News
news George Soros Switches From Physical Gold to Gold Stocks and That is Very Bullish for Gold Prices
news Four fireballs fall over U.S. in 24 hour period
news Russians drive over North Pole to Canada
news Concentrated Fukushima radioactive plume staying on narrow path toward U.S.
news How to Use Chinese Condiments
news Google’s Plan To Take Over The World
news 'Dead' man comes back to life at his funeral
news Visualizing The Silver Squeeze
news Geothermal Energy
news N.A Poe, Adam Kokesh and Others Arrested at Smokedown Prohibition Cannabis Protest in Philadelphia
news FEMA Plans Clear-Cutting 85,000 Berkeley and Oakland Trees
news Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls The News
news Woman who survived flesh-eating infection, receives bionic hands
news Billionaires Now Own American Politics
news Air Force Chemtrail Whistleblower Exposes Geoengineering
news Yahoo Japan suspects 22 million user IDs leaked: Kyodo
news Ruins of Lost City May Lurk Deep in Honduras Rain Forest
news Dark, massive asteroid to fly by Earth on May 31
news Greek addicts turn to deadly new drug 'sisa'
news How to Share Difficult Information with Friends

Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTFOMGlol?
lop guest
User ID: 110833
07-28-2012 01:21 AM

 



Post: #1
devil "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTF??? Where did ALL of these monsters come from?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoU7uekpW7g
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 110833
07-28-2012 01:21 AM

 



Post: #2
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 111247
07-28-2012 01:29 AM

 



Post: #3
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Scream1Hiding
Quote this message in a reply
daisy
lop guest
User ID: 48475
07-28-2012 01:30 AM

 



Post: #4
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTFOMGlol?  Wrote:
WTF??? Where did ALL of these monsters come from?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoU7uekpW7g

Blink
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 110413
07-28-2012 06:17 AM

 



Post: #5
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Bloomberg?
Quote this message in a reply
Groverdog
Registered User
User ID: 91318
07-28-2012 07:37 AM

Posts: 414



Post: #6
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
Quote this message in a reply
Blue Waffle
Registered User
User ID: 94484
07-28-2012 08:15 AM

Posts: 4,843



Post: #7
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Groverdog  Wrote:
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

Best description of an Acid Trip you'll ever read:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37203387/LSD25...-Pollution
Jhikpghf
Quote this message in a reply
Groverdog
Registered User
User ID: 91318
07-28-2012 11:11 AM

Posts: 414



Post: #8
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Blue Waffle  Wrote:
Groverdog  Wrote:
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.

Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
(This post was last modified: 07-28-2012 11:12 AM by Groverdog.) Quote this message in a reply
DirtyAnnie
Registered User
User ID: 108110
07-28-2012 02:31 PM

Posts: 6,500



Post: #9
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
that's shit their experimenting with on Plum Island that got away
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 40826
07-28-2012 02:51 PM

 



Post: #10
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTFOMGlol?  Wrote:
WTF??? Where did ALL of these monsters come from?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoU7uekpW7g

Plum Island.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 111387
07-28-2012 03:16 PM

 



Post: #11
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Groverdog  Wrote:
Blue Waffle  Wrote:
Groverdog  Wrote:
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
The reason they claim it's a pig is because pigs are not frightening to people. They are familiar animals, the same as raccoons. The people in government and MSM know that much of the public will believe anything the "news" tells them so they will give ridiculous "explanations" knowing that most of the public will swallow it. MSM fully exploits the blind trust that much of the public puts in them. Oh, and as far as being a raccoon. Raccoons are very furry critters, and even after being water logged animals with fur as thick as a raccoon's will not have all of it washed off. These are NOT raccoons either.
Quote this message in a reply
Groverdog
Registered User
User ID: 91318
07-28-2012 07:35 PM

Posts: 414



Post: #12
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
LoP Guest  Wrote:
Groverdog  Wrote:
Blue Waffle  Wrote:
Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
The reason they claim it's a pig is because pigs are not frightening to people. They are familiar animals, the same as raccoons. The people in government and MSM know that much of the public will believe anything the "news" tells them so they will give ridiculous "explanations" knowing that most of the public will swallow it. MSM fully exploits the blind trust that much of the public puts in them. Oh, and as far as being a raccoon. Raccoons are very furry critters, and even after being water logged animals with fur as thick as a raccoon's will not have all of it washed off. These are NOT raccoons either.

Feet are wrong for a pig, raccoon, or dog. I might buy that it was a dog because of the thick tail, but even that would be a stretch, and if it was, why not report it as so?

Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
Quote this message in a reply
Groverdog
Registered User
User ID: 91318
07-29-2012 07:17 AM

Posts: 414



Post: #13
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Bump because I want to know what animal this is.

Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
Quote this message in a reply
Oldmaninthecave85
Registered User
User ID: 102160
07-29-2012 07:24 AM

Posts: 226



Post: #14
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
its TPTB trying to play god again as usual and its scary.
Quote this message in a reply
Blue Waffle
Registered User
User ID: 94484
07-29-2012 07:40 AM

Posts: 4,843



Post: #15
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Groverdog  Wrote:
Blue Waffle  Wrote:
Groverdog  Wrote:
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
They claimed it was a pig likely because they're chock full O'dumbass...

Best description of an Acid Trip you'll ever read:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37203387/LSD25...-Pollution
Jhikpghf
Quote this message in a reply



Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1