News

**Red Red Whine**

Finally!

http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/late...lain-baby/

Coroner Elizabeth Morris told a packed courtroom on Tuesday that a dingo was to blame for the attack at Uluru, which originally saw Azaria’s mother Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton jailed for murder and her husband Michael given a suspended sentence for being an accessory after the fact.

Both were later exonerated after a royal commission in 1987.

---------------

About time that poor woman had some peace of mind regarding the death certificate.

**aBiNoRmAl**

I remember Elaine, in Seinfeld saying "a dingo ate your baby" at a party when she was on muscle relaxers...I had no idea what she was talking about...then I saw a movie about it and realized wtf??? That was a strange situation...that woman went to prison for a while, too..

**Red Red Whine** · (This post was last modified: 06-12-2012 05:38 AM by Red Red Whine.)

Yes I know. Half the world believed she killed the child and half didnt. The main problems they had was with Lindy....her lack of expression, abrupt manner of speaking and Seventh Day Adventist beliefs. If she had been teary, pleasant sounding and christian or athiest....I doubt she would have even not been disbelieved.

I worked at the photolab that developed the pics of the evidence pre trial and even I could see that scissors had nothng to do with the marks made on that babies clothes. Exciting day with a police presense. Anyhow Oz was after a scapegoat. I wonder if Lindy did or will get financial compensation for what she went through?

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 99336 06-12-2012 10:49 AM

Wow. Unreal that you were working at that photolab..

And, as you know, the public loves a good public execution! What a shame it took this long for justice to come about.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101828 06-12-2012 10:56 AM

ohhhh that was around the 79-80 election

thats around the time of the

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101828 06-12-2012 11:02 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

ohhhh that was around the 79-80 election

thats around the time of the

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 65558 06-12-2012 11:06 AM

How does a Dingo get a baby anyway.

Are they simply roaming the streets and jumping into prams making away with babies?

What, is this bushmen babies being eaten in the wild?

The Dingo in the Vid never eats babies:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxO1cho97...1884110708

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101957 06-12-2012 11:06 AM

Red Red Whine Wrote:

Yes I know. Half the world believed she killed the child and half didnt. The main problems they had was with Lindy....her lack of expression, abrupt manner of speaking and Seventh Day Adventist beliefs. If she had been teary, pleasant sounding and christian or athiest....I doubt she would have even not been disbelieved.

I worked at the photolab that developed the pics of the evidence pre trial and even I could see that scissors had nothng to do with the marks made on that babies clothes. Exciting day with a police presense. Anyhow Oz was after a scapegoat. I wonder if Lindy did or will get financial compensation for what she went through?

Bullshit,that baby was sacrificed in some sort of occultist ritual and the elite were involved (as they always are) - that's why she walked.
Many people have come to realise this now.
Check flights into and out of Alice Springs and you will find that some high up elites visited Alice over that exact time frame and were gone WAY before anyone heard those words-"A dingo took my baby".
There's more,LOTS more.

**The Lucky AC** Everything in life is luck User ID: 888 06-12-2012 11:07 AM

He just said that because his kid did it when he was smoking bath salts.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101828 06-12-2012 11:17 AM

i remember when i was about 2 and half years old

My parents locking me outside the house at night; and I was screaming to let me in the house.

crazy to fo that to a 2 year old

strange stuff

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101828 06-12-2012 11:20 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

i remember when i was about 2 and half years old

My parents locking me outside the house at night; and I was screaming to let me in the house.

crazy to fo that to a 2 year old

strange stuff

guess that is when the darker side made its move Jhikpghf

**evilolive**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Red Red Whine Wrote:
Yes I know. Half the world believed she killed the child and half didnt. The main problems they had was with Lindy....her lack of expression, abrupt manner of speaking and Seventh Day Adventist beliefs. If she had been teary, pleasant sounding and christian or athiest....I doubt she would have even not been disbelieved.

