News
news Plague warning in Colorado.
news Does Gravity Hold the Key to Proving Existence of Parallel Worlds?
news Global warming slowdown 'could last another decade'
news Sea plankton ‘found living outside International Space Station’
news UFO Sighters Have Found A Bone In Mars Amidst Reports of UFO Sighting
news The future is now and it’s terrifying – new cafe in China is run entirely by robots
news Life Confirmed Under Antarctic Ice; Is Space Next?
news Fungus Turning Ants In To Zombie Ants
news U.S. Researchers Claim Breakthrough: Microbes Discovered in Deep Antarctic Ice
news Octopus Inspired Exotic Material Could Lead to Invisibility Tech
news Significant Earthquake Swarm Hits Iceland’s Barðarbunga

Advertisement
Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Current Radiation Levels Of Northern California
Savwafair2012
Registered User
User ID: 28588
04-13-2011 10:02 PM

Posts: 214



Post: #1
Current Radiation Levels Of Northern California
Advertisement
http://allegedlyapparent.files.wordpress...=521&h=476

How “radioactive” is Northern California at the moment, really?
Posted on April 12, 2011 by Michaël V.B.

Far-northern California in many ways remains very dear to me, as it has been ‘home’ for about a decade after I moved out of Western Europe in the mid-1990′s. For my dear friends still out there, here’s an overview of “the situation”… (regarding radiation) from my perspective:

The EPA Radnet monitor in Eureka has been taken offline for some time, which leaves this enormous coastal area de facto PUBLICLY UNMONITORED. I haven’t ‘cut out’ anything of this map – it is as provided (April12, 2011) by the US government’s EPA Radnet. This is, for real, the EPA’s “vast network” of radiation network in the region closest to Japan ‘in the lower 48 states’. The image below shows the area closest to Japan is de facto unmonitored. With as much public anxiety and interest, I’m sorry, but that’s a bit… may I say… ‘suspicious’… Light-Blue stattions are, off-line (‘under survey’, with ‘data not available’,… being reviewed, you know, by ‘experts’…):

https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do (screenshot Apr/11/2011)


So now that I have shown you how much the U.S. ‘Environmental Protection Agency’ (EPA) truly cares about the radiation safety of the US’s lower 48 States’s 500+ km of Pacific Ocean shoreline (CA & OR), and enormous (populated) regions, here’s some sobering data from UC Berkeley:

http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2525

http://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2...nt-really/


So now that I have shown you how much the U.S. ‘Environmental Protection Agency’ (EPA) truly cares about the radiation safety of the US’s lower 48 States’s 500+ km of Pacific Ocean shoreline (CA & OR), and enormous (populated) regions, here’s some sobering data from UC Berkeley:

http://allegedlyapparent.files.wordpress...=305&h=600
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement













Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1