Post: #1

President Obama has been caught in a web of deception that threatens to ensnarl his re-election bid. Multiple emails and diplomatic cables reveal that the administration deliberately deceived the public. Libyagate haunts Mr. Obama, relentlessly eroding his credibility and trustworthiness. It is a stake aimed at the heart of his presidency.

For nearly two weeks, the Obama team claimed the attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi resulted from “spontaneous protests” in response to an anti-Muslim video. That was false — and Mr. Obama knew it. Several senior State Department officials testified at congressional hearings that there were no protests on Sept. 11, 2012. In fact, our diplomatic mission had been quiet all day. Moreover, the State Department was monitoring the compound practically in real time. On video, State Department officials witnessed scores of armed men breach the consulate and begin shooting at our diplomats. The officials’ obvious conclusion: It was a terrorist assault. Within 24 hours, the CIA’s station chief in Libya also reported jihadists had perpetrated the attack.

The latest evidence, however, is a bombshell: Two hours after the assault began, the State Department sent an email to numerous agencies — including the White House Situation Room — that Ansar al-Sharia, a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda, had claimed responsibility. The email went directly to the White House's Executive Office — the president’s inner circle. In other words, from nearly the beginning, Mr. Obama knew the Benghazi attack was a terrorist atrocity. Yet he insisted on blaming a phantom protest and an obscure YouTube video. He misled the public in a desperate attempt to cover up his administration’s colossal failure.

Why? The answer is cynical politics. One of Mr. Obama’s central campaign narratives is that he killed Osama bin Laden and badly degraded al Qaeda. The Benghazi attack, however, directly contradicts the administration’s position. Rather than being in retreat, al Qaeda is on the rise. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Mali, Iraq and Libya — the Islamic fascist network has been expanding its safe havens and jihadist activity in every one of these nations.

In particular, Libya has been transformed into a failed Islamist state. Contrary to media spin, Mr. Obama’s military intervention in Libya has been a disaster. Jihadists roam the countryside, targeting minorities and seeking to impose Shariah law. More than 20,000 weapons formerly controlled by late strongman Moammar Gadhafi were stolen by al Qaeda militants. The country’s eastern provinces are nearly in open revolt, fueled by a Muslim insurgency. In fact, the Benghazi attack occurred for one primary reason: Mr. Obama’s war has made Libya safe for radical Islam. Hence, the president feared that the truth about his Libyan intervention would come out. The result is that Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was murdered, along with three other U.S. diplomatic personnel. Mr. Obama has American blood on his hands.

more!

Read more: http://times247.com/articles/kuhner-obam...z2ASqReVDz

Post: #2

Myth #3: Obama lied about Benghazi

The other problem with the Republican effort to manufacture outrage about Benghazi is that it’s blatantly immoral and hypocritical. If you don’t think so, ask yourself this question: should Democrats have immediately attacked President Bush for 9/11? Should they have said that he wanted those people to die (as those on the right have said about Obama) within a couple months of the attacks? Look, I’ll admit, after the dust settled and we began to look at what happened more closely, there were many on the Left, including myself, that said Bush was incompetent, and that if he’d been more concerned about the terrorist threat, 9/11 may not have happened. But nearly all Americans had enough sense, decency, and respect for those who lost their lives not to piss on their graves—especially not right after it happened. So if Republicans are really so concerned about those who lost their lives in Benghazi, perhaps they should honor their work and what they stood for, rather than trying to score political points by making it seem as if they lost their lives needlessly—to those of us paying attention, it’s pathetically desperate.

http://chuckingrocks.com/?p=305

Post: #3

AC488  Wrote:

Myth #3: Obama lied about Benghazi

The other problem with the Republican effort to manufacture outrage about Benghazi is that it’s blatantly immoral and hypocritical. If you don’t think so, ask yourself this question: should Democrats have immediately attacked President Bush for 9/11? Should they have said that he wanted those people to die (as those on the right have said about Obama) within a couple months of the attacks? Look, I’ll admit, after the dust settled and we began to look at what happened more closely, there were many on the Left, including myself, that said Bush was incompetent, and that if he’d been more concerned about the terrorist threat, 9/11 may not have happened. But nearly all Americans had enough sense, decency, and respect for those who lost their lives not to piss on their graves—especially not right after it happened. So if Republicans are really so concerned about those who lost their lives in Benghazi, perhaps they should honor their work and what they stood for, rather than trying to score political points by making it seem as if they lost their lives needlessly—to those of us paying attention, it’s pathetically desperate.

http://chuckingrocks.com/?p=305

your logic is laughable. 9/11 and the Bengazi debacle is alike comparing apples to oranges. This article looks like it was written by a 3rd grade libtard with all the hallmarks of circular logic and fallacy, usually based on emotions and not logic.

