Noetic  Wrote:

ZeroToad  Wrote:

[quote='tethys' pid='3308863' dateline='1336118844']
ZeroToad


What's interesting about science is they get the data, apply it to their theories, then publish the result as fact, when the data is correct but the theories are flawed, sew what they publish is bullshit.

I've even read they think the Milky Way Galaxy is the end result of two galaxies colliding but the twin alignment bubbles prove that wrong. If we had collided with another galaxy, our bubbles would kNot be sew well defined and symmetrical and Centaurus A is no different, it too is a single galaxy (baby galaxy) that never collided with another galaxy but because there are things about it that their theories cannot explain, the only possible answer they can come up with is its the result of a galactic collision but her birthing plumes are still symmetrical as well, sew it too isn't what they think it is.



Once science wakes up and realizes the truth about the Universe, they will finally realize that galactic collisions are more rare than originally thought and the reason why is MAGNETICS. Which magnetics is why the Milky Way and Andromeda will NEVER collide.

Ribbit

Ps: With the Centaurus A tri-composite photo, y0u should see a white streak going upwards from the center but kNot downwards. That is coming out of one of the dual back-to-back black holes at the center and helps to prove there are twin black holes at the center of galaxies, since why else is it only coming out that one side and kNot both sides or even in multiple areas, that is, if black holes are actually what they say they are, instead of rips in Space, there should be matter streaming outwards in ALL angles. Plus, what many peeps aren't aware of is science now knows matter is ejected out of black holes but if y0u apply that to what science says are black holes, it doesn't jive.

I agree collisions are indeed a novel occurrence and black holes don't jive, but what do you think of this?

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/44cosmic_wi..._Here.html

Electromagnetism can better explain these so called collisions. Perhaps they aren't collisions at all? But rather more stable magnetic attractions, +/- polar configurations on a galactic scale. Just as we get rings at Saturn's neutral equator, we get rings of stars at the galactic equator and positive and negative poles. This is perhaps a better explanation for galactic center "blackholes".

As to where the planets originated, I really don't know, but I dew know they are an illusion, just as everything else is, but I believe the illusion is based on fact.

As to galactic collisions, take a peek at these supposed colliding galaxies:

http://www.cosmiclight.com/imagegallerie...isions.htm

By what I can tell, oNe of those is colliding and the rest aren't.

Sumthing I want y0u to think about is what's known as Passive Momentum. y0u'Re on a train moving 100 feet per second. y0u have a gun that projects a bullet at 200 feet per second. Given there is zEr0 entropy, when shooting at a stationary target next to the train tracks, y0u fire at it while moving towards it and at a distance of 600 feet away from the target. 2 seconds later the bullet will hit the target and at that time, y0u will be 400 feet from the target:

train speed = 100 f/s = X
bullet speed = 200 f/s = Y

2X + 2Y = 600

200 + 400 = 600

Actual "ground" bullet speed:

600/2 = 300 f/s

Then when shooting at the same stationary target but ThiS time as y0u are moving away from the target, y0u fire at it from a distance of 200 feet away from the target. 2 seconds later the bullet will hit the target and at that time, y0u will be again be 400 feet from the target:

train speed = -100 f/s = X
bullet speed = 200 f/s = Y

2X + 2Y = 200

-200 + 400 = 200

Actual "ground" bullet speed:

200/2 = 100 f/s

Now apply Passive Momentum to Photons. If a photon has mass, which they dew, when that photon leaves SourCe, SourCe Momentum will attach to the photon, changing it's final speed, just like the bullet above. Sew let's apply Passive Momentum to Galaxies and Light.

2 Galaxies are on a semi-parallel "crossing" course to one another, like a "+" sign, with G1 at the north point and G2 is at the south point and both will pass close to center but off by a little and the Milky Way Galaxy, the Observing Galaxy, is 10 billion light years away from dead center of the "+" and in the direction of south, but off-center enough to be able to see both galaxies at the same time, except when they cross each other's path, and the two galaxies are 1 billion light years away from dead center. Here are the givens from that:

Earth to G1 = 11 billion light years apart
Earth to G2 = 9 billion light years apart
G1 to G2 = 2 billion light years apart

G1 is moving at .2 light speed towards the Milky Way and G2 is moving at .1 light speed away from the Milky Way. It will take G1 5 billion years to reach the center point area and it will take G2 10 billion years to reach the center point area but what will we see on our end?




