News

**JF Priest** · **JF Priest** Subscriber User ID: 47416 08-13-2012 07:55 PM **Posts: 23,846**

This really needs no Intro.. Thanks to WeThePeople....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_zvAdzrQcQ

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 67012 08-13-2012 07:58 PM

The constitution gives Congress the right to levy taxes.
The same one Roberts used to uphold obamacare.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 91251 08-13-2012 08:02 PM

JF Priest Wrote:

This really needs no Intro.. Thanks to WeThePeople....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_zvAdzrQcQ

One cases sevral years ago ol law required tax collector to nail tax notice on front door guy took to court an won.probly changed trhat law. Jptdknpa

**Bob**

http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/jsiegel/P...tNoLaw.htm

**The Evil AC** I am not a number!!! User ID: 666 08-13-2012 08:07 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4giHRxuY...e=youtu.be

**SecretGeek**

This thread I created either explains it or shows a document containing proof in regards to the subject. If you can't find what I am referring to, let me know.
http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Oath

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 113262 08-13-2012 08:19 PM

" 16TH AMENDMENT

617 F.Supp. 237

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
George M. HOUSE and Marion M. House, Defendants.
Nos. G85-23-01 CR, G85-23-02 CR.
United States District Court,
W.D. Michigan.
June 7, 1985.

George M. House and Marion M. House, in pro. per.
Lowell H. Becraft, Jr., Huntsville, Ala., for defendants.
David M. Brown and Dana Boente, Dept. of Justice, Washington,
D.C., for plaintiff.

OPINION ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER MOTION TO DISMISS

MILES, Chief Judge.
Defendants were indicted on March 7, 1985 on seven counts of tax
evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. s 7201, and seven counts of failure to
file income tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. s 7203. Defendants
filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on April 12, 1985, claiming that
the sixteenth amendment which grants Congress the power to lay taxes was
never properly ratified, and that as a result, all laws that have been
passed pursuant to the authority granted by the sixteenth amendment are
null and void.
The Court denied defendants' motion to dismiss on April 30, 1985.
On May 21, 1985, the date noticed for jury selection, defendants submitted
a motion for reconsideration of their motion to dismiss on the basis that
the Court had not had the opportunity to consider all the evidence on the
subject of the ratification of the sixteenth amendment.
A hearing was held on Saturday, May 25, 1985. At that time
defendants introduced the testimony of William Benson, co-author of the
book, The Law That Never Was (1985). Mr. Benson testified that he had
researched the legislative history of the sixteenth amendment and had
discovered that in the ratification process only four states had passed
resolutions that quoted absolutely and accurately the sixteenth amendment
as proposed by Congress. All the other states which had allegedly passed
the amendment had in fact passed resolutions that in one or more ways
differed from the language of the Congressional resolution.
It is defendants' contention that Philander Knox, then Secretary
of State, was aware of the differences between the Congressional and the
state versions of the proposed amendment, but that he nevertheless
certified the amendment as having been ratified. This action, defendants
contend, was in violation of the law, and rendered void the certification
process. ..."

FULL BRIEF

**jdfearl**

If you decide to fight them, you had better know the system inside and out. Depends on the judge too, they will do what they want.

**Darkzen**

So... Which of you Masters wants a new apprentice ?

I AM CURRENTLY IN BATTLE WITH DRACO.

Income is currently being levyed.

UCC 1 and 3 almost complete.
I will be sending in my Declaration of Executor-ship.

I want to call irs today and have them cease and desist levy as I inform them there has been a misunderstanding at to My status not being a "Taxpayer" "But Executor of the Trust".

If you understand my lingo.... let's talk.

DZ

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 112748 08-13-2012 09:38 PM

Sigh this is really tired.

ITS A LAW BECAUSE THEY f*cking ENFORCE IT.

Splitting hairs over paper work and shit does NOTHING.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 97284 08-13-2012 09:39 PM

you guys know who else bought into this crap?

Wesley Snipes.

You know where he is now? Prison.
Also, see 16th Amendment. Grants the power to levy personal income tax. K thx bai.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 112748 08-13-2012 09:42 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

you guys know who else bought into this crap?

Wesley Snipes.

You know where he is now? Prison.
Also, see 16th Amendment. Grants the power to levy personal income tax. K thx bai.

No way Snipes got off completely they are just fabricating his jail time to cover up that there is no law.

Right guys?

Pi Infinity User ID: 3.14159265 08-13-2012 09:58 PM

jdfearl Wrote:

If you decide to fight them, you had better know the system inside and out. Depends on the judge too, they will do what they want.

I haven't had anything to do with the IRS in over 11 years. I won't give this government money and then b*tch about them from the other side of my mouth. It's my peaceful protest attempt and I fear jail may be in my future. But I'd rather live as a caged man, than as a free roaming slave. The coming generations deserve I do more for them.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 113108 08-13-2012 10:00 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

Sigh this is really tired.

ITS A LAW BECAUSE THEY f*cking ENFORCE IT.

THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT

**CountFapula**

JF Priest Wrote:

This really needs no Intro.. Thanks to WeThePeople....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_zvAdzrQcQ

JF... if you can pull this off and video tape it, I'll buy it. Otherwise, I'm saving my ass from going to jail. yes it does truly suck