News

**Black H@t**

In a stunning development, President-elect Enrique Peña and his Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), who won control of Mexico’s government on July 1st, moved to dissolve the Agencia Federal de Investigación (AFI).

Modeled after the United States FBI, the AFI was founded in 2001 to crack down on Mexico’s pervasive government corruption and drug trafficking. With rival drug cartels murdering between 47,500 to 67,000 Mexicans over the last six years, the move by the PRI represents the total surrender of Mexico’s sovereignty back to the money and violence of Mexico’s two main drug cartels, the Sinaloa Federation and Los Zetas. Coupled with the Obama Administration’s “Dreamer” Executive Order curtailing deportations of illegal aliens, a hands-off policy on both sides of the border foreshadows a huge increase in “narco-trafficking” violence and corruption flooding into the United States.

The PRI ruled Mexico with an iron fist for 71 years between 1929 and 2000. Although the PRI claimed they were the socialist peasant’s party, they operated as a corrupt political organization that siphoned off wealth from Mexico’s nationalized oil industry with bribes for protecting the drug cartels that trafficked in marijuana and narcotics into the United States. As a glaring example of the level of official PRI corruption, in 1982 the oil workers’ union donated a $2 million house as a "gift" to President López Portillo. Mexicans often joke: “Our Presidents are elected as millionaires, but they leave office as billionaires.”

But on December 1, 2000, Vicente Fox, the former Chief Executive of Coca-Cola in Mexico and founder of the Partido Acción Nacional (PAN), was elected President of Mexico. Mr. Fox ran on a platform of reforming Mexico’s pervasive police corruption, and his first move as President was to form the AFI. Under the leadership of President Fox and his party’s successor, President Felipe Calderón, the AFI grew over the next 11 years into a 5,000-member force with an international reputation as a premier drug enforcement agency. The U.S. provided extensive equipment and training to the AFI. The AFI reciprocated by capturing numerous drug kingpins and extraditing them to face criminal prosecution for murder and drug distribution in the U.S.

Over the first six months of 2012, the Sinaloa Federation and Los Zetas carried out a vicious war across Mexico to expand their areas of operations and intimidate the local population. Both cartels engaged in “information operations campaigns” by displaying large numbers of dismembered bodies in public places. The shock value of body dumps was designed to broadcast that the cartels are the dominant authority in Mexico.

Source: Cheer

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/...LIZE-DRUGS

**FRIED_RICE**

**geminigirl** · (This post was last modified: 08-03-2012 02:12 AM by geminigirl.)

Wait a minute...he was elected, but not sworn in yet right? You can't make laws before that. I thought the PRI dissolution has been going on for years?

I had to edit. I'm getting their abbreviations confused.

**TheLOVETroll**

IDK would legalizing take power away from the cartels by making the product available mainstream? This guy may get shot.

**Sweety Pie** · (This post was last modified: 08-03-2012 02:40 AM by Sweety Pie.)

The war on drugs has been lost by those that declared it.

It is just a matter of time for the world to recognize this fact and start on a new strategy.

It takes a lot of courage to be the first to do it. I am worried about the president elect safety. doomed

**freebyrd**

he is not very popular with the mexicans
millions are in the streets protesting his presidency
if this move is true and not some political ploy then he is going to be very unpopular with the gringos in DC too

i predict the locals dragging him out to string him from a lamp post just as a cia snipers bullet blows his brains out

stupid spork

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 111185 08-03-2012 03:25 AM

ArchNemesis Wrote:

IDK would legalizing take power away from the cartels by making the product available mainstream? This guy may get shot.

Good call. If he gets away with this, it could possibly destroy the entire United States police state power.

If Mexico legalizes drugs, it will bring such an incredible amount more of drugs into the US in a very short time that the US will have to respond likewise.

It won't happen.

**King_David** · (This post was last modified: 08-03-2012 03:27 AM by King_David.)

I don't know what anyone expects him to do, the "War on Drugs" in Mexico is like a Civil War.

