|
Thread Rating:
- 9 Votes - 1.89 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Ghenghy Bring me that Tar-Tar womern! User ID: 70755 05-01-2012 06:24 AM
Posts: 3,518
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
birdie Wrote:Ghenghy Wrote:birdie Wrote:Wow, thank you for that - I have never seen that video before.
I have always thought there was a high probability of no planes due to the problems with the passengers.
But, I have never seen the problems of the video footage so well expalined before.
Oddly enough, the two big discussion boards, Simon Shack's and Phil Jayhan's, come to opposite conclusions - but they have both allowed their research to come to other totally insane ideas.
Birdie, who is Jayhan, and what is his argument with Simon Shack?
Thanks.
Jayhan has the Let's Roll forum and he refuses to even entertain the idea of there being no planes. However, IMO he has gone completely off the rails in his research, and he basically likes to claim that the towers were gutted before the event and that they were empty that day and that no one really died. Kind of undermines whatever actual good research he may have previously done if he starts making such crazy claims, if you ask me.
Shack has similar evidence of the video tampering as the OP's videos so he's a no-plane guy, but I am pretty sure he doesn't think "no one died" that day...
OK thanks.
Shack is of the opinion that a few hundred died on 9/11, and he presents evidence of that on his site. I was reading the other day that less than 300 names appeared on the SSDI. An independent search will verify this, just like the two flights that never took off that day. The government isnt very good at covering their tracks, they depend on the stupidity of the public.
I stopped reading Lets Roll years ago because IMO it was infested with shills.
|
|
|
|
birdie Registered User User ID: 14733 05-01-2012 06:57 AM
Posts: 2,440
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
Ghenghy Wrote:birdie Wrote:Ghenghy Wrote:Birdie, who is Jayhan, and what is his argument with Simon Shack?
Thanks.
Jayhan has the Let's Roll forum and he refuses to even entertain the idea of there being no planes. However, IMO he has gone completely off the rails in his research, and he basically likes to claim that the towers were gutted before the event and that they were empty that day and that no one really died. Kind of undermines whatever actual good research he may have previously done if he starts making such crazy claims, if you ask me.
Shack has similar evidence of the video tampering as the OP's videos so he's a no-plane guy, but I am pretty sure he doesn't think "no one died" that day...
OK thanks.
Shack is of the opinion that a few hundred died on 9/11, and he presents evidence of that on his site. I was reading the other day that less than 300 names appeared on the SSDI. An independent search will verify this, just like the two flights that never took off that day. The government isnt very good at covering their tracks, they depend on the stupidity of the public.
I stopped reading Lets Roll years ago because IMO it was infested with shills.
Yes, I am also of the opinion that many less died than is reported (even the plane manifests don't match the number of reported dead)but I think Jayhan goes way too far in insisting that basically NO ONE died. That's pretty absurd. He even tries to say the jumpers were fake, which is a bridge too far, IMO, as there is plenty of gory videos available of the aftermath and the firefighters reacting to the jumpers.
I think all of the 9-11 boards are infested with shills, and that even the mods of them have become half-crazy from the research and the paranoia. I once joined Shack's forum and got shit on just for making my (required) new member introduction. I was so shocked by their behavior I told them to take their membership and shove it up their ass - it wasn't worth even engaging in discussion with nutjobs like that. I then took some time to read through their "introductions" thread and discovered that I was just one of many who was instantly bounced upon introduction there. It's too bad they are THAT crazy - thye probably miss out on some good insights from people who might have valuable info, but they're too busy eating their young to notice. Sad.
|
|
|
(This post was last modified: 05-01-2012 06:58 AM by birdie.)
|
|
lilly1 Registered User User ID: 9593 05-01-2012 07:53 AM
Posts: 42
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
I understand this thread is based on bogus planes and people,but who gives a shit if its true or not. Honestly,,What truthers should focus on is not videos or pictures but common f*cking sense. 2 aluminum planes cannot pulverize three f*cking buildings made from mild steel and reinforced concrete. When you compare the weight/compound of the planes with the weigh/compound of three f*cking skyscrapers any non-retard will immediately realize how ballsy our government/elite truly is. And they still continue doing it till this day. Any time a powerful entity discloses or is pressed on aggressively advertising information = ITS A f*cking LIE
Its bullshit
For those who are "debunker sheeple" : you are f*cking dumb and deserve what's coming to you. One day your matrix gay ass bubble will pop and I hope you cry like the retarded bitches you are.
