News

**katsung47**

http://truththeory.com/wp-content/upload...9786_n.jpg

picture compare with Madrid fire

~~I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ~~

katsung47 Wrote:

http://truththeory.com/wp-content/upload...9786_n.jpg

picture compare with Madrid fire

Madrid towers didnt have a 150 ton airplane slam into at 500mph

**absurdious** · **absurdious** INFP User ID: 27152 09-10-2012 11:00 PM **Posts: 15,902**

katsung47 Wrote:

Could the fire burn down WTC?

No.

**Mike** lop guest User ID: 94568 09-10-2012 11:02 PM

The common argument is the planes smashing into the towers forcibly removed the fire resistant coating on the steel beams. In the Madrid fire, this coating would have remained intact.

**Joshua Flynn**

KlLLUMINATI Wrote:

katsung47 Wrote:
http://truththeory.com/wp-content/upload...9786_n.jpg

picture compare with Madrid fire

Madrid towers didnt have a 150 ton airplane slam into at 500mph

Neither did WTC 7 but that still fell.

~~I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ~~

Mike Wrote:

The common argument is the planes smashing into the towers forcibly removed the fire resistant coating on the steel beams. In the Madrid fire, this coating would have remained intact.

comparing the two events is ignorant because they're not the same

**Joshua Flynn**

Joshua Flynn Wrote:

KlLLUMINATI Wrote:
katsung47 Wrote:
http://truththeory.com/wp-content/upload...9786_n.jpg

picture compare with Madrid fire

Madrid towers didnt have a 150 ton airplane slam into at 500mph

Neither did WTC 7 but that still fell.

Conversely, the pentagon did but it remained relatively intact.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 115486 09-10-2012 11:05 PM

katsung47 Wrote:

http://truththeory.com/wp-content/upload...9786_n.jpg

picture compare with Madrid fire

Reenforced concrete core.

**Joshua Flynn**

Better question: how did a fire break out in WTC 7 in the first place if nothing hit it?

~~I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ~~

Joshua Flynn Wrote:

Better question: how did a fire break out in WTC 7 in the first place if nothing hit it?

yeah nothing hit except for a building

Pi Infinity User ID: 3.14159265 09-10-2012 11:12 PM

The building was pulverized, not enough time to burn down even if it could have burned down.

**Joshua Flynn**

KlLLUMINATI Wrote:

Joshua Flynn Wrote:
Better question: how did a fire break out in WTC 7 in the first place if nothing hit it?

yeah nothing hit except for a building

That was afterwards:
[Image: washer2vt1.jpg]

The building is clearly on fire, inside, before hand.

I supposed you will argue the firey ashes broke open the windows, let themselves in and started up without sprinkler suppression systems activating?

**Leroy Jenkins!**

KlLLUMINATI Wrote:

Joshua Flynn Wrote:
Better question: how did a fire break out in WTC 7 in the first place if nothing hit it?

yeah nothing hit except for a building

Are you playing Devils Advocate or do you belive the Media verison of 911?

~~I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ~~

Joshua Flynn Wrote:

KlLLUMINATI Wrote:
Joshua Flynn Wrote:
Better question: how did a fire break out in WTC 7 in the first place if nothing hit it?

yeah nothing hit except for a building

That was afterwards:

The building is clearly on fire, inside, before hand.

I supposed you will argue the firey ashes broke open the windows, let themselves in and started up without sprinkler suppression systems activating?

**Joshua Flynn** · (This post was last modified: 09-10-2012 11:20 PM by Joshua Flynn.)

KlLLUMINATI Wrote:

Joshua Flynn Wrote:
KlLLUMINATI Wrote:
yeah nothing hit except for a building

That was afterwards:

The building is clearly on fire, inside, before hand.

I supposed you will argue the firey ashes broke open the windows, let themselves in and started up without sprinkler suppression systems activating?

Clearly unscorched in the latter picture.

You didn't answer my prior post. It clearly shows the building already on fire before the buildings fell.

If you were portenting the fires weren't there:
[Image: wtc7firesclose.jpg]