News
news New York City's Rats Are Carrying Viruses No One's Seen Before
news UFOs in West Virginia: 10 witnesses, 4 low-flying UFOs, 3 big as football fields
news Mysterious Spontaneous Combustions Return to Sicilian City
news X-37B Military Space Plane Lands After Record-Shattering Secret Mission
news Syrian Ambassador Calls ISIS An ‘American Myth’
news Genetic engineering will one day create the smartest humans who have ever lived.
news FBI Wants Encryption Regulated
news Lockheed Claims Fusion Energy Breakthrough
news Cleveland Area Schools Cancel Classes Over Ebola Concerns
news Earth's magnetic field could flip within a human lifetime
news WHO: 10,000 new Ebola cases per week could be seen

Advertisement
Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Current Radiation Levels Of Northern California
Savwafair2012
Registered User
User ID: 28588
04-13-2011 10:02 PM

Posts: 214



Post: #1
Current Radiation Levels Of Northern California
Advertisement
http://allegedlyapparent.files.wordpress...=521&h=476

How “radioactive” is Northern California at the moment, really?
Posted on April 12, 2011 by Michaël V.B.

Far-northern California in many ways remains very dear to me, as it has been ‘home’ for about a decade after I moved out of Western Europe in the mid-1990′s. For my dear friends still out there, here’s an overview of “the situation”… (regarding radiation) from my perspective:

The EPA Radnet monitor in Eureka has been taken offline for some time, which leaves this enormous coastal area de facto PUBLICLY UNMONITORED. I haven’t ‘cut out’ anything of this map – it is as provided (April12, 2011) by the US government’s EPA Radnet. This is, for real, the EPA’s “vast network” of radiation network in the region closest to Japan ‘in the lower 48 states’. The image below shows the area closest to Japan is de facto unmonitored. With as much public anxiety and interest, I’m sorry, but that’s a bit… may I say… ‘suspicious’… Light-Blue stattions are, off-line (‘under survey’, with ‘data not available’,… being reviewed, you know, by ‘experts’…):

https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do (screenshot Apr/11/2011)


So now that I have shown you how much the U.S. ‘Environmental Protection Agency’ (EPA) truly cares about the radiation safety of the US’s lower 48 States’s 500+ km of Pacific Ocean shoreline (CA & OR), and enormous (populated) regions, here’s some sobering data from UC Berkeley:

http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2525

http://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2...nt-really/


So now that I have shown you how much the U.S. ‘Environmental Protection Agency’ (EPA) truly cares about the radiation safety of the US’s lower 48 States’s 500+ km of Pacific Ocean shoreline (CA & OR), and enormous (populated) regions, here’s some sobering data from UC Berkeley:

http://allegedlyapparent.files.wordpress...=305&h=600
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement













Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1