News

**indigowiz**

Good News from international action to ban CFC's!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8aR9SI1Uh8

**diggerbanks**

indigowiz Wrote:

Good News from international action to ban CFC's!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8aR9SI1Uh8

Very good news indeed. Perhaps the outright denialists for other atmospheric situations can see now that things we put into the atmosphere, affects the atmosphere.

**Pokoia** · **Pokoia** Subscriber User ID: 16873 10-27-2012 12:01 PM **Posts: 3,070**

indigowiz Wrote:

Good News from international action to ban CFC's!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8aR9SI1Uh8

I am not impressed.
It could very well be the case that the extra energetic particles and radiation, partly at least coming from the Sun, are responsible for the extra ozone.
Besides I still don't believe that CFK's did it in the first place.
The molecule is to heavy to go up high enough in our atmosphere and do harm in the ozone layer.
EVERY research I EVER found just measured the percentage of chloride.
Look for other sources of chloride like nature and pvc burning in landfills.
It all was a hoax/conspiracy very handy for the industry.
The old patents were gone, now they can use the new one's and earn a stiff buck.

Jhikpghf

**Pokoia** · **Pokoia** Subscriber User ID: 16873 10-27-2012 12:14 PM **Posts: 3,070**

Because I like to see your opinion on this matter.
Bump

**Pokoia** · **Pokoia** Subscriber User ID: 16873 10-27-2012 02:22 PM **Posts: 3,070**

Come on, you must have thoughts about this.
Natural, man made.
Conspiracy????

Bump

**Pokoia** · **Pokoia** Subscriber User ID: 16873 10-27-2012 03:19 PM **Posts: 3,070**

I give up.
I expected to much brains here.
You probably just want to be fooled.
Life is easier that way.
Go on discussing your great two-party choice.
And other no brainers.
S977

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 129872 10-27-2012 03:55 PM

diggerbanks Wrote:

indigowiz Wrote:
Good News from international action to ban CFC's!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8aR9SI1Uh8

Very good news indeed. Perhaps the outright denialists for other atmospheric situations can see now that things we put into the atmosphere, affects the atmosphere.

You didn't see the video, did you?

It said it 'could be' i.e. may not be... might be.... possibly be etc.

Is this what they call 'science'? Is this 'might be' worth publishing?

When the 'scientists' who use 'tricks' to massage their data and prevent opponents from having their findings published (remember the leaked emails where they said they do this?) can accurately predict the weather a few days in advance, then they might be worth listening to.

Until then.... it 'might'.. 'could'... 'maybe' happening... or it just might not be happening at all. The longer we wait, the more we see that they have been wrong all along.

Now they tell us the next 30 years are going to get colder even though we are pumping carbon into the air like never before in history.

S977

**diggerbanks**

LoP Guest Wrote:

diggerbanks Wrote:
indigowiz Wrote:
Good News from international action to ban CFC's!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8aR9SI1Uh8

Very good news indeed. Perhaps the outright denialists for other atmospheric situations can see now that things we put into the atmosphere, affects the atmosphere.

You didn't see the video, did you?

It said it 'could be' i.e. may not be... might be.... possibly be etc.

Is this what they call 'science'? Is this 'might be' worth publishing?

When the 'scientists' who use 'tricks' to massage their data and prevent opponents from having their findings published (remember the leaked emails where they said they do this?) can accurately predict the weather a few days in advance, then they might be worth listening to.

Until then.... it 'might'.. 'could'... 'maybe' happening... or it just might not be happening at all. The longer we wait, the more we see that they have been wrong all along.

Now they tell us the next 30 years are going to get colder even though we are pumping carbon into the air like never before in history.

Nope, did not watch. Of course they can't say it is definitely the reason, that would be bad science. I'm not a scientist so I can say what the f*ck I want. And you can choose to agree with me or not or hide your point of view in semantics.

**FreeFlow**

Pokoia Wrote:

I give up.
I expected to much brains here.
You probably just want to be fooled.
Life is easier that way.
Go on discussing your great two-party choice.
And other no brainers.

Relax man lol, it's Sunday, we don't always have thoughts on everything Heartflowers

**BANISHED** lop guest User ID: 129576 10-28-2012 06:12 PM

I haven't bought the CFC effect on ozone for this reason - The vast majority of CFC's were produced in the northern hemisphere, yet the ozone hole isn't over the arctic, it's over the antarctic.

The logical question to me is what is the effect of the magnetic north and south pole on the flow of ions into either the north or south pole and their impact on ozone? If the real source of the ozone hole is from space, then space weather creates the ozone hole, not CFC's.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 37860 10-28-2012 06:39 PM

Ozone is a none issue, always have been a none issue. And now we have the CO2 crap and that's a none issue as well. All bullshit alarmist scams.

**bbkingdom**

Does this mean we cannot go to the moon anymore?
Lmao

**thor** lop guest User ID: 130130 10-28-2012 07:10 PM

how will the sun light come threw if closed?

not a good sign bad

very bad

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 102295 10-28-2012 07:23 PM

i'm not buying it