News
news Modern Wheat Is The ‘Perfect Chronic Poison’ Says Expert
news Cockroaches quickly evolving to avoid bait used in traps
news George Soros Switches From Physical Gold to Gold Stocks and That is Very Bullish for Gold Prices
news Four fireballs fall over U.S. in 24 hour period
news Russians drive over North Pole to Canada
news Concentrated Fukushima radioactive plume staying on narrow path toward U.S.
news How to Use Chinese Condiments
news Google’s Plan To Take Over The World
news 'Dead' man comes back to life at his funeral
news Visualizing The Silver Squeeze
news Geothermal Energy
news N.A Poe, Adam Kokesh and Others Arrested at Smokedown Prohibition Cannabis Protest in Philadelphia
news FEMA Plans Clear-Cutting 85,000 Berkeley and Oakland Trees
news Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls The News
news Woman who survived flesh-eating infection, receives bionic hands
news Billionaires Now Own American Politics
news Air Force Chemtrail Whistleblower Exposes Geoengineering
news Yahoo Japan suspects 22 million user IDs leaked: Kyodo
news Ruins of Lost City May Lurk Deep in Honduras Rain Forest
news Dark, massive asteroid to fly by Earth on May 31

Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 10 Votes - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ
NOT A SHEEPLE
User ID: 93317
09-03-2012 09:28 PM

Posts: 15,801



Post: #76
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
They bring up the random bits of supposed evidence in a haphazard and counterproductive manner.
Quote this message in a reply
Yoyodyne
Registered User
User ID: 118446
09-03-2012 09:32 PM

Posts: 3,233



Post: #77
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
KlLLUMINATI  Wrote:
Yoyodyne  Wrote:
KlLLUMINATI  Wrote:
some people dont realize that looking and observing are not the same

I use to be a pilot and know quite well how to "observe". I also know what headings high altitude commercial jets fly from airport to airport. The aircraft I OBSERVED flying over my house were not flying normal headings and it was defiantly not 1 commercial aircraft. It was multiple aircraft flying in formation at high altitude in a gird pattern.

Thats fine its just not proof of a huge conspiracy that millions of people being poisoned slowly.

It's absolute proof to me that they are up there spraying something for some purpose. What that exact purpose is I do not know.
Quote this message in a reply
Da Swede
Registered User
User ID: 118448
09-03-2012 09:39 PM

Posts: 881



Post: #78
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
Adveser  Wrote:
Popular science has long been established as bias on numerous occasions by distorting facts or interpreting science at their convenience and subsequently I do not believe they have enough credibility to accurately make claims regarding the interpretation or utilization of science.

In other words, they are shills.

spot on !! Heartflowers

http://bryce2-2u.freeservers.com/JS/sangstamain.htm
http://www.reverbnation.com/zangsta
http://www.artflakes.com/en/shop/jsangsta
http://www.zangsta.goldrewards.co
Get brand new, brand name merchandise at prices FAR below retail through Pricebenders penny auctions.
Bid now at: http://www.tripleclicks.com/11613793/
Quote this message in a reply
Pi
Infinity
User ID: 3.14159265
09-03-2012 09:41 PM

 



Post: #79
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
Ihoohase
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 115690
09-03-2012 09:47 PM

 



Post: #80
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
KlLLUMINATI  Wrote:
Yoyodyne  Wrote:
KlLLUMINATI  Wrote:
some people dont realize that looking and observing are not the same

I use to be a pilot and know quite well how to "observe". I also know what headings high altitude commercial jets fly from airport to airport. The aircraft I OBSERVED flying over my house were not flying normal headings and it was defiantly not 1 commercial aircraft. It was multiple aircraft flying in formation at high altitude in a gird pattern.

Thats fine its just not proof of a huge conspiracy that millions of people being poisoned slowly.

but the aluminum coming out of the back of the plains is.. see if we agree that they are spraying at least aluminum out of plains for the purposes of weather mod, then we can agree they are poising us. And it is highly unlikely they are not aware of the side effects of spraying megtons of this shit over populations. Don’t forget we are not making the increased levels of aluminum in our soil and water up. It is being tested for over and over and increases a great deal after they spray. So you are going to have to keep denying the fact that these test are happing and that they are legitimate. But the more that the are done by reliable sources I would think it is going to get harder to deny the fact that we are in fact being poisoned , then again maybe not.
Quote this message in a reply
I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ
NOT A SHEEPLE
User ID: 93317
09-03-2012 09:47 PM

Posts: 15,801



Post: #81
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
Adveser  Wrote:
Popular science has long been established as bias on numerous occasions by distorting facts or interpreting science at their convenience and subsequently I do not believe they have enough credibility to accurately make claims regarding the interpretation or utilization of science.

In other words, they are shills.

That makes perfect sense. In 1969 they published an article because they knew that in 20 years they would be shills. Spot on!!!

JptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpaJptdknpa
Quote this message in a reply
RedShift
Further Away...
User ID: 110245
09-03-2012 09:48 PM

Posts: 5,013



Post: #82
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
Da Swede  Wrote:
Adveser  Wrote:
Popular science has long been established as bias on numerous occasions by distorting facts or interpreting science at their convenience and subsequently I do not believe they have enough credibility to accurately make claims regarding the interpretation or utilization of science.

In other words, they are shills.

spot on !! Heartflowers

Then please by all means, enlighten us as to what is a credible source in either of your opinions? I cannot wait to hear your replies. Popcorn

Cynical realism is the intelligent man's best excuse for doing nothing in an intolerable situation.
~Aldous Huxley
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 115690
09-03-2012 09:49 PM

 



Post: #83
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
Pi  Wrote:
Ihoohase

that a self portrate you flip floping fruad?
Quote this message in a reply
Flat
Stoppin' Threads Since '50
User ID: 110393
09-04-2012 08:11 PM

Posts: 1,070



Post: #84
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
LoP Guest  Wrote:
but the aluminum coming out of the back of the plains is.. see if we agree that they are spraying at least aluminum out of plains for the purposes of weather mod, then we can agree they are poising us. And it is highly unlikely they are not aware of the side effects of spraying megtons of this shit over populations. Don’t forget we are not making the increased levels of aluminum in our soil and water up. It is being tested for over and over and increases a great deal after they spray. So you are going to have to keep denying the fact that these test are happing and that they are legitimate. But the more that the are done by reliable sources I would think it is going to get harder to deny the fact that we are in fact being poisoned , then again maybe not.

Can we get to the results of those soil studies? I mean, can you toss up some links to that?

This kind of mass-poisoning would be much more logical. You would even have pilots, like the farmers who douse our shit in poison, saying it's good for us and not speaking out.
Quote this message in a reply
RedShift
Further Away...
User ID: 110245
09-04-2012 10:17 PM

Posts: 5,013



Post: #85
RE: A Challenge to Chemtrail Believers - Explain this 1969 Issue of Popular Science
.

Cynical realism is the intelligent man's best excuse for doing nothing in an intolerable situation.
~Aldous Huxley
(This post was last modified: 09-04-2012 10:17 PM by RedShift.) Quote this message in a reply



Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1