News

republicans wants you to forget about
1992 hurricane andrew killed 50 thosand people in florida
http://www.karenlyster.com/andrew.html

http://rense.com/general89/haitss.htm
http://rense.com/general92/super.htm

http://rense.com/general94/attn.htm

http://rense.com/general56/missing.htm

sept 8 1900
galveston hurricane killed 8000+ and had 40 foot tidal surge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1900_Galveston_hurricane

http://www.1900storm.com/
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/galveston.htm

September 2. 1935 1935 huricane
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1935_Labor_Day_hurricane

September 10 1919 Florida Keys hurricane 772 dead
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1919_Florid..._Hurricane

September 16 1928
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1928_Okeechobee_hurricane

hurricane andrew killed 50 thosand people in florida
http://rense.com/general89/haitss.htm

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/11/02/9111961/

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/...r-in-1660/

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/...io-valley/

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/...th-dakota/

dead wetbacks were not counted
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/...rst-flood/

http://www.publicopiniononline.com/lates...later.html

http://www.summitcamp.org/status/webcam/
http://rense.com/general89/labe.htm

see also

http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Global-W...pid4494555
pge 10 post 143

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 126214 11-02-2012 08:21 PM

diggerbanks Wrote:

flintstone Wrote:
diggerbanks Wrote:
I agree, it is the only mechanism to re-establish equilibrium.

there is no equilibrium in a natural cycle. granted we did accelerate it more than likely, but you cannot change it now.

What the f*ck are you talking about? Of course there is equilibrium in a natural cycle, in a natural system. Where the hell did you get that nonsense from?

there's never been equilibrium in our natural cycles

**6feetsnow-wow** lop guest User ID: 125195 11-02-2012 08:24 PM

here comes the ice age--prepare yourself
(you will not need a freezer or refrigerator)

6feetsnow-wow
http://www.register-herald.com/todaysfro...ED-BY-SNOW

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 115281 11-02-2012 09:34 PM

diggerbanks Wrote:

These people DO NOT make this stuff up.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...conds.html

I don't know why we have to wait for incontrovertible proof. The logic is there for anyone with a mind.

No, you have ZERO logic.
Logic implies that you take into account past (and verified) historical experience. It also means, that you finally notice that there is a SUN. Yes a real sun.
It also implies that you know chemistry and you also accept the incontrovertible evidence, that CO2 went up AFTER warming periods and NOT BEFORE. (Cause and effect). There is a simple reason for that, but why don't you find it out on your own. (Hint: chemistry).

The historic evidence is Roman times, and the warm-up period from 1000 to 1300. Both were WARMER than today.
We also KNOW that between the ice ages the planet on average was WARMER than today.
Educate yourself. You just MIGHT learn something.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 57716 11-02-2012 10:05 PM

diggerbanks Wrote:

These people DO NOT make this stuff up.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...conds.html

I don't know why we have to wait for incontrovertible proof. The logic is there for anyone with a mind.

If you use heat in a (near as damn it) closed system, the relatively closed system can do nothing but heat up.

YEAH & IF YOU PAY YOUR CARBON TAX PROMPTLY -- THERE WILL BE NO GLOBAL WARMING.

Jptdknpa

CONVERTIBLE HAND IN MY BACK POCKET TRYING TO STEAL MY MONEY WITH YOUR CON..

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 57716 11-03-2012 07:15 AM

.. PAY for oxygen tax next

**diggerbanks**

LoP Guest Wrote:

diggerbanks Wrote:
These people DO NOT make this stuff up.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...conds.html

I don't know why we have to wait for incontrovertible proof. The logic is there for anyone with a mind.

If you use heat in a (near as damn it) closed system, the relatively closed system can do nothing but heat up.

YEAH & IF YOU PAY YOUR CARBON TAX PROMPTLY -- THERE WILL BE NO GLOBAL WARMING.

CONVERTIBLE HAND IN MY BACK POCKET TRYING TO STEAL MY MONEY WITH YOUR CON..

Tax has become such an emotive word in America. Blown way out of context by hype and scaremongering. Whatever tax gets levied the ptb will have to take into account the payability. If it is a tax on gas consumption, then you can avoid it by using less gas. Simple really. And necessary. They are not so much revenue-generators as behavior-modifiers. And behaviors need to be changed.

**Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη**

diggerbanks Wrote:

Tax has become such an emotive word in America. Blown way out of context by hype and scaremongering. Whatever tax gets levied the ptb will have to take into account the payability. If it is a tax on gas consumption, then you can avoid it by using less gas. Simple really. And necessary. They are not so much revenue-generators as behavior-modifiers. And behaviors need to be changed.

**diggerbanks**

DrPostman Wrote:

diggerbanks Wrote:
Tax has become such an emotive word in America. Blown way out of context by hype and scaremongering. Whatever tax gets levied the ptb will have to take into account the payability. If it is a tax on gas consumption, then you can avoid it by using less gas. Simple really. And necessary. They are not so much revenue-generators as behavior-modifiers. And behaviors need to be changed.

Amazing graphic DrP. (as always). Context and perspective seem to be so underrated.

Do you have a graphic or stats that show the real income or quality of life in America during those presidents' tenures? Basically what I would like to see is if Americans fared better after Reagan than before.

**haarpseaicecatastrophe911** lop guest User ID: 136585 11-27-2012 10:25 PM

http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/hycomARC/...nim30d.gif

It is too coincidental that this is happening during the Doha conference—
It really does look like the 911 disaster fraud of global warming—
It appears that almost all of the old
Arctic ice has disappeared in 2 days—
It is either a deliberate computer data tampering fraud—
Or it is a monumental sea ice disaster about to descend upon
Europe—
Genererated by either haarp or
Energy weapons or both.

Looking at this US Navy ice animation
there appears to be an interesting arctic development
(extraordinary to my limited scientific analysis capabilities)--
In the arctic ocean, north of the 80 degree arctic circle,
running along the northern Greenland and Canadian arctic coasts,
Suddenly, a vast break has appeared in the very heavy sea ice
(the red and black ice)(you can see that it was very thick until 2 days ago)
A thin rapidly expanding line appears
in this animation in this area that has been
growing steadily to red and black since october
(as it always does in the winter).
(Temperature are minus 25C to minus 35C in that area right now)

I have followed this animated graph for several years.
This has never happened before—and this area of sea ice —in the space of 2 days has
Suddenly gone from expanding steadily and being thicker than normal to
become less ice thickness than it ever has been in at least the past 2 years,
now suddenly having much less thick sea ice than even this past summer—
while at the same time, the remainder of the arctic sea ice
has continued expanding at the normal rate.
I can only conclude that an extraordinary monumental
data computer fudge has been initiated in anticipation of the
announcement of claiming arctic sea ice loss--
Or else this vast mass of ice is about to break free and
descend upon on the north atlantic and totally freeze
europe and disrupt European weather.

Watch that white line expand.

http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/hycomARC/...nim30d.gif

temps
http://ogimet.com/cgi-bin/gsynop?lang=en...&Send=send

**Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη**

diggerbanks Wrote:

Amazing graphic DrP. (as always). Context and perspective seem to be so underrated.

Do you have a graphic or stats that show the real income or quality of life in America during those presidents' tenures? Basically what I would like to see is if Americans fared better after Reagan than before.

For some reason I didn't see your question until today. Sorry for the
delay. How do these do:

[Image: 3116_50B59953.jpg]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

And related to the thread topic, ocean acidification is increasing:
http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Sea-butt...dification

**IWANTOGOTOTHERE**

flintstone Wrote:

too damn tired to debate this shit tonight. maybe another day. i'll give u half credit, we are warming ourselves into the next ice age.

At this point who gives a shit if its warming or cooling or whatever lets just call it climate change and its getting rdy to kick our asses….

**Ixebeche**

IWANTOGOTOTHERE Wrote:

flintstone Wrote:
too damn tired to debate this shit tonight. maybe another day. i'll give u half credit, we are warming ourselves into the next ice age.

At this point who gives a shit if its warming or cooling or whatever lets just call it climate change and its getting rdy to kick our asses….

I always figured global thermonuclear war would get us. Still might, I suppose.

But if it doesn't, climate change is just about guaranteed to.