When G1 is in the center area, G2 will be .5 billion light years away and 10 billion years later the light we will see here on earth will be:

G1 light speed = 1.2c = 8.3 billion years for light to reach earth
G2 light speed = .9c = 11.1 billion years for light to reach earth

Sew there is a 3 billion year illusion going down with what we see on earth and G2 can occupy the same space as G1, or vice versa, and it will look like they are colliding but they aren't. It's known as a Galactic Mirage.

Sumthing I've been trying to get Stinky to see is all of the distractions that are in place. Science doesn't think photons have mass and without mass, Passive Momentum cannot go down, sew the photons will kNot absorb SourCe Speed and Light Speed is a Constant, but that's kNot the case and since Science is backwards, they are kNot accounting for Galactic Mirages and they think galaxies are colliding when they aren't.

Science has assigned the Space-Time of Numbers to in-between the numbers, when by dew'n that, it hides Finite and without Finite, y0u can't define the Universe properly, sew y0u define it wrong but with the Space-Time of Numbers assigned correctly, to the Numbers themselves, Finite sticks out like a sore thumb and defining the Universe is easy.

Science has theorized the Universe is a Closed System and the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies to it but it isn't a Closed System, it's an Open System, sew the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies in Reverse.

Perpetual Motion of the 3rd Kind doesn't exist in Closed System, then it does exist in an Open System.

Everything's going to entropy in a Closed System, then there is zEr0 entropy in a Open System.

Etc . . .

What I've been trying to get Stinky to see is the Perfection in ThiS cluster-f*ck We call Life! Then to realize it can't get ThiS screwed up on its own.

It's too Perfect! That says sumthing is afowl.

Ribbit

Is ZT serious? Or is he something like Sorch Faal. Or maybe Ted Kaczynski?

ZeroToad  Wrote:

Noetic  Wrote:

I agree collisions are indeed a novel occurrence and black holes don't jive, but what do you think of this?

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/44cosmic_wi..._Here.html

Electromagnetism can better explain these so called collisions. Perhaps they aren't collisions at all? But rather more stable magnetic attractions, +/- polar configurations on a galactic scale. Just as we get rings at Saturn's neutral equator, we get rings of stars at the galactic equator and positive and negative poles. This is perhaps a better explanation for galactic center "blackholes".

As to where the planets originated, I really don't know, but I dew know they are an illusion, just as everything else is, but I believe the illusion is based on fact.

As to galactic collisions, take a peek at these supposed colliding galaxies:

http://www.cosmiclight.com/imagegallerie...isions.htm

By what I can tell, oNe of those is colliding and the rest aren't.

Sumthing I want y0u to think about is what's known as Passive Momentum. y0u'Re on a train moving 100 feet per second. y0u have a gun that projects a bullet at 200 feet per second. Given there is zEr0 entropy, when shooting at a stationary target next to the train tracks, y0u fire at it while moving towards it and at a distance of 600 feet away from the target. 2 seconds later the bullet will hit the target and at that time, y0u will be 400 feet from the target:

train speed = 100 f/s = X
bullet speed = 200 f/s = Y

2X + 2Y = 600

200 + 400 = 600

Actual "ground" bullet speed:

600/2 = 300 f/s

Then when shooting at the same stationary target but ThiS time as y0u are moving away from the target, y0u fire at it from a distance of 200 feet away from the target. 2 seconds later the bullet will hit the target and at that time, y0u will be again be 400 feet from the target:

train speed = -100 f/s = X
bullet speed = 200 f/s = Y

2X + 2Y = 200

-200 + 400 = 200

Actual "ground" bullet speed:

200/2 = 100 f/s

Now apply Passive Momentum to Photons. If a photon has mass, which they dew, when that photon leaves SourCe, SourCe Momentum will attach to the photon, changing it's final speed, just like the bullet above. Sew let's apply Passive Momentum to Galaxies and Light.

2 Galaxies are on a semi-parallel "crossing" course to one another, like a "+" sign, with G1 at the north point and G2 is at the south point and both will pass close to center but off by a little and the Milky Way Galaxy, the Observing Galaxy, is 10 billion light years away from dead center of the "+" and in the direction of south, but off-center enough to be able to see both galaxies at the same time, except when they cross each other's path, and the two galaxies are 1 billion light years away from dead center. Here are the givens from that:

Earth to G1 = 11 billion light years apart
Earth to G2 = 9 billion light years apart
G1 to G2 = 2 billion light years apart

G1 is moving at .2 light speed towards the Milky Way and G2 is moving at .1 light speed away from the Milky Way. It will take G1 5 billion years to reach the center point area and it will take G2 10 billion years to reach the center point area but what will we see on our end?




