News

**Black H@t** · (This post was last modified: 04-26-2012 09:47 PM by Black H@t.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho-0SHFEg...r_embedded

The world’s most renowned population analyst has called for a massive reduction in the number of humans and for natural resources to be redistributed from the rich to the poor.

Paul Ehrlich, Bing professor of population studies at Stanford University in California and author of the best-selling Population Bomb book in 1968, goes much further than the Royal Society in London which this morning said that physical numbers were as important as the amount of natural resources consumed.

The optimum population of Earth – enough to guarantee the minimal physical ingredients of a decent life to everyone – was 1.5 to 2 billion people rather than the 7 billion who are alive today or the 9 billion expected in 2050, said Ehrlich in an interview with the Guardian.

“How many you support depends on lifestyles. We came up with 1.5 to 2 billion because you can have big active cities and wilderness. If you want a battery chicken world where everyone has minimum space and food and everyone is kept just about alive you might be able to support in the long term about 4 or 5 billion people. But you already have 7 billion. So we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible move to population shrinkage.”

“The question is: can you go over the top without a disaster, like a worldwide plague or a nuclear war between India and Pakistan? If we go on at the pace we are there’s going to be various forms of disaster. Some maybe slow motion disasters like people getting more and more hungry, or catastrophic disasters because the more people you have the greater the chance of some weird virus transferring from animal to human populations, there could be a vast die-off.”

Ehrlich, who was described as alarmist in the 1970s but who says most of his predictions have proved correct, says he was gloomy about humanity’s ability to feed over 9 billion people. “We have 1 billion people hungry now and we are going to add 2.5 billion. They are going to have to be fed on more marginal land, from water that is purified more or transported further, we’re going to have disproportionate impacts on how we feed people from the population increase itself,” he said.

Source: f*ck You Obummer! doomed

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/26/ex...Raw+Story)

**RedShift**

Black H@t Wrote:

Source: f*ck You Obummer!

that has absolutely nothing to do with the article you posted..

[snip] from the article....
But he agreed with the Royal Society report that said human population and consumption should not be divided. “[They] multiply together. You have to be deal with them together. We have too much consumption among the rich and too little among the poor. That implies that terrible thing that we are going to have to do which is to somehow redistribute access to resources away the rich to the poor. But in the US we have been doing the opposite. The Republican party is wildly in favour of more redistribution, of taking money from the poor and giving it to the rich.”

Pi Infinity User ID: 3.14159265 04-26-2012 09:58 PM

Welp. He's right but he's not citing why he's right. He's not pointing out that the status quo is maintained and that ingenuity is suppressed to keep it so.

There's solutions. But they don't make anyone money. So, everyone must die. That's reality.

**The Comedian**

RedShift Wrote:

Black H@t Wrote:
Source: f*ck You Obummer!

that has absolutely nothing to do with the article you posted..

[snip] from the article....
But he agreed with the Royal Society report that said human population and consumption should not be divided. “[They] multiply together. You have to be deal with them together. We have too much consumption among the rich and too little among the poor. That implies that terrible thing that we are going to have to do which is to somehow redistribute access to resources away the rich to the poor. But in the US we have been doing the opposite. The Republican party is wildly in favour of more redistribution, of taking money from the poor and giving it to the rich.”

Which is, of course, a completely transparent lie.

That Emmanuel is Rahm's brother, btw.

A pair of walking arguments in favor of abortion if there ever were any.

Pi Infinity User ID: 3.14159265 04-26-2012 10:04 PM

DIE DIE DIE! Give me all your assets for national security reasons of course! End

**Sentient 6**

its about time.the breeders of this world have f*cked us all.all they had to do is not have kids,how hard is that.but..but.. Srjceahd

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 92892 04-27-2012 12:19 AM

**Disturbed nli** Not the real one! User ID: 1 04-27-2012 12:22 AM

Pi Wrote:

There's solutions. But they don't make anyone money. So, everyone must die. That's reality.

**mext** lop guest User ID: 55367 04-27-2012 12:25 AM

Sentient 6 Wrote:

its about time.the breeders of this world have f*cked us all.all they had to do is not have kids,how hard is that.but..but..

are you a clone or something ?
.