Obama knew. Kick this piece of shit out of office

http://www.worldtribune.com/2012/10/26/b.../#comments

Post: #4

AC488  Wrote:

Myth #3: Obama lied about Benghazi

The other problem with the Republican effort to manufacture outrage about Benghazi is that it’s blatantly immoral and hypocritical. If you don’t think so, ask yourself this question: should Democrats have immediately attacked President Bush for 9/11? Should they have said that he wanted those people to die (as those on the right have said about Obama) within a couple months of the attacks? Look, I’ll admit, after the dust settled and we began to look at what happened more closely, there were many on the Left, including myself, that said Bush was incompetent, and that if he’d been more concerned about the terrorist threat, 9/11 may not have happened. But nearly all Americans had enough sense, decency, and respect for those who lost their lives not to piss on their graves—especially not right after it happened. So if Republicans are really so concerned about those who lost their lives in Benghazi, perhaps they should honor their work and what they stood for, rather than trying to score political points by making it seem as if they lost their lives needlessly—to those of us paying attention, it’s pathetically desperate.

http://chuckingrocks.com/?p=305

You exactly right. I don't care for Obama, in fact he sucks, but the reich's propaganda is so absurd this year it is making the McLame/Barbie campaign look good.

Post: #5

He got out of gun running in Mexico,, So IMHO.. This to shall pass..

Post: #6

They all lie.

Post: #7

Nobody knows what happened, all rumours. Like with his BC and destroying What happened is what happens in all wars, what is happening for 12 years, and that is people dying. Probably you and the media and conservatives now making this an issue means that wrong people need to go, wrong decision will be made, just to please the media and or politicians.

What happened was not a big atrocity. All this is just games.

Post: #8

AC488  Wrote:

Myth #3: Obama lied about Benghazi

The other problem with the Republican effort to manufacture outrage about Benghazi is that it’s blatantly immoral and hypocritical. If you don’t think so, ask yourself this question: should Democrats have immediately attacked President Bush for 9/11? Should they have said that he wanted those people to die (as those on the right have said about Obama) within a couple months of the attacks? Look, I’ll admit, after the dust settled and we began to look at what happened more closely, there were many on the Left, including myself, that said Bush was incompetent, and that if he’d been more concerned about the terrorist threat, 9/11 may not have happened. But nearly all Americans had enough sense, decency, and respect for those who lost their lives not to piss on their graves—especially not right after it happened. So if Republicans are really so concerned about those who lost their lives in Benghazi, perhaps they should honor their work and what they stood for, rather than trying to score political points by making it seem as if they lost their lives needlessly—to those of us paying attention, it’s pathetically desperate.

http://chuckingrocks.com/?p=305

But Bush did do 911. He should have been blamed for it. It was a total failure on the left to let him get away with such heinous crime. They wouldn't go there because there was clear involvement by the Jews. The left is owned by Israel and the neocon right is owned by Israel.

Post: #9

LoP Guest  Wrote:

AC488  Wrote:

Myth #3: Obama lied about Benghazi

The other problem with the Republican effort to manufacture outrage about Benghazi is that it’s blatantly immoral and hypocritical. If you don’t think so, ask yourself this question: should Democrats have immediately attacked President Bush for 9/11? Should they have said that he wanted those people to die (as those on the right have said about Obama) within a couple months of the attacks? Look, I’ll admit, after the dust settled and we began to look at what happened more closely, there were many on the Left, including myself, that said Bush was incompetent, and that if he’d been more concerned about the terrorist threat, 9/11 may not have happened. But nearly all Americans had enough sense, decency, and respect for those who lost their lives not to piss on their graves—especially not right after it happened. So if Republicans are really so concerned about those who lost their lives in Benghazi, perhaps they should honor their work and what they stood for, rather than trying to score political points by making it seem as if they lost their lives needlessly—to those of us paying attention, it’s pathetically desperate.

http://chuckingrocks.com/?p=305

your logic is laughable. 9/11 and the Bengazi debacle is alike comparing apples to oranges. This article looks like it was written by a 3rd grade libtard with all the hallmarks of circular logic and fallacy, usually based on emotions and not logic.

