News
news Was Roswell UFO Crash A Secret Nazi Aircraft?
news London museum planned to ‘shoot and steal Nessie’
news The Real-Life Journey to the Center of the Earth That Almost Was
news Why Your Cat Thinks You're an Idiot
news Personal helicopter will be as easy to drive as a car
news Infrared Nessie photograph to be revealed
news Scientists Make Progress on Building a More Mammoth-Like Elephant
news US Military Taking Action in Response to Climate Change
news Largest Sunspot in Decades Sending Solar Flares at Earth
news Connection Between Easter Islanders and Native Americans Revealed
news The largest city in Brazil is running dangerously low on water

Advertisement



Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 3.4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
rout
omicron
User ID: 57593
10-20-2011 10:50 PM

Posts: 5,526



Post: #1
NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement

LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 56043
10-20-2011 11:57 PM

 



Post: #2
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
NME  Wrote: (10-20-2011 10:50 PM)
http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/587491/8...fo%29.html

the pictures are of nonsensical looking uneven and messy things that look nothing like a ship which would have a shape and neatness to it

i do not know why people like "UFO" videos and pics where its something super messy and uneven looking that doesnt resemble a ship at all. I find that to be profoundly bizarre and odd that messy looking ones arent filtered out and disliked, but rather are liked and posted.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 56043
10-20-2011 11:59 PM

 



Post: #3
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
Heres some of the ugly, uneven asymmetrical looking pics without a video with an extra long narcissistic mentally ill intro and bad music :

http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/images/ISD...724-68.jpg

http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/images/ISD...724-66.jpg
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 56043
10-21-2011 12:01 AM

 



Post: #4
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
WHy in the world stuff that looks like junk with shit sticking out of it be liked, i have no idea. You would think only the triangles, spheres, cigar rods, saucers, and ones that look like actual ships would be the only ones liked and posted. weird.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 48675
10-21-2011 12:17 AM

 



Post: #5
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
User ID: 56043 you are thinking like a typical human. Get your head outside of human invention and deal with it.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 57452
10-21-2011 01:07 AM

 



Post: #6
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 16731
10-21-2011 01:11 AM

 



Post: #7
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-21-2011 12:17 AM)
User ID: 56043 you are thinking like a typical human. Get your head outside of human invention and deal with it.

To the contrary, he's RIGHT.

If a UFO is indeed considered to be an alien spacecraft of one kind or another, it would still need to adhere to the laws of physics that drive most design criteria.

A UFO is NOT going to look like a piece of space debris or other orbital junk, of which there are THOUSANDS up there going around in perpetuity.

It is also not going to be an amorphous ball of light or other non-physical form.

If you want me - and the MAJORITY - of people who basically accept the premise that these things exist, to believe your picture or video, we need to see structural detail, markings, and physical characteristics in general that would by definition need to be appearent in such a craft.

All of these glowing orbs and other nonsense that is passed off as 'UFOs' is nothing but a butt-load of new-age transcendental feel-good malarky that is explicable by other means that make the purveyors of such drivel look like a bunch of tards.

You want me to believe what you're showing me? Let's see panel lines, unit ID insignia, weapons hardpoints, propulsion detail, viewports, ANYTHING except yet another blob of smudges and bouncing kitchen lights reflected in your window!

Until then...
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 45164
10-21-2011 01:32 AM

 



Post: #8
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
I have seen these pics before six months to a year ago, the story that was attached to them at the time was that it was an ancient satellite with a very unusual orbit that we have no idea how to recreate. Most satellites orbit east to west, but this one orbits north to south.
Quote this message in a reply
ashesandsackcloth
Registered User
User ID: 14769
10-21-2011 01:38 AM

Posts: 9,022



Post: #9
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-21-2011 01:11 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-21-2011 12:17 AM)
User ID: 56043 you are thinking like a typical human. Get your head outside of human invention and deal with it.

To the contrary, he's RIGHT.

If a UFO is indeed considered to be an alien spacecraft of one kind or another, it would still need to adhere to the laws of physics that drive most design criteria.

A UFO is NOT going to look like a piece of space debris or other orbital junk, of which there are THOUSANDS up there going around in perpetuity.

It is also not going to be an amorphous ball of light or other non-physical form.

If you want me - and the MAJORITY - of people who basically accept the premise that these things exist, to believe your picture or video, we need to see structural detail, markings, and physical characteristics in general that would by definition need to be appearent in such a craft.

All of these glowing orbs and other nonsense that is passed off as 'UFOs' is nothing but a butt-load of new-age transcendental feel-good malarky that is explicable by other means that make the purveyors of such drivel look like a bunch of tards.

You want me to believe what you're showing me? Let's see panel lines, unit ID insignia, weapons hardpoints, propulsion detail, viewports, ANYTHING except yet another blob of smudges and bouncing kitchen lights reflected in your window!

Until then...

So a cube ship would be within your limits.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 38738
10-21-2011 01:51 AM

 



Post: #10
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
some alien tech is said to emit a plasma around the entire craft which could explain the fuzzy lights in the sky
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 16731
10-21-2011 02:30 AM

 



Post: #11
RE: NASA STS 88 Pics Unknown Spacecraft (UFO)
ashesandsackcloth  Wrote: (10-21-2011 01:38 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-21-2011 01:11 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (10-21-2011 12:17 AM)
User ID: 56043 you are thinking like a typical human. Get your head outside of human invention and deal with it.

To the contrary, he's RIGHT.

If a UFO is indeed considered to be an alien spacecraft of one kind or another, it would still need to adhere to the laws of physics that drive most design criteria.

A UFO is NOT going to look like a piece of space debris or other orbital junk, of which there are THOUSANDS up there going around in perpetuity.

It is also not going to be an amorphous ball of light or other non-physical form.

If you want me - and the MAJORITY - of people who basically accept the premise that these things exist, to believe your picture or video, we need to see structural detail, markings, and physical characteristics in general that would by definition need to be appearent in such a craft.

All of these glowing orbs and other nonsense that is passed off as 'UFOs' is nothing but a butt-load of new-age transcendental feel-good malarky that is explicable by other means that make the purveyors of such drivel look like a bunch of tards.

You want me to believe what you're showing me? Let's see panel lines, unit ID insignia, weapons hardpoints, propulsion detail, viewports, ANYTHING except yet another blob of smudges and bouncing kitchen lights reflected in your window!

Until then...

So a cube ship would be within your limits.

Most likely, it could.

These days with photoshop and CGI applications for video though, it is getting harder all the time to tell real from fake.

There have been some VERY convincing fakes put out there.

On that point, it's even getting to the point where photogapic and video evidence might become inadmissable in court for the same reason.

A motivated individual can manufacture anything on a hard drive that they can dream up and make it look convincing.
Quote this message in a reply












Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1