News
news Archaeologists discover Stonehenge was once a full circle
news The Mount Polley Mine Disaster Has Produced a Mysterious, Waxy Blue Substance
news Birthing Males a Real Possibility
news Sony Network Hackers Allegedly Busted by FBI
news NASA Issues New Warning on the Danger to the Power Grid Posed by Solar Flares
news Scientists say Southwestern U.S. now faces 50 percent chance of decades-long 'megadrought'
news Painful memories eased by inhaling xenon gas
news Ebola virus has mutated during course of outbreak
news Astronomers Discover Planetary Collision in Another Solar System
news New Model Shows How Eruption of Yellowstone Would Effect North America
news Could we soon send emails 'telepathically'?

Advertisement
Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Current Radiation Levels Of Northern California
Savwafair2012
Registered User
User ID: 28588
04-13-2011 10:02 PM

Posts: 214



Post: #1
Current Radiation Levels Of Northern California
Advertisement
http://allegedlyapparent.files.wordpress...=521&h=476

How “radioactive” is Northern California at the moment, really?
Posted on April 12, 2011 by Michaël V.B.

Far-northern California in many ways remains very dear to me, as it has been ‘home’ for about a decade after I moved out of Western Europe in the mid-1990′s. For my dear friends still out there, here’s an overview of “the situation”… (regarding radiation) from my perspective:

The EPA Radnet monitor in Eureka has been taken offline for some time, which leaves this enormous coastal area de facto PUBLICLY UNMONITORED. I haven’t ‘cut out’ anything of this map – it is as provided (April12, 2011) by the US government’s EPA Radnet. This is, for real, the EPA’s “vast network” of radiation network in the region closest to Japan ‘in the lower 48 states’. The image below shows the area closest to Japan is de facto unmonitored. With as much public anxiety and interest, I’m sorry, but that’s a bit… may I say… ‘suspicious’… Light-Blue stattions are, off-line (‘under survey’, with ‘data not available’,… being reviewed, you know, by ‘experts’…):

https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do (screenshot Apr/11/2011)


So now that I have shown you how much the U.S. ‘Environmental Protection Agency’ (EPA) truly cares about the radiation safety of the US’s lower 48 States’s 500+ km of Pacific Ocean shoreline (CA & OR), and enormous (populated) regions, here’s some sobering data from UC Berkeley:

http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2525

http://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2...nt-really/


So now that I have shown you how much the U.S. ‘Environmental Protection Agency’ (EPA) truly cares about the radiation safety of the US’s lower 48 States’s 500+ km of Pacific Ocean shoreline (CA & OR), and enormous (populated) regions, here’s some sobering data from UC Berkeley:

http://allegedlyapparent.files.wordpress...=305&h=600
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement













Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1