I worked at the photolab that developed the pics of the evidence pre trial and even I could see that scissors had nothng to do with the marks made on that babies clothes. Exciting day with a police presense. Anyhow Oz was after a scapegoat. I wonder if Lindy did or will get financial compensation for what she went through?
Bullshit,that baby was sacrificed in some sort of occultist ritual and the elite were involved (as they always are) - that's why she walked.
Many people have come to realise this now.
Check flights into and out of Alice Springs and you will find that some high up elites visited Alice over that exact time frame and were gone WAY before anyone heard those words-"A dingo took my baby".
There's more,LOTS more.

Elites wouldnt give a shit for Australia - please come up with a better idea, crackpot.

**dazedb42**

Red Red Whine Wrote:

Yes I know. Half the world believed she killed the child and half didnt. The main problems they had was with Lindy....her lack of expression, abrupt manner of speaking and Seventh Day Adventist beliefs. If she had been teary, pleasant sounding and christian or athiest....I doubt she would have even not been disbelieved.

I worked at the photolab that developed the pics of the evidence pre trial and even I could see that scissors had nothng to do with the marks made on that babies clothes. Exciting day with a police presense. Anyhow Oz was after a scapegoat. I wonder if Lindy did or will get financial compensation for what she went through?

Ok here we go.

The unofficial story is this. One the night in question Azaria was in the tent with the other kids. These kids should be witnesses to the act but are not. The scissor marks in the jump suit are only a few of the marks as it is not contested that at one stage a dingo did make off with the remains.

The dingo was a bit of a pet to a park ranger and he found the jumpsuit under his house. He then proceeded to shit himself and bury the jumpsuit out in the desert as to not incriminate himself or his pet dingo.

I have first hand accounts that what freaked everyone out at the campsite was that as soon as Lindy cried the infamous "the dingo took my baby!" She was not inconsolable but rather indifferent. Remember at the time the only people who camped at Ayers Rock were serious campers, nearly everyone of them had rifles and spotlights for shooting.

The other campers wanted to organise a search party straight away but she would not let them. This is where the conspiracy started.

Popular consensus is that Lindy is covering for one of the kids. Sociopathic b*tch but innocent of infantcide.

/2c

**chookaKahn NLI** lop guest User ID: 91311 06-12-2012 12:06 PM

Red Red Whine Wrote:

Yes I know. Half the world believed she killed the child and half didnt. The main problems they had was with Lindy....her lack of expression, abrupt manner of speaking and Seventh Day Adventist beliefs. If she had been teary, pleasant sounding and christian or athiest....I doubt she would have even not been disbelieved.

I worked at the photolab that developed the pics of the evidence pre trial and even I could see that scissors had nothng to do with the marks made on that babies clothes. Exciting day with a police presense. Anyhow Oz was after a scapegoat. I wonder if Lindy did or will get financial compensation for what she went through?

There were a lot of egos on trial, wasn't there- all determined to 'save face' :-(
And all those 'experts' kept their reputations and jobs and got promoted; I'm really not comfortable with the situation of Joy Kuhl's involvement in the Falconio trial.

I think Malcom Brown's article in conclusion last week captures the mentality:

"...The passion for the territory government to insist that things happen according to established procedure continued even after it relented in 1986 and ordered a royal commission. But trying to preserve the convictions became increasingly difficult once the Morling royal commission got under way. When it shot so many holes in the Crown case on identification of blood, the territory's Crown counsel tried to suggest the baby had been killed outside the car. Morling said the Crown had started in the car and that was where it had to finish.

When the Chamberlains were exonerated in 1987, the territory retained Michael Adams, QC, to resist the application.

The Crown witnesses in the trial were forced by the adversary system into stubbornly upholding their opinions. As it turned out years later, some of them were wrong. That was an obstacle for the Chamberlains. So was the attitude of the government and police, who were pushed by political pressure into the same defensive posture. The weight of police and Crown resources, backed by the financial resources of a government, could be crushing to a couple like the Chamberlains. In the initial period, they could not overcome it. Now, after more than 30 years, they finally have...."

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national...201dk.html

Even Wendy Harmer gave an abject apology for carrying a 'burning stick'
http://www.theage.com.au/national/comedi...207qy.html