News
news New 40-seat 'Bio-Bus' runs on human waste
news Black Holes Align with Each Other
news Smelly Corpse Flower Set to Bloom
news Two New Subatomic Particles Discovered by CERN Physicists
news Shape-shifting home transforms throughout the year in response to changing temperatures
news Strange Russian Spacecraft Could Be Space Weapon
news Breakthrough: Comet Lander Detected Organic Molecules
news The man who can hear Wi-Fi wherever he walks
news Transylvania’s Haunted Forest, Known as Romania’s ‘Bermuda Triangle’: Hoia Baciu
news 'Killer robots' need to be strictly monitored, nations warn at UN meeting
news Astronomers Puzzled by Stormy Clouds Around Uranus

Advertisement
Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Current Radiation Levels Of Northern California
Savwafair2012
Registered User
User ID: 28588
04-13-2011 10:02 PM

Posts: 214



Post: #1
Current Radiation Levels Of Northern California
Advertisement
http://allegedlyapparent.files.wordpress...=521&h=476

How “radioactive” is Northern California at the moment, really?
Posted on April 12, 2011 by Michaël V.B.

Far-northern California in many ways remains very dear to me, as it has been ‘home’ for about a decade after I moved out of Western Europe in the mid-1990′s. For my dear friends still out there, here’s an overview of “the situation”… (regarding radiation) from my perspective:

The EPA Radnet monitor in Eureka has been taken offline for some time, which leaves this enormous coastal area de facto PUBLICLY UNMONITORED. I haven’t ‘cut out’ anything of this map – it is as provided (April12, 2011) by the US government’s EPA Radnet. This is, for real, the EPA’s “vast network” of radiation network in the region closest to Japan ‘in the lower 48 states’. The image below shows the area closest to Japan is de facto unmonitored. With as much public anxiety and interest, I’m sorry, but that’s a bit… may I say… ‘suspicious’… Light-Blue stattions are, off-line (‘under survey’, with ‘data not available’,… being reviewed, you know, by ‘experts’…):

https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do (screenshot Apr/11/2011)


So now that I have shown you how much the U.S. ‘Environmental Protection Agency’ (EPA) truly cares about the radiation safety of the US’s lower 48 States’s 500+ km of Pacific Ocean shoreline (CA & OR), and enormous (populated) regions, here’s some sobering data from UC Berkeley:

http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2525

http://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2...nt-really/


So now that I have shown you how much the U.S. ‘Environmental Protection Agency’ (EPA) truly cares about the radiation safety of the US’s lower 48 States’s 500+ km of Pacific Ocean shoreline (CA & OR), and enormous (populated) regions, here’s some sobering data from UC Berkeley:

http://allegedlyapparent.files.wordpress...=305&h=600
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement













Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1