could have been hours after the shooting when more was known.

Calling simple opinions and conjecture "100% proof" is idiotic and shows a clear misunderstanding of what proof is.

[Image: evo-1.png]
Quote this message in a reply












Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1