News

**NEESIE**

Nigel C., United Kingdom, 25 April 2012

I read Wiseman's book "New Discoveries in Babylonia about Genesis" some years ago, and it transformed the way I saw Genesis. Before this, I has no idea how Moses knew what to write regarding the creation, life before and during the flood. Then I discovered that the accounts were eye-witness material. Why was the account of the flood so repetitive? Because three accounts had been combined into one - and the authors' names were still attached! How do we know the account of the Garden of Eden is accurate? Because the author of that chronicle was there, and his name still exists at the end of the narrative!

This interpretation was confirmed to me by Romans 4 vs 23 + 24 which states that Abraham's imputed righteousness was written for us to read, and also for HIM to read! Now, that must have been written in Abraham's lifetime, long before Moses was even born; so he could read in God's Word that God counted him righteous.

There are many interesting points this interpretation throws up. For instance, there was never a time when God's word didn't exist for man to read. The first section was most likely written for Adam when he was newly created as an explanation by God regarding our most important questions in life: where did we come from? Is there a God? etc. Also Noah ends his account with his greatest discovery: 'Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.' and the next section begins with Noah's sons' appraisal of their father: 'Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time, and he walked faithfully with God.'

Genesis is absolutely trustworthy from the first verse.

http://creation.com/archaeologist-confir...-the-bible

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 97033 06-04-2012 03:57 PM

Archaeologist? just one? or "the" one..... Jptdknpa

Got any peer review article links to his work?

**Ahriman**

Before this, I has no idea how Moses knew what to write...

...it was at this point I stopped reading.

Anon

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 100318 06-04-2012 04:01 PM

Nessie, you are a sad case for a human. Religion has clouded your mind to the point that you are unable to see your own naiveness. Sad, very sad.

**NEESIE**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Archaeologist? just one? or "the" one.....

Got any peer review article links to his work?

read the entire article. Hugs

**NEESIE**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Nessie, you are a sad case for a human. Religion has clouded your mind to the point that you are unable to see your own naiveness. Sad, very sad.

thank you.

**NEESIE**

Ahriman Wrote:

Before this, I has no idea how Moses knew what to write...

...it was at this point I stopped reading.

did you just stop reading, like something was controlling you? Heartflowers

**Ahriman** · (This post was last modified: 06-04-2012 04:20 PM by Ahriman.)

NEESIE Wrote:

Ahriman Wrote:
Before this, I has no idea how Moses knew what to write...

...it was at this point I stopped reading.

did you just stop reading, like something was controlling you?

Yes. My common sense.

I read a little futher but then stopped again...

For instance, there was never a time when God's word didn't exist for man to read...

I shall try to read the whole article Nessie. It may take me awhile. We make no guarentees.

Scream1

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 14880 06-04-2012 04:26 PM

Yeah, scientist can prove the bible, but not evolution or gay sex happening in nature.

Fsaqqhab

**NEESIE**

Ahriman Wrote:

NEESIE Wrote:
Ahriman Wrote:
Before this, I has no idea how Moses knew what to write...

...it was at this point I stopped reading.

did you just stop reading, like something was controlling you?

Yes. My common sense.

I read a little futher but then stopped again...

For instance, there was never a time when God's word didn't exist for man to read...

I shall try to read the whole article Nessie. It may take me awhile. We make no guarentees.

well friend, i just appreciate the effort. Heartflowers

~~I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ~~

LoP Guest Wrote:

Yeah, scientist can prove the bible, but not evolution or gay sex happening in nature.

If seemingly homosexual acts among animals are in accordance with animal nature, then parental killing of offspring and intra species devouring are also in accordance with animal nature. Bringing man into the equation complicates things further. Are we to conclude that filicide and cannibalism are according to human nature? Anyone engaged in animal observation is forced to conclude that animal homosexuality, filicide and cannibalism are exceptions to normal animal behavior. Consequently they cannot be called animal instincts. These observable exceptions to normal animal behavior result from factors beyond their instincts.

**The Lucky AC** Everything in life is luck User ID: 888 06-04-2012 04:36 PM

You try oh so very hard to hold to the delusion.

**NEESIE**

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
Yeah, scientist can prove the bible, but not evolution or gay sex happening in nature.

If seemingly homosexual acts among animals are in accordance with animal nature, then parental killing of offspring and intra species devouring are also in accordance with animal nature. Bringing man into the equation complicates things further. Are we to conclude that filicide and cannibalism are according to human nature? Anyone engaged in animal observation is forced to conclude that animal homosexuality, filicide and cannibalism are exceptions to normal animal behavior. Consequently they cannot be called animal instincts. These observable exceptions to normal animal behavior result from factors beyond their instincts.

well said. Hugs

**NEESIE**

The Lucky AC Wrote:

You try oh so very hard to hold to the delusion.

my belief doesnt cost me anything, I have never been happier. Heartflowers

~~I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ~~

The Lucky AC Wrote:

You try oh so very hard to hold to the delusion.

What position do you hold?