News
news WHO: Ebola moving faster than control efforts
news An Advance in Tractor-Beam Technology
news Finding the Fountain of Youth in an Ancient Irish Bog
news Revolutionary new blood test 'could detect ALL types of cancer'
news Spooky CCTV footage captures ‘ghost’ at theatre
news UFOs Over Toronto Caught On Tape, Prompting Police Reports
news This is the worst Ebola outbreak in history. Here’s why you should be worried.
news Mathematicians Say It’s Probable That Alien Probes Have Reached Earth
news This Mysterious Signal 'Could Not Be Explained By Known Physics,' Astronomers Say
news We were never meant to eat simple or starchy carbohydrates
news Nearly 300,000 suicides in India so far from GMO crop failures

Advertisement



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 10 Vote(s) - 1.4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
johnnybotwright
Registered User
User ID: 191789
09-27-2013 02:40 AM

Posts: 3,786



Post: #1
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
Advertisement
Have not watched it yet, but will later today, a big claim, may be of interest to some.




Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement

LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 145610
09-27-2013 02:43 AM

 



Post: #2
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
Who gives a f*#k.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 136792
09-27-2013 02:45 AM

 



Post: #3
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
It's possible, more and more the elites choose to preserve their bodies with surrogate parents and prosthetic pregnancies. It's not hard to create a believable pregnancy prosthesis for film and television, nor is it hard for photo-ops and staged appearances.

Beyonce for instance did this.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 121016
09-27-2013 02:58 AM

 



Post: #4
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
Sorry but that's bullshit. They value bloodlines so much. I'd have to the little one is the antichrist. Naw, they're just richer than god and have more money than all the rest of us put together. But they are human.
Quote this message in a reply
Ghenghis
Registered User
User ID: 103532
09-27-2013 03:06 AM

Posts: 2,920



Post: #5
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
LoP Guest  Wrote: (09-27-2013 02:58 AM)
Sorry but that's bullshit. They value bloodlines so much. I'd have to the little one is the antichrist. Naw, they're just richer than god and have more money than all the rest of us put together. But they are human.

Its not bullshit, do the research...you obviously havent.

Kate was never pregnant, this was clearly a hoax. Dont know who or where the baby came from, but anybody that has looked closely at what happened can see the obvious gaps in reality.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 55126
09-27-2013 03:06 AM

 



Post: #6
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
Wow...She had a baby in 7 and a half months...Shocking...this proves it

This must be the dumbest shit I've watched in months and I'm the king of watching dumb shit
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 187549
09-27-2013 03:07 AM

 



Post: #7
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
johnnybotwright  Wrote: (09-27-2013 02:40 AM)
Have not watched it yet, but will later today, a big claim, may be of interest to some.





She is a well know actor and busted by you know who. The world is a stage and things are not what they appear.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 185483
09-27-2013 03:12 AM

 



Post: #8
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
would not surprise me, but i don't care about these stupid fake royals.

the only king of this world is God. truth prevails and our creator, God and goodness also always prevail. so whatever the truth it will be known.[/align]
Quote this message in a reply
The Professor
Uncontrollable
User ID: 191650
09-27-2013 03:12 AM

Posts: 1,656



Post: #9
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
LoP Guest  Wrote: (09-27-2013 03:06 AM)
Wow...She had a baby in 7 and a half months...Shocking...this proves it

This must be the dumbest shit I've watched in months and I'm the king of watching dumb shit

The video even says 7 months and 20 days after the ANNOUNCEMENT of her pregnancy (not after conception).

The only thing more stupid than the video is OP posting it without having watched it!

Churches and schools destroy true knowledge...
Political systems and 'democracy' destroy true freedom...
Corporations and banks destroy true wealth or worth...
You, and only you, can destroy your ability to see this!
Quote this message in a reply
Homer Simpson
lop guest
User ID: 190123
09-27-2013 03:16 AM

 



Post: #10
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
LoP Guest  Wrote: (09-27-2013 02:45 AM)
It's possible, more and more the elites choose to preserve their bodies with surrogate parents and prosthetic pregnancies. It's not hard to create a believable pregnancy prosthesis for film and television, nor is it hard for photo-ops and staged appearances.

Beyonce for instance did this.

One thing is for sure, Beyonce didn't carry that baby.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 55126
09-27-2013 03:16 AM

 



Post: #11
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
The Professor  Wrote: (09-27-2013 03:12 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (09-27-2013 03:06 AM)
Wow...She had a baby in 7 and a half months...Shocking...this proves it

This must be the dumbest shit I've watched in months and I'm the king of watching dumb shit

The video even says 7 months and 20 days after the ANNOUNCEMENT of her pregnancy (not after conception).

The only thing more stupid than the video is OP posting it without having watched it!

Yeah, I know. And that's how they started the video. that was their main point. lololol
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 136792
09-27-2013 03:17 AM

 



Post: #12
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
Homer Simpson  Wrote: (09-27-2013 03:16 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (09-27-2013 02:45 AM)
It's possible, more and more the elites choose to preserve their bodies with surrogate parents and prosthetic pregnancies. It's not hard to create a believable pregnancy prosthesis for film and television, nor is it hard for photo-ops and staged appearances.

Beyonce for instance did this.

One thing is for sure, Beyonce didn't carry that baby.

Jhikpghf

I'm assuming Kate's handlers did much better, if this was the case here. Beyonce...f*#k it was embarrassingly obvious.
Quote this message in a reply
johnnybotwright
Registered User
User ID: 191789
09-27-2013 03:38 AM

Posts: 3,786



Post: #13
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
i had other things on , it caught my eye, thought i would post it, and start the ball rolling,

the ring of power, effects us all, to a lesser or greater degree

the crown , illuminati blood lines,

the grand delusion, deception.
(This post was last modified: 09-27-2013 03:38 AM by johnnybotwright.) Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 121016
09-27-2013 03:54 AM

 



Post: #14
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
Homer Simpson  Wrote: (09-27-2013 03:16 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (09-27-2013 02:45 AM)
It's possible, more and more the elites choose to preserve their bodies with surrogate parents and prosthetic pregnancies. It's not hard to create a believable pregnancy prosthesis for film and television, nor is it hard for photo-ops and staged appearances.

Beyonce for instance did this.

One thing is for sure, Beyonce didn't carry that baby.

That's because the "baby'' is like a gorilla. Have you seen "her"? "She" is a FUG. I can't stand Beyonce. I have hated since day one. Just something off about her.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 167986
09-27-2013 04:06 AM

 



Post: #15
A big claim, KATE MIDDLETON NEVER WAS PREGNANT
I don't believe she was pregnant either. Or if she was that she miscarried when she went to the hospital with "morning sickness" and the nurse ended up "committing suicide".

That does not however excuse the stupidity of the video parts I actually watched.

So what if it was only announced in December when she would have been two months pregnant? That's fairly normal.

What is not normal is the foam prosthetic belly she wore the whole time and afterwards.
The baby might even be one of those life like animatronics.
Either that or it is abnormal. After entering bright sunlight for the first time, no reaction.
Upon hearing a screaming crowd, no reaction.
It has absolutely no normal leg movements just slight arm and hand exactly like the ads for these life size, life like baby dolls do.

I don't know the purpose of the scam, but I do know no one has been shown publicly the face of this child then or since that looked real.
Quote this message in a reply












Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1