Again,,The smoking gun or the elephant in the room is not some youtube video or some documentary , its knowledge. Knowledge in construction. No one needs a degree on anything,just f*cking inform yourself on how shit is built and why. Only then would you realize how bullshit everything you think you know IS!
Sorry for the CAPS in my previous post.
|
|
|
|
Ghenghy Bring me that Tar-Tar womern! User ID: 70755 05-01-2012 07:59 AM
Posts: 3,518
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
birdie Wrote:Yes, I am also of the opinion that many less died than is reported (even the plane manifests don't match the number of reported dead)but I think Jayhan goes way too far in insisting that basically NO ONE died. That's pretty absurd. He even tries to say the jumpers were fake, which is a bridge too far, IMO, as there is plenty of gory videos available of the aftermath and the firefighters reacting to the jumpers.
I think all of the 9-11 boards are infested with shills, and that even the mods of them have become half-crazy from the research and the paranoia. I once joined Shack's forum and got shit on just for making my (required) new member introduction. I was so shocked by their behavior I told them to take their membership and shove it up their ass - it wasn't worth even engaging in discussion with nutjobs like that. I then took some time to read through their "introductions" thread and discovered that I was just one of many who was instantly bounced upon introduction there. It's too bad they are THAT crazy - thye probably miss out on some good insights from people who might have valuable info, but they're too busy eating their young to notice. Sad.
The friggin manifests didnt even have the names of the "terrorists" when they were released. They've never explained that. Just like they never explained why there are no surveliance videos from the airport, or the gates, or even a single interview with an airline employee willing to confirm there was a single terrorist on these flights! Well since two of them never took off I guess that would be difficult to pull off.
I lean more toward the Shack theory of under 300 casualties that day, but none of them were passengers, and thats a fact.
Dont know what your issue was with that "intro", I didnt have a problem and most of the ones I read were pretty generic.
|
|
|
|
Ghenghy Bring me that Tar-Tar womern! User ID: 70755 05-01-2012 08:12 AM
Posts: 3,518
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
lilly1 Wrote:I understand this thread is based on bogus planes and people,but who gives a shit if its true or not. Honestly,,What truthers should focus on is not videos or pictures but common f*cking sense. 2 aluminum planes cannot pulverize three f*cking buildings made from mild steel and reinforced concrete. When you compare the weight/compound of the planes with the weigh/compound of three f*cking skyscrapers any non-retard will immediately realize how ballsy our government/elite truly is. And they still continue doing it till this day. Any time a powerful entity discloses or is pressed on aggressively advertising information = ITS A f*cking LIE
Its bullshit
For those who are "debunker sheeple" : you are f*cking dumb and deserve what's coming to you. One day your matrix gay ass bubble will pop and I hope you cry like the retarded bitches you are.
Again,,The smoking gun or the elephant in the room is not some youtube video or some documentary , its knowledge. Knowledge in construction. No one needs a degree on anything,just f*cking inform yourself on how shit is built and why. Only then would you realize how bullshit everything you think you know IS!
Sorry for the CAPS in my previous post.
Total 100% agreement. However, your "knowledge" argument (which I myself used 10 years ago) doesnt work anymore, especially online. These idiots have to be hit in the face with it, and even then its become to ingrained in most people to ever challenge their belief systems, it wouldnt matter if George W. Bush himself came on CNN and told the truth about what happened.... nobody would believe it. Just the way it is.
|
|
|
|
Currahee We stand alone, together User ID: 89548 05-02-2012 04:04 AM
Posts: 11,735
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
Ghenghy Wrote:Currahee Wrote:Ghenghy Wrote:Gheez, what an amateur.
First of all, this is the text that accompanies that video on Liveleak.
"200 jumpers" you say? OMG, I cant stop laughing.
Now, exactly where are the bodies in that clip? Nothing in that short segment from 3:07 to 3:13 can be identified as human bodies, are you f*cking kidding me? And the jumpers were digitally inserted, its obvious.
BTW, as to the claim of "200 jumpers", thats just totally absurd. Most of the so called victims were fakes anyway, and less than 250 of the entire database of "victims" names even appeared in the SSDI as of 3 years ago.
You've been duped. Sorry.
I saw the videos live, I'm not sure if they've ever been aired again? You could see jumpers, and that night I saw pics online. Pics I still wish I would've never looked at.
