LoP Guest  Wrote:

so this means there is something to the mayan prophecies.

Bingo! We have a winner!

Diana Highnight  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

so this means there is something to the mayan prophecies.

Bingo! We have a winner!

one of the main points of the detractors is that there is 'nothing to too crossing the galactic center' - i guess they have not read this article.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Diana Highnight  Wrote:

Bingo! We have a winner!

one of the main points of the detractors is that there is 'nothing to too crossing the galactic center' - i guess they have not read this article.

Oscillations also happen when galaxies collide...so look at where.

There's many factors at play and I sure don't know them all but I suspect magnetics when we cross is a big one, and space conditions in different places around the wheel, differing in their gaseous makeup, would play a part. I also wonder if there aren't some points around the milky way wheel that the galactic center doesn't vent out, like a big shop vac.

Diana Highnight  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

so this means there is something to the mayan prophecies.

Bingo! We have a winner!

one of the main points of the detractors is that there is 'nothing to too crossing the galactic center' - i guess they have not read this article.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

one of the main points of the detractors is that there is 'nothing to too crossing the galactic center' - i guess they have not read this article.

Oscillations also happen when galaxies collide...so look at where.

There's many factors at play and I sure don't know them all but I suspect magnetics when we cross is a big one, and space conditions in different places around the wheel, differing in their gaseous makeup, would play a part. I also wonder if there aren't some points around the milky way wheel that the galactic center doesn't vent out, like a big shop vac.

hasnt it been 'decided' by the physicists that a black hole is at the center of our galaxy....hmmmm.....

LoP Guest  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Oscillations also happen when galaxies collide...so look at where.

There's many factors at play and I sure don't know them all but I suspect magnetics when we cross is a big one, and space conditions in different places around the wheel, differing in their gaseous makeup, would play a part. I also wonder if there aren't some points around the milky way wheel that the galactic center doesn't vent out, like a big shop vac.

hasnt it been 'decided' by the physicists that a black hole is at the center of our galaxy....hmmmm.....

Yeah. What part of what I'm saying aren't you understanding?

We have periodic and perhaps cyclic core bursts at around 12, 250-12,300 yrs; something in that range, according to LaViolette.

Now if you can figure out why we have a periodic laying down of strontium, irridium, and other space elements in the ice core records then you win the cookie.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Oscillations also happen when galaxies collide...so look at where.

There's many factors at play and I sure don't know them all but I suspect magnetics when we cross is a big one, and space conditions in different places around the wheel, differing in their gaseous makeup, would play a part. I also wonder if there aren't some points around the milky way wheel that the galactic center doesn't vent out, like a big shop vac.

hasnt it been 'decided' by the physicists that a black hole is at the center of our galaxy....hmmmm.....

Yeah. What part of what I'm saying aren't you understanding?

We have periodic and perhaps cyclic core bursts at around 12, 250-12,300 yrs; something in that range, according to LaViolette.

Now if you can figure out why we have a periodic laying down of strontium, irridium, and other space elements in the ice core records then you win the cookie.

BeelzeBob  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

I am more concerned about the IP Tracker than the mass extinction possibility at the moment. Whats that all about?

If men in dark suits show up at your door, get out the back door as quickly as possible and don't look back.....

Actually, I would like to know a little more about it and the name of anti-virus routine for it.

nah, they hardly ever "knock" anymore... they will just gang stalk you or harass you or send someone out to take pictures of your place or spray chemtrails to cause tornadoes to level your town... you know stuff that can't be pinned on them directly...

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Diana Highnight  Wrote:

Bingo! We have a winner!

one of the main points of the detractors is that there is 'nothing to too crossing the galactic center' - i guess they have not read this article.

This theory was first brought to my attention by these guys a couple years ago:

http://www.thehorizonproject.com/

I'm not completely sure about them, they seem to be interested in selling DVD's but their theory sounded like it was worth investigating.

This is a quick video claiming their hypothesis. Take it for what you will...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s689wjbpkuQ

The only difference between what they are saying and what the scientists are saying is thousands of years versus millions. That's why I wonder if the "millions" of years is the false information.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Diana Highnight  Wrote:

Bingo! We have a winner!

one of the main points of the detractors is that there is 'nothing to too crossing the galactic center' - i guess they have not read this article.

This theory was first brought to my attention by these guys a couple years ago:

http://www.thehorizonproject.com/

I'm not completely sure about them, they seem to be interested in selling DVD's but their theory sounded like it was worth investigating.

This is a quick video claiming their hypothesis. Take it for what you will...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s689wjbpkuQ

The only difference between what they are saying and what the scientists are saying is thousands of years versus millions. That's why I wonder if the "millions" of years is the false information.

Skippy  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

one of the main points of the detractors is that there is 'nothing to too crossing the galactic center' - i guess they have not read this article.