Do you expect him to " Tough it out" like Lincoln did until Millions of his own countrymen are dead in the street?

The level of violence in Mexico sense 2000 has raisin out of control, this is why the people put the PRI back in power.

Amsterdam does not have these sort of troubles, that says everything that needs to be said. Turn Mexico into a large "Red Light District" and let those morons in Washington fight their own damn war at the border.

We could use some more border security anyway.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 111697 08-03-2012 03:28 AM

(popcorn)

munch munch :)

**King_David**

LoP Guest Wrote:

ArchNemesis Wrote:
IDK would legalizing take power away from the cartels by making the product available mainstream? This guy may get shot.

Good call. If he gets away with this, it could possibly destroy the entire United States police state power.

If Mexico legalizes drugs, it will bring such an incredible amount more of drugs into the US in a very short time that the US will have to respond likewise.

It won't happen.

I think less drugs would come into the US, and more people would just go to Mexico to get stoned.

**Onthehook** lop guest User ID: 67797 08-03-2012 03:33 AM

hope the guy has good bodyguards, CIA no likey

**King_David**

There's likely a reason he's announcing this now, before he's in power and can actually do it,

I foresee a BIG CHECK headed from Washington to Mexico and that's the last we'll ever hear of this.

**Salty**

The only problem I see is they'll still be able to profit from the U.S. because the price is high enough because the risk involved is high.

**King_David**

Salty Wrote:

The only problem I see is they'll still be able to profit from the U.S. because the price is high enough because the risk involved is high.

The US State Department will cry like bitches about all the international treaties that bind Mexico to stop Narco traffic.

There are a ton of treaties dating back to the early 1900's to stop the Opium trade. Mexico is party to most of them, so they will have to withdraw or enforce the treaties or the US may bring the dreaded UN Sanctions.

There's just too much dirty money on the line from everyone from the Prison Industrial Complex, to the Big Bank, to the Police and Court System, right back to Washington.

They will never allow Mexico to show the World how the "War on Drugs" is what is really responsible for all the killing, and they can't allow Mexico to show how legalizing and regulating drugs can be a success, because then the US population would no longer be fooled.

**quest** lop guest User ID: 76473 08-03-2012 04:30 AM

I dont expect they will really legalize drugs. I just think they will sort of 'decriminalise' violent gangs, and leave drugs ilegal so they will remain profitable, and they still have the option to bust innocent users, and those who might compete with the cartels. I suppose the same 'movement' that set us up with our currant corrupt administration, put one up in Mexico too, for a matched cooperative set.
It follows the cartels will substantially move into America and become wealthy citizens. With them will come the horrible violence. If drugs were legal it would take a giant bite out of their organisation.

a/o/b he also says

Quote:I'm in favor of opening a new debate in the strategy in the way we fight drug trafficking. It is quite clear that after several years of this fight against drug trafficking, we have more drug consumption, drug use and drug trafficking. That means we are not moving in the right direction. Things are not working.

My guess is that he means to shift the 'emphasis' to the user in the United States. As I think the last ruler of Mexico said, 'It is the user that fuels the drug trafficing.' He blamed the American consumer for the drug trafficing and the resulting gang violence in Mexico.

Me? you know,, call me crazy, but I would bust the violent gangs that are murdering people instead. And not bust the people using it at all. As I said. Make it legal, and the gangs make no profit from it. They would probly turn to other organised crime tricks, but the US consumer is not so enthusiastic about extortion, and other actually bad stuff. I spose prostitution would have to be legalised topo, or they would try to corner that maket too/instead, and that ciould be more of a horror show than gang run drug trafficing.

1. Make benign stuff legal
2. actually bust bad stuff, even if it is perpetrated by 'immigrants'.
3. Even if they are 'the administration' :nono:

Some people,, :suspect: ,, would find it suspicious that even though the goal of the 'administration' was to bust innocent 'survivalists',, some people would find it suspicious that the means they used towards that end, was to sell these Mexican gangters guns!