Not saying they couldn't of been faked.
But why would they need to?

To traumatize, and it worked.
All those jumpers were digitally inserted, and the claim of 200 jumpers.,.. well you must realize how insanely ridiculous that is?
Not insane at all to me, have you ever been in a fire? You're saying that no one jumped? Did people die in the towers on 9/11, or do you think the buildings were empty or something? Because jumping away from fire is common place for taller buildings on fire. People have died from jumping as long as we've been building buildings taller than ladders.
But for some reason on 9/11 no one jumped and then they digitally added them in?? It doesn't make any sense. It sounds like disinfo to discredit anyone who questions the 'official' story.
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1974
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XbgbjYkX34
Someday...
...I'll fight in the kumite and make my father proud.
|
|
|
(This post was last modified: 05-02-2012 04:05 AM by Currahee.)
|
|
vintagevixen Registered User User ID: 91587 05-02-2012 04:47 AM
Posts: 9,709
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
RedShift Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:amazing how stupid you sheep are

And we didn't go to Moon either
dang they won't stop with the no planes.
Yes there were detonations planted also. but planes hit the towers. Funny how those planes didn't have windows though.
vv
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 94023 05-02-2012 04:56 AM
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
The Lucky AC Wrote:So...
people adamantly do not believe the official story.....but they believe bodies and planes have been "digitally inserted"?
That is a REAL logical trade off there...
There were planes, but the U.S. was behind the whole thing. Not Al-CIAda
Logic includes reason and evidence. You provide neither, all you have is belief. At this point it looks like the towers were blown up by mini nukes and their were no planes. Jim Fetzer is one of the researchers who is willing to go where the evidence leads. Check him out.
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 93274 05-02-2012 04:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Rager lop guest User ID: 93818 05-02-2012 05:03 AM
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
LoP Guest Wrote:The Lucky AC Wrote:So...
people adamantly do not believe the official story.....but they believe bodies and planes have been "digitally inserted"?
That is a REAL logical trade off there...
There were planes, but the U.S. was behind the whole thing. Not Al-CIAda
Logic includes reason and evidence. You provide neither, all you have is belief. At this point it looks like the towers were blown up by mini nukes and their were no planes. Jim Fetzer is one of the researchers who is willing to go where the evidence leads. Check him out.
That's easy for us to say because we weren't there. Why not go to New York or find somebody who was there that day, near the building, and ask them what they saw? There were thousands who saw it.
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 93274 05-02-2012 05:10 AM
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
Rager Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:The Lucky AC Wrote:So...
people adamantly do not believe the official story.....but they believe bodies and planes have been "digitally inserted"?
That is a REAL logical trade off there...
There were planes, but the U.S. was behind the whole thing. Not Al-CIAda
Logic includes reason and evidence. You provide neither, all you have is belief. At this point it looks like the towers were blown up by mini nukes and their were no planes. Jim Fetzer is one of the researchers who is willing to go where the evidence leads. Check him out.
That's easy for us to say because we weren't there. Why not go to New York or find somebody who was there that day, near the building, and ask them what they saw? There were thousands who saw it.
Problem is finding somebody....
|
|
|
|
Rager lop guest User ID: 93818 05-02-2012 05:13 AM
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
LoP Guest Wrote:Problem is finding somebody.... 
Go to one of the restaurants or ask anyone who works around there. I'm sure you'll find somebody who will tell you. I'm sure if you have your mind set you still wouldn't believe them anyway...even if they did see it all unfold before their very eyes.
I would say that the theory that these were government issued planes and not passenger planes makes sense. Some witnesses said there were no windows, and looked like something from the military. Someone from the media even reported it on that day.
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 93274 05-02-2012 05:16 AM
|
RE: 911 No Plane Theory
Rager Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:Problem is finding somebody.... 
Go to one of the restaurants or ask anyone who works around there. I'm sure you'll find somebody who will tell you. I'm sure if you have your mind set you still wouldn't believe them anyway...even if they did see it all unfold before their very eyes.
I would say that the theory that these were government issued planes and not passenger planes makes sense. Some witnesses said there were no windows, and looked like something from the military. Someone from the media even reported it on that day.
Problem is that a study found that 50% believe what they see on tv rather than what they actually saw:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_w2f0mqAZI
Building 7:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Trj_5J02k
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 93274 05-02-2012 05:17 AM
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 93274 05-02-2012 05:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|