News

**BloodRed**

Karu Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
BloodRed Wrote:
~ Hmmmmmmm... seems like just yesterday @top where the shills were arguing against the existence of the Traitor's Road, and belittling anyone who shared information about it the _REALITY_ of it.

~ I wonder what next year will make into moot points, merely by the passage of Time and the inevitable revealing of what is TRUE...?

So then they are fear mongering if the New Madrid blows? I thought after all those map of it being flooded making a "superhighway" would be a moot point, if it was underwater

There is no certainty as to which parts will flood if the NM breaks loose.

~ Guest, are you pointing out the 'humanitarian'/civil uses of the NAFTA corridor (as a means of being an apologist to the TRUE intention behind it)? I'm not sure I understand your statement... do you feel that tptb WOULDN'T spend billions of dollars and years on something that could possibly be destroyed/damaged? If so, I would respond by saying that this country's ONLY _MAJOR_ 'economic' bread.n.butter at this time, could be seen as a 'paid to destroy/kill, paid to rebuild/birth new hearts.n.minds won' model of 'business as usual'... Military-Industrial Complex.

~ Again; not sure of your meaning/perspective...?

1dunno1

**Karu** · (This post was last modified: 09-04-2012 04:56 PM by Karu.)

BloodRed Wrote:

[quote='Karu' pid='4087117' dateline='1346752649']
[quote='BloodRed' pid='4086430' dateline='1346738360']
snip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTUxgOQ_xKk

NAFTA Superhighways revived:

snip

More dots:

SNIP:

HOUSTON - A Canadian company that wants to build an oil pipeline from Alberta's tar sands region to Texas refineries has received a final permit for the Gulf Coast portion of the project and announced Friday that construction on the 485-mile section would start in the coming weeks.

President Barack Obama encouraged TransCanada to move ahead with the segment that will run from a refinery in Cushing, Okla. to Texas after he rejected the broader plan, saying the pipeline needed to be rerouted around Nebraska's sensitive Sand Hills region. For that project, TransCanada needs presidential approval because it crosses an international border. The shorter portion only requires permits from state and federal agencies. TransCanada said the final of three permits it needed from the Army Corps of Engineers had been approved.

"Receiving this final, key Army Corps permit for the Gulf Coast Project is very positive news. TransCanada is now poised to put approximately 4,000 Americans to work constructing the $2.3-billion pipeline that will be built in three distinct 'spreads' or sections," Russ Girling, TransCanada's president and chief executive officer, said in a statement.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20120727/DA09HB002.html

Thanks to Democrats China Poised to Cut $15.1 Billion Oil Deal With Canada ....

http://connect.freedomworks.org/news/vie...e%2F283456

.......

“We saw the central part of the country become the crossroads of America after the other interstates were built,” said Saul Gonzalez, Con-way chief operating officer. “And the new interstate will only improve that.”

Kansas City SmartPort, a nonprofit organization promoting this region as a logistics hub, is also pumped.

Arkansas holds the key to when or whether the new interstate connects all the way to the Gulf of Mexico.

There is already an interstate south of Bella Vista to Fort Smith, Ark., and the road south of Texarkana almost to the Louisiana line is up to interstate standards. But there remains a gap of 180 miles in between that includes crossing the Ouachita Mountains. The cost of completing the project in Arkansas – and thus completing an uninterrupted interstate path from New Orleans to the Canadian border via I-29 – is estimated at $3 billion dollars

http://www.kansascity.com/2012/09/02/379...rylink=cpy

**dazedb42**

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/...rticle.htm

and you have a problem with china?

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 79462 09-04-2012 05:05 PM

Leroy Jenkins! Wrote:

Not being a smart ass but why is this pinned?

Ancient Chinese Secret.

**Malu**

Laconic
Registered User
User ID: 112625
Today 03:53 AM

Laconic Wrote:

Chinese Trojan horse???

I mean, who would expect a cruise ship to be loaded with soldiers, right?

always scary when two people think exactly the same thing at exactly the same time

Malu
Registered User
User ID: 113924
Today 03:53 AM

kind of explains why china now owns the panama canal. i believe we have a very large problem. think "trojan horse"

**SexualChocolate**

LoP Guest Wrote:

It's the Rove Boat

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 61154 09-04-2012 05:56 PM

Quote:~ Guest, are you pointing out the 'humanitarian'/civil uses of the NAFTA corridor (as a means of being an apologist to the TRUE intention behind it)? I'm not sure I understand your statement... do you feel that tptb WOULDN'T spend billions of dollars and years on something that could possibly be destroyed/damaged? If so, I would respond by saying that this country's ONLY _MAJOR_ 'economic' bread.n.butter at this time, could be seen as a 'paid to destroy/kill, paid to rebuild/birth new hearts.n.minds won' model of 'business as usual'... Military-Industrial Complex.

~ Again; not sure of your meaning/perspective...?

Unfortunately, my sarcasm doesn't come through.. chuckle

**BloodRed**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Quote:~ Guest, are you pointing out the 'humanitarian'/civil uses of the NAFTA corridor (as a means of being an apologist to the TRUE intention behind it)? I'm not sure I understand your statement... do you feel that tptb WOULDN'T spend billions of dollars and years on something that could possibly be destroyed/damaged? If so, I would respond by saying that this country's ONLY _MAJOR_ 'economic' bread.n.butter at this time, could be seen as a 'paid to destroy/kill, paid to rebuild/birth new hearts.n.minds won' model of 'business as usual'... Military-Industrial Complex.

~ Again; not sure of your meaning/perspective...?

Unfortunately, my sarcasm doesn't come through..

~ AH. My bad (coffee was still brewing). =P

Heartflowers

**Karu**

Malu Wrote:

Laconic
Registered User
User ID: 112625
Today 03:53 AM

Laconic Wrote:
Chinese Trojan horse???

I mean, who would expect a cruise ship to be loaded with soldiers, right?

always scary when two people think exactly the same thing at exactly the same time

Malu
Registered User
User ID: 113924
Today 03:53 AM

kind of explains why china now owns the panama canal. i believe we have a very large problem. think "trojan horse"

**A One** lop guest User ID: 116308 09-04-2012 10:37 PM

Laconic Wrote:

Chinese Trojan horse???

I mean, who would expect a cruise ship to be loaded with soldiers, right?

This ^^. They could float multiple ships into harbors on east, west, and gulf coasts and no civilians would suspect a thing. Unload in middle of night and wake up to no America.

**Jade budda**

The Lucky AC Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
NWO wont give them anything else

China is a NWO country. The revolution was bought and paid for by the Rothschild banks just like the Russian revolution was.

USA is NWO
China is NWO
Russia is NWO
UK is NWO
EU is NWO

The United Nations is the NWO control body in waiting.
IMF is NWO
WHO is NWO
WTO is NWO

Lots of games being played with people.

all but three : Syria, Iran, north Korea.
Just a big show. No such thing as countries.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 64729 09-05-2012 01:30 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qzjmaAzQV8

**NoPudding**

Well they are resourceful..

[Image: 0AD2_504694AC.jpg]

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 98922 09-05-2012 04:06 AM

Boats are like sitting ducks, I wouldn't worry about this. And tanks are so old school. If it can't fly away, it's an easy target, troops included.

**Karu**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Boats are like sitting ducks, I wouldn't worry about this. And tanks are so old school. If it can't fly away, it's an easy target, troops included.

Then why do we have aircraft carriers and other ships?