News

**Mrpatriot**

http://www.designed-perception.com/religion.html

**Shakey1** · **Shakey1** Subscriber User ID: 78542 04-29-2012 01:07 PM **Posts: 11,983**

This guy's pretty safe from my coveting Jhikpghf

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 14880 04-29-2012 02:02 PM

Nor his slaves and his ass and his ox?
Yeah, so, God has no problem with man being slaves of man or f*cking goats.
I guess you can f*ck an ass, as long as it is not your neighbours.

**Karu**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Nor his slaves and his ass and his ox?
Yeah, so, God has no problem with man being slaves of man or f*cking goats.
I guess you can f*ck an ass, as long as it is not your neighbours.

Todays translation of slave would be "employee". It says nothing about sex with a goat, you're not supposed to want what someone else has. Another words, if you want to own a goat, (or anything else that appeals to you) go buy your own. Otherwise that envy might turn to theft. Understand?

**czygyny**

Karu Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
Nor his slaves and his ass and his ox?
Yeah, so, God has no problem with man being slaves of man or f*cking goats.
I guess you can f*ck an ass, as long as it is not your neighbours.

Todays translation of slave would be "employee". It says nothing about sex with a goat, you're not supposed to want what someone else has. Another words, if you want to own a goat, (or anything else that appeals to you) go buy your own. Otherwise that envy might turn to theft. Understand?

Yep. It goes hand-in-hand with the command 'thou shalt not steal'.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 92821 04-29-2012 06:04 PM

All Christians should leave this godless forum behind.

Just sayin...

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 77388 04-29-2012 06:25 PM

Karu Wrote:

Todays translation of slave would be "employee".

Bullshit.

Today's translation would still be 'slave', all your transparent rationalizations and unconvincing excuses aside.

In Numbers 31, your god ordered the murder of babies male children, then goes on to say that they should keep the virgin girl-children as slaves for themselves.

Would that translate as 'employees' too? What were they employed at, creepy sex slaves of a murderous, amoral gang of pedophile demon worshippers?

Jptdknpa

Employees! (snort!)

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 77388 04-29-2012 06:31 PM

czygyny Wrote:

Yep. It goes hand-in-hand with the command 'thou shalt not steal'.

Seems like a real waste of time.

Why not just roll it into one Handy Commandy and say, "Don't allow envy in your heart lest it turn into theft" ?

Would the Nine Commandments not be as imposing or what?

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 46368 04-29-2012 06:39 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

All Christians should leave this godless forum behind.

Just sayin...

this is an open forum....all are welcome.....leave your hatered at the curb

**czygyny** · (This post was last modified: 04-29-2012 06:51 PM by czygyny.)

LoP Guest Wrote:

czygyny Wrote:
Yep. It goes hand-in-hand with the command 'thou shalt not steal'.

Seems like a real waste of time.

Why not just roll it into one Handy Commandy and say, "Don't allow envy in your heart lest it turn into theft" ?

Would the Nine Commandments not be as imposing or what?

I didn't write it. I would have worded it all a bit differently, myself, but that's just the way it was penned.

As well, some people seem to need every little nit-picking nuance of a rule spelled out for them so they can't find a work-around.

Envy and covetness are really two different things, anyway. You can be jealous of a person's relationship with another person, envy a person's wealth and position but you covet, or desire to possess, his personal belongings.

It starts as a thought, dwells in the heart, then grows into an action.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 77388 04-29-2012 06:57 PM

czygyny Wrote:

I didn't write it. I would have worded it all a bit differently, myself, but that's just the way it was penned.

What difference does that make? You assume 'God' issued this commandment. This is an assumption I do not share; pointing out the inherent silliness of the Commandments only serves to undermine the position that they were authored by a Morally superior entity whom you choose to worship.

This is the same entity who countenances slavery in these Commandments we are supposed to be living by.

This is the same God who commanded the murder of babies and the enslavement of girl-children.

That's the real nub of the issue.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 93078 04-29-2012 07:06 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

Nor his slaves and his ass and his ox?
Yeah, so, God has no problem with man being slaves of man or f*cking goats.
I guess you can f*ck an ass, as long as it is not your neighbours.

Just the semitic "god"; the True Creator gave freedom to ALL.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 93078 04-29-2012 07:08 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

czygyny Wrote:
I didn't write it. I would have worded it all a bit differently, myself, but that's just the way it was penned.

What difference does that make? You assume 'God' issued this commandment. This is an assumption I do not share; pointing out the inherent silliness of the Commandments only serves to undermine the position that they were authored by a Morally superior entity whom you choose to worship.

This is the same entity who countenances slavery in these Commandments we are supposed to be living by.

This is the same God who commanded the murder of babies and the enslavement of girl-children.

That's the real nub of the issue.

That's NOT THE CREATOR.

That is the Jew's false "god" who they use to justify their genocide and wrote the book to back it up.

envy? Thief? Lol.

Judge not.
Love your neighbour.
Dismus the good thief.
what does wife mean? Connotational differences occur given milleniums passage and erroneus transliterational ideaological sentiment.

Annullment. Its a word. Look it up oh ye of self righteous indignation.

10th commandment was about PROPERTY.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 77388 04-29-2012 07:12 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

That's NOT THE CREATOR.

Yeah, tha's kinda the point I'me making. chuckle