News

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 85416 04-15-2012 11:39 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

This shows the gov. are doing all they can to avoid panic.They want us to work and pay taxes until we die.Same with satelitte /space probe croped images,solar flares, asteroids, manipulated data; I was thinking many times at the "Deep Impact" and many other doom movies ; the scenario is very realistic;they won't inform the large population in time , can't save 7 bilion humans;maybe even the Vatican doesn't trust them and built their own observatory.
"Therefore watch"...

They are DEFINITELY MANIPULATING SOLAR DATA!

I was watching the sun and graphs before the Indonesia quake the other day, then as soon as it happened they backtracked and changed some of the data from dead calm to as if it had been building up to the quake.

All these SENIOR politicians resigning (the ones that actually run shit and arent the puppets on tv), and wanting to "spend time with their families", just like in "Deep Impact".... almost word for word:

"THE most notorious of the "faceless men'', Mark Arbib, has quit Parliament to help heal wounds in the party he helped inflict.

Mr Arbib also said this afternoon he wanted to spend more time to be with his family after a deal struck 10 years ago with his wife."

Labor's 'faceless man' Mark Arbib quits politics
http://www.news.com.au/national/labors-f...6283095979

Cheer

**Bicnarok**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Alternative Earthquake mash up link:

http://www.oe-files.de/gmaps/eqmashup.html

Friggin hell there´s loads of earthquake markers near Singapore, Mental note:- definetly don´t wanna go on the beach anywere there in the future

Pi Infinity User ID: 3.14159265 04-16-2012 12:16 AM

Johntaraz Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
I don't understand - if they want to hide them from us, why don't they turn the sensors off?
I am guessing they still want to know, but would rather we didn't.

Anyone know how far North and the general location that the New Madrid Fault runs in Canada?

there are reasons

why some things must be before all

i did not write those rules

you have all read it here before

some things,

you just have to find on your own

or remain blind

though they,

'we',

tell you

**molson**

Pi Wrote:

Johntaraz Wrote:
LoP Guest Wrote:
I don't understand - if they want to hide them from us, why don't they turn the sensors off?
I am guessing they still want to know, but would rather we didn't.

Anyone know how far North and the general location that the New Madrid Fault runs in Canada?

there are reasons

why some things must be before all

i did not write those rules

you have all read it here before

some things,

you just have to find on your own

or remain blind

though they,

'we',

tell you

Yer gettin' kinda transparent there, bro. chuckle

**Rager** lop guest User ID: 89580 04-16-2012 02:23 AM

WalkersEverywhere Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
I don't understand - if they want to hide them from us, why don't they turn the sensors off?

Because they aren't hiding anything.
There were no quakes. Sometimes, data gets corrupted, sensors convey false positives.

The reason they removed the data on the "quakes" is because it was bogus.

Sheesh.

^This

I get the USGS has been known to alter some data, but sometimes that is because they get false readings. They are getting their information from machines, machines make mistakes, ESPECIALLY when they are automatically setting off alerts. That doesn't mean there were earthquakes, things like that happen from time to time.

I also didn't understand the urgency for the pin, but sometimes I never do chuckle

**CourtDude** · (This post was last modified: 04-16-2012 03:43 AM by CourtDude.)

Rager Wrote:

WalkersEverywhere Wrote:
LoP Guest Wrote:
I don't understand - if they want to hide them from us, why don't they turn the sensors off?

Because they aren't hiding anything.
There were no quakes. Sometimes, data gets corrupted, sensors convey false positives.

The reason they removed the data on the "quakes" is because it was bogus.

Sheesh.

^This

I get the USGS has been known to alter some data, but sometimes that is because they get false readings. They are getting their information from machines, machines make mistakes, ESPECIALLY when they are automatically setting off alerts. That doesn't mean there were earthquakes, things like that happen from time to time.

I also didn't understand the urgency for the pin, but sometimes I never do

Perhaps they are tunneling in the area?

Or building an underground tunnel to nunavut ᑐᙵᓱᒋᑦᑎ <--indeed!

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 89351 04-16-2012 02:32 AM

if there were no quakes and 4 decent sized quakes showed up then i want to see a letter/memo/something from usgs explaining why the quakes were removed. it's not like only conspiracy people watch the quakes. um, scientists do as well and if everything is on the up and up then show me where they explained the removal of FOUR earthquakes. it's not like they just took off a little 1.5 or something. FOUR bigger quakes. where's the press release showing us why they did that? otherwise you're just blowing hot air. thank you.