When G1 is in the center area, G2 will be .5 billion light years away and 10 billion years later the light we will see here on earth will be:

G1 light speed = 1.2c = 8.3 billion years for light to reach earth
G2 light speed = .9c = 11.1 billion years for light to reach earth

Sew there is a 3 billion year illusion going down with what we see on earth and G2 can occupy the same space as G1, or vice versa, and it will look like they are colliding but they aren't. It's known as a Galactic Mirage.

Sumthing I've been trying to get Stinky to see is all of the distractions that are in place. Science doesn't think photons have mass and without mass, Passive Momentum cannot go down, sew the photons will kNot absorb SourCe Speed and Light Speed is a Constant, but that's kNot the case and since Science is backwards, they are kNot accounting for Galactic Mirages and they think galaxies are colliding when they aren't.

Science has assigned the Space-Time of Numbers to in-between the numbers, when by dew'n that, it hides Finite and without Finite, y0u can't define the Universe properly, sew y0u define it wrong but with the Space-Time of Numbers assigned correctly, to the Numbers themselves, Finite sticks out like a sore thumb and defining the Universe is easy.

Science has theorized the Universe is a Closed System and the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies to it but it isn't a Closed System, it's an Open System, sew the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies in Reverse.

Perpetual Motion of the 3rd Kind doesn't exist in Closed System, then it does exist in an Open System.

Everything's going to entropy in a Closed System, then there is zEr0 entropy in a Open System.

Etc . . .

What I've been trying to get Stinky to see is the Perfection in ThiS cluster-f*ck We call Life! Then to realize it can't get ThiS screwed up on its own.

It's too Perfect! That says sumthing is afowl.

Ribbit

I want to note that my comments concerning colliding galaxies and Passive Momentum can be proven by measuring the Redshift of each of the galaxies in the pic of supposed colliding galaxies. Redshift has recently been proven to kNot be what they thought it was, they now know it's the age of the Light sew when they measure the Redshift of those two galaxies, they'll find they aren't the same and from there, they can date the time of the light and reconstruct the actual events, which will show the galactic collision is a mirage but collisions dew occur, just kNot as often as they think.

And at the same time, they will prove that Photons dew have mass. It's Space & Time that don't have mass and they flow THRU everything that does have mass.

Ribbit

ZeroToad  Wrote:

I want to note that my comments concerning colliding galaxies and Passive Momentum can be proven by measuring the Redshift of each of the galaxies in the pic of supposed colliding galaxies. Redshift has recently been proven to kNot be what they thought it was, they now know it's the age of the Light sew when they measure the Redshift of those two galaxies, they'll find they aren't the same and from there, they can date the time of the light and reconstruct the actual events, which will show the galactic collision is a mirage but collisions dew occur, just kNot as often as they think.

And at the same time, they will prove that Photons dew have mass. It's Space & Time that don't have mass and they flow THRU everything that does have mass.

Ribbit

I'm not sure what you mean.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Nice post op, but we would have to throw out the majority of what we know for any of it to be feasible. Romantic though.

It is a long thread but if you have time to read it including the links then the evidence presented is compelling.

Earth and Titan are the most similar bodies in the solar system and this would indicate a similar origin.

The atmospheric composition in the stratosphere is 98.4% nitrogen—the only dense, nitrogen-rich atmosphere in the Solar System aside from the Earth's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Titan

"Earth's Twin" May Be in Our Solar System: Saturn's Moon, Titan --Hosts a Layered Atmosphere.
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/201...earth.html

The sun is a variable star and in recent documented history has released some large solar flares -
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=13844
Taking a different route, researchers from the University of Otago used radio wave-based measurements of the x-rays' effects on the Earth's upper atmosphere to revise the flare's size from a merely huge X28 to a "whopping" X45.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859
From August 28, 1859, until September 2, numerous sunspots and solar flares were observed on the sun. Just before noon on September 1, the British astronomer Richard Carrington observed the largest flare,[3] which caused a massive coronal mass ejection (CME) to travel directly toward Earth, taking 17 hours. This is remarkable because such a journey normally takes three to four days. This second CME moved so quickly because the first one had cleared the way of the ambient solar wind plasma.

For life to flourish a peaceful period of evolution is required and the sun certainly does not provide this.

On the balance of probabilities the OP is the more likely.