News

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 30606 05-01-2012 06:36 PM

Obama Information Czar Confronted Over “Ban Conspiracy Theories” Paper

During a rare public appearance, the Obama Administration’s Information Czar Cass Sunstein told a crowd gathered at he NYU Law School in NYC yesterday that he has little recollection of writing a 2008 paper that called for a ban on conspiracy theorizing.

http://www.infowars.com/obama-informatio...ies-paper/

**Devout Agnostic** · (This post was last modified: 05-01-2012 06:39 PM by Devout Agnostic.)

"I don't recall..." writing a published paper.

**The Comedian**

Devout Agnostic Wrote:

"I don't recall..." writing a published paper.

That's soon going to morph into citations of the 5th Amendment.

**The Evil AC** I am not a number!!! User ID: 666 05-01-2012 06:42 PM

Devout Agnostic Wrote:

"I don't recall..." writing a published paper.

yep what a POS typical of the Obama crowd. Anon

**DanfromtheHills**

Devout Agnostic Wrote:

"I don't recall..." writing a published paper.

I have more faith in David Bowie's comment that he forgot 1974 because he took too much LSD that year.

**The Evil AC** I am not a number!!! User ID: 666 05-01-2012 06:57 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

he has little recollection of writing a 2008 paper that called for a ban on conspiracy theorizing

Thats because one of his butt buddies probably wrote it

~~HarryCanyon~~ · **~~HarryCanyon~~** Banned User ID: 92408 05-01-2012 06:58 PM **Posts: 626**

How does this work exactly, talk about 1984 and orwell.

The paper did not really call for anything of the sort, it mentioned it as one of many possible options.

The whole thing was written for people who know NOTHING about conspiracy bullshit its why all of the basics were covered.

I recall you people knee jerking about it then and you were wrong, instead of modifying your bullshit you just kept that incorrect mentality and here we are again?

DID ANY OF YOU ACTUALLY READ IT?

Why the f*ck am my time again if you guys are just going to rewrite history as you go along..

I guess this just get put on the same "wrong but i believe it anyway" bullshit like brietbarts corner being taken out..

**JF Priest** · **JF Priest** Subscriber User ID: 47416 05-01-2012 07:01 PM **Posts: 24,028**

DanfromtheHills Wrote:

Devout Agnostic Wrote:
"I don't recall..." writing a published paper.

I have more faith in David Bowie's comment that he forgot 1974 because he took too much LSD that year.

**Devout Agnostic**

The Evil AC Wrote:

Devout Agnostic Wrote:
"I don't recall..." writing a published paper.

yep what a POS typical of the Obama crowd.

Yep. If by "Obama crowd" you mean American Oligarchs.

[Image: reagan.jpg]

**Devout Agnostic**

HarryCanyon Wrote:

The paper did not really call for anything of the sort, it mentioned it as one of many possible options.

The whole thing was written for people who know NOTHING about conspiracy bullshit its why all of the basics were covered.

I recall you people knee jerking about it then and you were wrong, instead of modifying your bullshit you just kept that incorrect mentality and here we are again?

DID ANY OF YOU ACTUALLY READ IT?

Did you?

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?a...id=1084585

Page 1:

Quote:
Conspiracy Theories

Cass R. Sunstein *

Adrian Vermeule **

Abstract
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined.

**BloodRed**

Devout Agnostic Wrote:

HarryCanyon Wrote:
The paper did not really call for anything of the sort, it mentioned it as one of many possible options.

The whole thing was written for people who know NOTHING about conspiracy bullshit its why all of the basics were covered.

I recall you people knee jerking about it then and you were wrong, instead of modifying your bullshit you just kept that incorrect mentality and here we are again?

DID ANY OF YOU ACTUALLY READ IT?

Did you?

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?a...id=1084585

Page 1:

Quote:
Conspiracy Theories

Cass R. Sunstein *

Adrian Vermeule **

Abstract
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxIxu_quw...ure=fvwrel

Bump

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 93919 05-01-2012 07:25 PM

Devout Agnostic Wrote:

HarryCanyon Wrote:
The paper did not really call for anything of the sort, it mentioned it as one of many possible options.

The whole thing was written for people who know NOTHING about conspiracy bullshit its why all of the basics were covered.

I recall you people knee jerking about it then and you were wrong, instead of modifying your bullshit you just kept that incorrect mentality and here we are again?

DID ANY OF YOU ACTUALLY READ IT?

Did you?

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?a...id=1084585

Page 1:

Quote:
Conspiracy Theories

Cass R. Sunstein *

Adrian Vermeule **

Abstract
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 93919 05-01-2012 07:25 PM

BloodRed Wrote:

Devout Agnostic Wrote:
HarryCanyon Wrote:
The paper did not really call for anything of the sort, it mentioned it as one of many possible options.

The whole thing was written for people who know NOTHING about conspiracy bullshit its why all of the basics were covered.

I recall you people knee jerking about it then and you were wrong, instead of modifying your bullshit you just kept that incorrect mentality and here we are again?

DID ANY OF YOU ACTUALLY READ IT?

Did you?

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?a...id=1084585

Page 1:

Quote:
Conspiracy Theories

Cass R. Sunstein *

Adrian Vermeule **

Abstract
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxIxu_quw...ure=fvwrel

HC likes to eat crow.

**Ahriman**

I'm not even gonna make a bet Mr Sunstein is a dual citizen.

I'd hate to win so easily.

lol

~~HarryCanyon~~ · **~~HarryCanyon~~** Banned User ID: 92408 05-01-2012 07:30 PM **Posts: 626**

LoP Guest Wrote:

BloodRed Wrote:
Devout Agnostic Wrote:
Did you?

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?a...id=1084585

Page 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxIxu_quw...ure=fvwrel

HC likes to eat crow.

No this is one of the typical cases where you guys want single sentences and silver bullet byte sized answers and they are not there to give.

The whole thing has to be taken in context, it would take entirely too much time to break it all down for faith driven people who do not care anyway.