News
news Darpa Sets Out to Make Computers That Can Teach Themselves
news Groundwater shows massive spike in radioactive material at Fukushima Strontium-90 up over 10,000%
news Anti-Pervert Tights Become Internet Sensation in China. Gives girls legs Ron Jeremy look
news Elementary students suspended after pretending pencils were guns
news Turmeric produces mind-blowing recovery from dementia symptoms, multiple case studies show
news DuckDuckGo search engine sees rocketing growth after NSA revelations
news Massive Worldwide Bee Decline Continues as Pesticide Companies Ramp Up the PR
news Is Your Taste In Music Influenced By The Shape Of Your Skull?
news Obama and His Allies Say the Govt Doesn't Listen to Your Phone Calls — But the FBI Begs to Differ
news Nestle: Water’s Corporate Takeover
news Eyeball Licking Sex Craze Sweeps Japan
news The Supreme Court Decided Your Silence Can Be Used Against You
news Putin: Syrian Rebels Eat Human Flesh
news Accident Rates Rise At Intersections With Speed Cameras
news The "Ocean Moon" --Future Missions to Explore Jupiter's Europa
news Plastic Bags Fool Sea Turtles Into Hunting Them
news Magnetic Pole Shift May Happen Sooner than Expected
news Venezuelans download new app which helps locate TOILET PAPER as stock runs low
news How Do Death Valley’s “Sailing Stones” Move Themselves Across the Desert?
news School Holds Toy Gun Buyback Program

Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTFOMGlol?
lop guest
User ID: 110833
07-28-2012 01:21 AM

 



Post: #1
devil "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTF??? Where did ALL of these monsters come from?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoU7uekpW7g
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 110833
07-28-2012 01:21 AM

 



Post: #2
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 111247
07-28-2012 01:29 AM

 



Post: #3
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Scream1Hiding
Quote this message in a reply
daisy
lop guest
User ID: 48475
07-28-2012 01:30 AM

 



Post: #4
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTFOMGlol?  Wrote:
WTF??? Where did ALL of these monsters come from?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoU7uekpW7g

Blink
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 110413
07-28-2012 06:17 AM

 



Post: #5
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Bloomberg?
Quote this message in a reply
Groverdog
Registered User
User ID: 91318
07-28-2012 07:37 AM

Posts: 419



Post: #6
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
Quote this message in a reply
Blue Waffle
Registered User
User ID: 94484
07-28-2012 08:15 AM

Posts: 4,890



Post: #7
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Groverdog  Wrote:
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

Best description of an Acid Trip you'll ever read:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37203387/LSD25...-Pollution
Jhikpghf
Quote this message in a reply
Groverdog
Registered User
User ID: 91318
07-28-2012 11:11 AM

Posts: 419



Post: #8
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Blue Waffle  Wrote:
Groverdog  Wrote:
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.

Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
(This post was last modified: 07-28-2012 11:12 AM by Groverdog.) Quote this message in a reply
DirtyAnnie
Registered User
User ID: 108110
07-28-2012 02:31 PM

Posts: 7,247



Post: #9
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
that's shit their experimenting with on Plum Island that got away
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 40826
07-28-2012 02:51 PM

 



Post: #10
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
WTFOMGlol?  Wrote:
WTF??? Where did ALL of these monsters come from?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoU7uekpW7g

Plum Island.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 111387
07-28-2012 03:16 PM

 



Post: #11
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Groverdog  Wrote:
Blue Waffle  Wrote:
Groverdog  Wrote:
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
The reason they claim it's a pig is because pigs are not frightening to people. They are familiar animals, the same as raccoons. The people in government and MSM know that much of the public will believe anything the "news" tells them so they will give ridiculous "explanations" knowing that most of the public will swallow it. MSM fully exploits the blind trust that much of the public puts in them. Oh, and as far as being a raccoon. Raccoons are very furry critters, and even after being water logged animals with fur as thick as a raccoon's will not have all of it washed off. These are NOT raccoons either.
Quote this message in a reply
Groverdog
Registered User
User ID: 91318
07-28-2012 07:35 PM

Posts: 419



Post: #12
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
LoP Guest  Wrote:
Groverdog  Wrote:
Blue Waffle  Wrote:
Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
The reason they claim it's a pig is because pigs are not frightening to people. They are familiar animals, the same as raccoons. The people in government and MSM know that much of the public will believe anything the "news" tells them so they will give ridiculous "explanations" knowing that most of the public will swallow it. MSM fully exploits the blind trust that much of the public puts in them. Oh, and as far as being a raccoon. Raccoons are very furry critters, and even after being water logged animals with fur as thick as a raccoon's will not have all of it washed off. These are NOT raccoons either.

Feet are wrong for a pig, raccoon, or dog. I might buy that it was a dog because of the thick tail, but even that would be a stretch, and if it was, why not report it as so?

Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
Quote this message in a reply
Groverdog
Registered User
User ID: 91318
07-29-2012 07:17 AM

Posts: 419



Post: #13
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Bump because I want to know what animal this is.

Peace, Love, and Cold Beer.
Quote this message in a reply
Oldmaninthecave85
Registered User
User ID: 102160
07-29-2012 07:24 AM

Posts: 226



Post: #14
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
its TPTB trying to play god again as usual and its scary.
Quote this message in a reply
Blue Waffle
Registered User
User ID: 94484
07-29-2012 07:40 AM

Posts: 4,890



Post: #15
RE: "Manhattan Monster" Discovered (NYC 2012) Another Creature Carcass (?)
Groverdog  Wrote:
Blue Waffle  Wrote:
Groverdog  Wrote:
The official story is this is a pig that someone cooked, and then threw in the water and it got washed up. If I am supposed to believe this is a pig, then I will also believe in reptilian shape-shifters because pigs do NOT have 5 toes, nor a long, thick tail. Stop the video at 3:04 and look, very clearly has toes, not pigs feet. Don't believe me, check out a jar of pickled pigs feet, or pull up a picture of "Pig Foot" and compare. If anyone has a job at the Parks Department, and all the employees that saw this agreed it was a pig with 5 toes and a fat tail, and destroyed it, they need to be fired because they have just destroyed the only pig ever found without split hooves. Also, NO ONE that is going to take the time to smoke a pig would forget the fact that you have to "clean" it, IE: remove the pig poop filled intestines, stomach, etc, and any pig you buy from a farm or store that was slaughtered and sold as a whole pig for cooking would have come already cleaned.
I am not saying that this is 100% proof of government genetic splicing, but there is 0% chance that this is a pig, and whoever took it and destroyed it HAD to know this, or needs to lose their job at the Parks Department, not to mention the fact that not a single "reporter" had the brains to Google what a pig looks like.

Montauk monster was a dead bloated raccoon with a messed up face. This is the same thing. "Teeth" in upper jaw actually look like shattered upper jaw and nasal cavities exposed. Earlier pics in OP video looked like dead otter pics. Hair falls off once they've been dead awhile, body bloats...
The feet are the tell.

So why did they claim it as a pig, when it has toes and not hooves? Oh, and yes, its face looks to have been beaten in or run over, but that doesn't explain the feet and tail.
They claimed it was a pig likely because they're chock full O'dumbass...

Best description of an Acid Trip you'll ever read:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37203387/LSD25...-Pollution
Jhikpghf
Quote this message in a reply



Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1