|
Thread Rating:
- 2 Votes - 3 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
|
"Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
|
WTFOMGlol? lop guest User ID: 110833 07-28-2012 01:21 AM
|
"Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTF??? Where did ALL of these monsters come from?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoU7uekpW7g
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 110833 07-28-2012 01:21 AM
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 111247 07-28-2012 01:29 AM
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
|
|
|
|
daisy lop guest User ID: 48475 07-28-2012 01:30 AM
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTFOMGlol? Wrote:WTF??? Where did ALL of these monsters come from?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoU7uekpW7g
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 110413 07-28-2012 06:17 AM
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Bloomberg?
|
|
|
|
Groverdog Registered User User ID: 91318 07-28-2012 07:37 AM
Posts: 419
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.
Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
|
|
|
|
Blue Waffle Registered User User ID: 94484 07-28-2012 08:15 AM
Posts: 4,890
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Groverdog Wrote:The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.
Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.
Best description of an Acid Trip you'll ever read:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37203387/LSD25...-Pollution
|
|
|
|
Groverdog Registered User User ID: 91318 07-28-2012 11:11 AM
Posts: 419
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Blue Waffle Wrote:Groverdog Wrote:The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.
Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.
So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
|
|
|
(This post was last modified: 07-28-2012 11:12 AM by Groverdog.)
|
|
DirtyAnnie Registered User User ID: 108110 07-28-2012 02:31 PM
Posts: 7,247
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
that's shit their experimenting with on Plum Island that got away
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 40826 07-28-2012 02:51 PM
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTFOMGlol? Wrote:WTF??? Where did ALL of these monsters come from?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoU7uekpW7g
Plum Island.
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 111387 07-28-2012 03:16 PM
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Groverdog Wrote:Blue Waffle Wrote:Groverdog Wrote:The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.
Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.
So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
The reason they claim it's a pig is because pigs are not frightening to people. They are familiar animals, the same as raccoons. The people in government and MSM know that much of the public will believe anything the "news" tells them so they will give ridiculous "explanations" knowing that most of the public will swallow it. MSM fully exploits the blind trust that much of the public puts in them. Oh, and as far as being a raccoon. Raccoons are very furry critters, and even after being water logged animals with fur as thick as a raccoon's will not have all of it washed off. These are NOT raccoons either.
|
|
|
|
Groverdog Registered User User ID: 91318 07-28-2012 07:35 PM
Posts: 419
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
LoP Guest Wrote:Groverdog Wrote:Blue Waffle Wrote:Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.
So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
The reason they claim it's a pig is because pigs are not frightening to people. They are familiar animals, the same as raccoons. The people in government and MSM know that much of the public will believe anything the "news" tells them so they will give ridiculous "explanations" knowing that most of the public will swallow it. MSM fully exploits the blind trust that much of the public puts in them. Oh, and as far as being a raccoon. Raccoons are very furry critters, and even after being water logged animals with fur as thick as a raccoon's will not have all of it washed off. These are NOT raccoons either.
Feet are wrong for a pig, raccoon, or dog. I might buy that it was a dog because of the thick tail, but even that would be a stretch, and if it was, why not report it as so?
Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
|
|
|
|
Groverdog Registered User User ID: 91318 07-29-2012 07:17 AM
Posts: 419
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
 because I want to know what animal this is.
Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
|
|
|
|
Oldmaninthecave85 Registered User User ID: 102160 07-29-2012 07:24 AM
Posts: 226
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
its TPTB trying to play god again as usual and its scary.
|
|
|
|
Blue Waffle Registered User User ID: 94484 07-29-2012 07:40 AM
Posts: 4,890
|
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Groverdog Wrote:Blue Waffle Wrote:Groverdog Wrote:The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.
Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.
So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
They claimed it was a pig likely because they're chock full O'dumbass...
Best description of an Acid Trip you'll ever read:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37203387/LSD25...-Pollution
|
|
|
|
|