Obama knew. Kick this piece of shit out of office

http://www.worldtribune.com/2012/10/26/b.../#comments

You seem uptight, and uneducated.

Post: #10

bbkingdom  Wrote:

Nobody knows what happened, all rumours. Like with his BC and destroying What happened is what happens in all wars, what is happening for 12 years, and that is people dying. Probably you and the media and conservatives now making this an issue means that wrong people need to go, wrong decision will be made, just to please the media and or politicians.

What happened was not a big atrocity. All this is just games.

RUMORS? lol. Uhhh Obama, that you? Rumors my ass. Even Petreus and other high ranking officials are coming out and spilling the beans. You libtards are a real riot. Facts mean nothing to you. This is not a Republican and Democrat thing. This is a f*cked up thing. This POS needs to go.

Watch this video, it says it all
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...g-e71IDAUw

Post: #11

I'm expecting a rash of "accidents" of people in the know in the upcoming week.

Post: #12

AC488  Wrote:

Myth #3: Obama lied about Benghazi

The other problem with the Republican effort to manufacture outrage about Benghazi is that it’s blatantly immoral and hypocritical. If you don’t think so, ask yourself this question: should Democrats have immediately attacked President Bush for 9/11? Should they have said that he wanted those people to die (as those on the right have said about Obama) within a couple months of the attacks? Look, I’ll admit, after the dust settled and we began to look at what happened more closely, there were many on the Left, including myself, that said Bush was incompetent, and that if he’d been more concerned about the terrorist threat, 9/11 may not have happened. But nearly all Americans had enough sense, decency, and respect for those who lost their lives not to piss on their graves—especially not right after it happened. So if Republicans are really so concerned about those who lost their lives in Benghazi, perhaps they should honor their work and what they stood for, rather than trying to score political points by making it seem as if they lost their lives needlessly—to those of us paying attention, it’s pathetically desperate.

http://chuckingrocks.com/?p=305

We're not talking about President Bush, because he's no longer President. This issue is about Obama, K? try to stay on topic..

Post: #13

Reichwingers can you stop dancing on graves of killed Americans, please? You are repulsive.

Even some Fox hosts and commentators are getting sick and tired of this insane, hyper-partisan witch hunt.

Geraldo stands up to Fox and Friends on Benghazi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EX-wEEEaQ-I

Condi's Reasoned Statement on Libya
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k_LMTNLZXc

Post: #14

LoP Guest  Wrote:

AC488  Wrote:

Myth #3: Obama lied about Benghazi

The other problem with the Republican effort to manufacture outrage about Benghazi is that it’s blatantly immoral and hypocritical. If you don’t think so, ask yourself this question: should Democrats have immediately attacked President Bush for 9/11? Should they have said that he wanted those people to die (as those on the right have said about Obama) within a couple months of the attacks? Look, I’ll admit, after the dust settled and we began to look at what happened more closely, there were many on the Left, including myself, that said Bush was incompetent, and that if he’d been more concerned about the terrorist threat, 9/11 may not have happened. But nearly all Americans had enough sense, decency, and respect for those who lost their lives not to piss on their graves—especially not right after it happened. So if Republicans are really so concerned about those who lost their lives in Benghazi, perhaps they should honor their work and what they stood for, rather than trying to score political points by making it seem as if they lost their lives needlessly—to those of us paying attention, it’s pathetically desperate.

http://chuckingrocks.com/?p=305

We're not talking about President Bush, because he's no longer President. This issue is about Obama, K? try to stay on topic..

WHY is this not a topic??? Over 2/3 of Romney staffers are former Bush staffers; the belong to the same Neocon / Pro Zionist wing of GOP.

Neocons has a long history of cashing in acts of terror: from (at least) letting the 9/11 attacks happen on purpose to push the PATRIOT act, forging intel on WMD to launch the war against Iraq, to portraying Democrats as terrorist sympathizers to score political victories in 2002 and 2004. Romney’s first reaction upon learning of violence in Libya was to accuse Obama without knowing what’s actually going on.

Where was your outrage after 9 U.S. embassy were attacked on Bush's watch? Where was your outrage after 9/11 attack?

Post: #15

We are at war against terrorism.

In war people die.

Why are the Republicans so angry about diplomats and mercenaries in Libya, but they never say a word about all of the soldiers who have died or injured in Iraq or Afghanistan after George W. Bush started wars there?

Cant you people see the hypocrisy?