News

**Sir Lurks Alot.** lop guest User ID: 52422 10-19-2012 08:00 PM

From the London Daily Telegraph:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/go...treet.html

Google shares suspended as premature results stun Wall Street
Google’s shares crashed by as much as 11pc on Thursday, after the web search giant published its results prematurely and exposed a 20pc fall in its profits.

For more... click on link above...

And, from Zerohedge:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-10-18...e-else-did

44 analysts cover Google. 82% are Buys. Average Target Price is $811. The lowest and least herd-like was Heather Bellini of Goldman Sachs who has had a $660 price target (which is where GOOG is implied to trade currently) since 8/13/12. We wonder what Capstone's Rory Maher is thinking today with his $910 target?...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-10-18...-10-so-far

Here Is Why GOOG Has Plunged By 10% (So Far)

While everyone knows that GOOG is halted and may or may not resume trading before market close (and no, RRD merely reported the facts, if only early, and as everyone knows the market has a revulsion to reality peeking during trading hours), few are aware just why it is that everyone dumped the stock which soared to all time highs a few short weeks ago. Here it is, in its full visual splendor - Google's Operating Income, which was expected to come in at $3.536 billion printed at $2.736 billion, a 23% miss!

How far could Goog take down the market...???

Found this elsewhere but it seemed worth sharing.

Popcorn

**Sir Lurkes Alot.** lop guest User ID: 52422 10-19-2012 08:36 PM

No one Cares About The Google Machine eh?

Fair Enough. Heartflowers

**Kanigo2** lop guest User ID: 97971 10-19-2012 08:47 PM

Sir Lurks Alot. Wrote:

The lowest and least herd-like was Heather Bellini of Goldman Sachs who has had a $660 price target (which is where GOOG is implied to trade currently) since 8/13/12.

She knew nothing that the entire market hasn't know since may, that Google was implementing a program to place only advertisers in their search and that full implementation was going to happen by the fall.

Check the Sig line again.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

**Pope Barbie Imaculata**

Sir Lurkes Alot. Wrote:

No one Cares About The Google Machine eh?

Fair Enough.

How is this for caring.

Die Google Die. Die, die,die!!!!!

**Sir_Killalot** lop guest User ID: 14081 10-19-2012 09:24 PM

My pet..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sd7MnrQO7P4

Bring it! chuckle

**Sir Lurks Alot.** lop guest User ID: 52422 10-19-2012 09:48 PM

barbsat Wrote:

Sir Lurkes Alot. Wrote:
No one Cares About The Google Machine eh?

Fair Enough.

How is this for caring.

Die Google Die. Die, die,die!!!!!

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 52422 10-19-2012 09:51 PM

Kanigo2 Wrote:

Sir Lurks Alot. Wrote:
The lowest and least herd-like was Heather Bellini of Goldman Sachs who has had a $660 price target (which is where GOOG is implied to trade currently) since 8/13/12.

She knew nothing that the entire market hasn't know since may, that Google was implementing a program to place only advertisers in their search and that full implementation was going to happen by the fall.

Check the Sig line again.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

Nice.I hadnt noticed that before in your sig.

**JF Priest** · **JF Priest** Subscriber User ID: 47416 10-19-2012 09:53 PM **Posts: 23,875**

barbsat Wrote:

Sir Lurkes Alot. Wrote:
No one Cares About The Google Machine eh?

Fair Enough.

How is this for caring.

Die Google Die. Die, die,die!!!!!

**Joshua Flynn** · (This post was last modified: 10-19-2012 10:42 PM by Joshua Flynn.)

Personally after dealing with the hassle of searching with google, it is forcing me to use bing more and more.

One of many of google's classic search alterations include:

Searching for people named 'howard' when searching for terms like 'hoard' (because apparently if a word is one letter away from another it's somehow valid - I guess by this logic sid and side are similar?).

Omission of specific data in search terms and obscuring any searches for more controversial information (nazis, jews, etc) with only pro-western media garbage and red herring blog spam sites.

Inability to distinguish 'vegetarianism' from 'veganism' (apparently the former that consume animal products is the same as the latter that don't).

Corrections to words that aren't spelt incorrectly (usually verbatim spellings of quotes or british spellings of words).

Inability to accept literal spellings (for example, even in quotations it will still do the 'howard' 'hoard' misdirection rubbish).

As such I am moving progressively over to bing the worse the search criterion gets. Bing uses a more literal search method which I prefer to google's hassle laden search method.

**Leroy Jenkins!**

Sir_Killalot Wrote:

My pet..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sd7MnrQO7P4

Bring it!