**The Lucky AC** Everything in life is luck User ID: 888 04-16-2012 02:41 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

if there were no quakes and 4 decent sized quakes showed up then i want to see a letter/memo/something from usgs explaining why the quakes were removed. it's not like only conspiracy people watch the quakes. um, scientists do as well and if everything is on the up and up then show me where they explained the removal of FOUR earthquakes. it's not like they just took off a little 1.5 or something. FOUR bigger quakes. where's the press release showing us why they did that? otherwise you're just blowing hot air. thank you.

The only person blowing hot air is you. The only person making this a big deal is you (and the other alarmists here). Look at seismographs near the area (or check out the Yellowstone seismos) and see if you can find any other data to prove that there were indeed quakes, besides the fact there were a few that popped up.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 73885 04-16-2012 02:53 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

if there were no quakes and 4 decent sized quakes showed up then i want to see a letter/memo/something from usgs explaining why the quakes were removed. it's not like only conspiracy people watch the quakes. um, scientists do as well and if everything is on the up and up then show me where they explained the removal of FOUR earthquakes. it's not like they just took off a little 1.5 or something. FOUR bigger quakes. where's the press release showing us why they did that? otherwise you're just blowing hot air. thank you.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 73885 04-16-2012 02:54 AM

THANK YOU mods for pinning this! (Even though I'm not OP)

Heartflowers

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 89351 04-16-2012 02:55 AM

The Lucky AC Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
if there were no quakes and 4 decent sized quakes showed up then i want to see a letter/memo/something from usgs explaining why the quakes were removed. it's not like only conspiracy people watch the quakes. um, scientists do as well and if everything is on the up and up then show me where they explained the removal of FOUR earthquakes. it's not like they just took off a little 1.5 or something. FOUR bigger quakes. where's the press release showing us why they did that? otherwise you're just blowing hot air. thank you.

The only person blowing hot air is you. The only person making this a big deal is you (and the other alarmists here). Look at seismographs near the area (or check out the Yellowstone seismos) and see if you can find any other data to prove that there were indeed quakes, besides the fact there were a few that popped up.

so you don't have a link explaining why they removed the quakes? i'm asking for scientific verification. shouldn't be hard to verify that it was an error. let us know what you find. i, for one, wouldn't be totally shocked if it was an error so get us that info. you know, proof. otherwise you've got nothing and we've got lots to speculate on since, until it is scientifically explained there's no explanation. :)

who decided to remove the quakes and why? you should be able to find that out if you believe what you wrote.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 89351 04-16-2012 03:06 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

is this the same latitude as the giant hole in sweden?

Incredible Images Show Giant Sinkhole In Sweden Keeps Expanding!
http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Incredib...-Expanding

**The Lucky AC** Everything in life is luck User ID: 888 04-16-2012 03:09 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

so you don't have a link explaining why they removed the quakes? i'm asking for scientific verification. shouldn't be hard to verify that it was an error. let us know what you find. i, for one, wouldn't be totally shocked if it was an error so get us that info. you know, proof. otherwise you've got nothing and we've got lots to speculate on since, until it is scientifically explained there's no explanation. :)

who decided to remove the quakes and why? you should be able to find that out if you believe what you wrote.

Actually, YOU are the one with the questions and speculations. Email the USGS about it, frankly I could care less about this. It is such a non-issue, but I guess you would rather pay attention to this rather than things that are actually happening, things that actually can affect you.

Here's a head start for you:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/contactus/regional.php

I'm sure you think I fully trust the USGS, I don't. There are just far more important things going on in the world I am paying attention to, not worrying about whether or not a few quakes hit in a remote area.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 89351 04-16-2012 03:17 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
is this the same latitude as the giant hole in sweden?
Incredible Images Show Giant Sinkhole In Sweden Keeps Expanding!
http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Incredib...-Expanding

sinkhole latitude is 67
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs...malmberget
(scroll down for that info)

while the quakes in canada were between 60-65 latitude (each was different)
http://i1221.photobucket.com/albums/dd47...5d8d0f.png

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 90619 04-16-2012 05:56 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

This shows the gov. are doing all they can to avoid panic.They want us to work and pay taxes until we die.Same with satelitte /space probe croped images,solar flares, asteroids, manipulated data; I was thinking many times at the "Deep Impact" and many other doom movies ; the scenario is very realistic;they won't inform the large population in time , can't save 7 bilion humans;maybe even the Vatican doesn't trust them and built their own observatory.
"Therefore watch"...

Exactly, you can't save 7 billion people so why bother alerting them and cause wide spread panic? It will hit us like a theif in the night while the very, very wealthy elite and TPTB will be cozy inside their underground shelters.