This theory was first brought to my attention by these guys a couple years ago:

http://www.thehorizonproject.com/

I'm not completely sure about them, they seem to be interested in selling DVD's but their theory sounded like it was worth investigating.

This is a quick video claiming their hypothesis. Take it for what you will...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s689wjbpkuQ

The only difference between what they are saying and what the scientists are saying is thousands of years versus millions. That's why I wonder if the "millions" of years is the false information.

They try to make things fit their pole shift ideal.

That video is good for showing our solar system's up and down path around the milky way. Great visual.

I think the better question is why we haven't stabilized into a steady and straight orbit since we left Sag Deg and were captured by the Milky Way. I think there's an attraction/repulsion magnetic thing going on that pulls us to the galactic plane then propels us out again, only to be pulled back in again to keep repeating it.

Other systems don't bob.

We're abnormal.

Did the ancients warn us of pole shifts? Not really. Plato tells how the Egyptians tell of periodic destructions of fire and water, alternating. The water is easy to figure out - the earth slows considerably at some point in the up and down bobbing and the water keeps going and the oceans flood up and over the lands briefly, then recede as earth picks up speed again. The fire cycle - not so easy to discern, it could be any number of things from massive galactic core bursts pushing megadust into the sun to melting permafrost and under-ocean heating leading to massive methane releases catching fire from lightning.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

hasnt it been 'decided' by the physicists that a black hole is at the center of our galaxy....hmmmm.....

Yeah. What part of what I'm saying aren't you understanding?

We have periodic and perhaps cyclic core bursts at around 12, 250-12,300 yrs; something in that range, according to LaViolette.

Now if you can figure out why we have a periodic laying down of strontium, irridium, and other space elements in the ice core records then you win the cookie.

Would the remains of relatively recent supernovas in the vicinity of the galactic plane combined with this theory in the OP, get me a cookie?

Diana Highnight  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Yeah. What part of what I'm saying aren't you understanding?

We have periodic and perhaps cyclic core bursts at around 12, 250-12,300 yrs; something in that range, according to LaViolette.

Now if you can figure out why we have a periodic laying down of strontium, irridium, and other space elements in the ice core records then you win the cookie.

Would the remains of relatively recent supernovas in the vicinity of the galactic plane combined with this theory in the OP, get me a cookie?

I don't know. If there were one it would be at a single point around the 240 million year orbit around the milky way. For the egyptians to tell us of cyclical fire and water disasters that probably wouldn't be it unless we want to believe they've been around for many trips around the 240 million year wheel, which obviously they haven't. Halfway back around we got flowering plants, I doubt humanity is that old.

We have cyclic dooms and oddball dooms. Your cookie would be for an oddball doom.

(was that understandable? I can see it in my head but not so hot at explaining what I'm visualizing)

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Skippy  Wrote:

This theory was first brought to my attention by these guys a couple years ago:

http://www.thehorizonproject.com/

I'm not completely sure about them, they seem to be interested in selling DVD's but their theory sounded like it was worth investigating.

This is a quick video claiming their hypothesis. Take it for what you will...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s689wjbpkuQ

The only difference between what they are saying and what the scientists are saying is thousands of years versus millions. That's why I wonder if the "millions" of years is the false information.

They try to make things fit their pole shift ideal.

That video is good for showing our solar system's up and down path around the milky way. Great visual.

I think the better question is why we haven't stabilized into a steady and straight orbit since we left Sag Deg and were captured by the Milky Way. I think there's an attraction/repulsion magnetic thing going on that pulls us to the galactic plane then propels us out again, only to be pulled back in again to keep repeating it.

Other systems don't bob.

We're abnormal.

Did the ancients warn us of pole shifts? Not really. Plato tells how the Egyptians tell of periodic destructions of fire and water, alternating. The water is easy to figure out - the earth slows considerably at some point in the up and down bobbing and the water keeps going and the oceans flood up and over the lands briefly, then recede as earth picks up speed again. The fire cycle - not so easy to discern, it could be any number of things from massive galactic core bursts pushing megadust into the sun to melting permafrost and under-ocean heating leading to massive methane releases catching fire from lightning.

Could be as simple as when solar max meets magnetic min, due to dense plasma at the plane...

LoP Guest  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

hasnt it been 'decided' by the physicists that a black hole is at the center of our galaxy....hmmmm.....

Yeah. What part of what I'm saying aren't you understanding?

We have periodic and perhaps cyclic core bursts at around 12, 250-12,300 yrs; something in that range, according to LaViolette.

Now if you can figure out why we have a periodic laying down of strontium, irridium, and other space elements in the ice core records then you win the cookie.

Would the remains of relatively recent supernovas in the vicinity of the galactic plane combined with this theory in the OP, get me a cookie?