Full Circle  Wrote:

What are the biblical laws?

It's not about telling people to stop eating sausages,that's for sure!

The SOLE purpose of the Old-Testament law,was to testify of JESUS CHRIST!!!!!!!

Or,in other words,God gave his people the Law to show them/underline the fact,that they needed JESUS CHRIST'S salvation—that NOTHING else could save their souls,ESPECIALLY NOT the Law!

Sounds paradoxical,but it's true!!!

INTERESTING BIT:Jesus Christ HIMSELF told the religious "elites" in the New-Testament to "search the scriptures,they testify(SPEAK)of me"!!!!!!! Meaning,the ENTIRE Old-Testament was all about Jesus Christ!!!!!!!

WOW,WOW,WOW,WOW,WOW,WOW,WOW!!!!!!!

THE LAW SAVES NO ONE! IT WAS NEVER GIVEN TO SAVE ANYONE!! IT WAS GiVEN TO TEACH YOU/ME(!) OF YOUR/MY NEED FOR JESUS CHRIST—IT'S ALL ABOUT HIM!!!!!!!

FRIENDS,CONFESS YOUR SINS TO THE GOD OF THE BIBLE,ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR NEED FOR JESUS CHRIST'S SALVATION AND ASK JESUS TO BE YOUR LORD AND YOUR SAVIOUR.YOU WILL THEN BELONG TO GOD AND NOBODY CAN THEN TAKE YOU AWAY FROM GOD!!!!!!!

I wish you the best.Be blessed good friend!!!

No need for the law, without the law there is no sin, not that we are sinners to begin with!!

You're are not guilty of anything, unless others can make you believe it!!

If the laws was really that important, why did your god reduce it from the original 613 to only 10?

The reasons for all the BS laws is to make everyone guilty, if not so, when your supposed christ arrived and declared, "I'm here to die for your sins...lol, the masses simply would have said, "What f*cking sins, knock yourself out?"

Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound....(Rom:5 : 20)

And to add insult to injury with these BS laws, we already know by nature what is right!!

.

And to add insult to injury with these BS laws, we already know by nature what is right!!

Ahriman  Wrote:

You quote Paul, an ex-pharisee with baggage imho. Giving Paul the benefit of the doubt, he was writing well meaning letters - not scripture. His insistance on the Law is his one major failing. If your faith be what it says it is.

He contradicts the words of Jesus. He contradicts himself.

It's not Paulianity it's Christianity.

Just my 2cent.

When I discovered that for myself and started to ask questions about it to the "leadership"....and received nothing back but either blank stares of disapproval or "you just don't understand the context" ...I knew I could never go back to the mainstream.

The Lucky AC  Wrote:

Ahriman  Wrote:

You quote Paul, an ex-pharisee with baggage imho. Giving Paul the benefit of the doubt, he was writing well meaning letters - not scripture. His insistance on the Law is his one major failing. If your faith be what it says it is.

He contradicts the words of Jesus. He contradicts himself.

It's not Paulianity it's Christianity.

Just my 2cent.

When I discovered that for myself and started to ask questions about it to the "leadership"....and received nothing back but either blank stares of disapproval or "you just don't understand the context" ...I knew I could never go back to the mainstream.

I understand it is not Paulinity. But we quote him because he is SO good at pointing us PAST him and to Jesus. Never once does he take credit for himself, instead he takes all his accomplishments and makes them nothing in comparison with Jesus, and knowing him. Paul points to Jesus. And we point at what he says because what he is saying is pointing to Jesus.

LOPastor  Wrote:

The Lucky AC  Wrote:

When I discovered that for myself and started to ask questions about it to the "leadership"....and received nothing back but either blank stares of disapproval or "you just don't understand the context" ...I knew I could never go back to the mainstream.

I understand it is not Paulinity. But we quote him because he is SO good at pointing us PAST him and to Jesus. Never once does he take credit for himself, instead he takes all his accomplishments and makes them nothing in comparison with Jesus, and knowing him. Paul points to Jesus. And we point at what he says because what he is saying is pointing to Jesus.

"I was circumcised when I was eight days old. I am a pure-blooded citizen of Israel and a member of the tribe of Benjamin—a real Hebrew if there ever was one! I was a member of the Pharisees, who demand the strictest obedience to the Jewish law. I was so zealous that I harshly persecuted the church. And as for righteousness, I obeyed the law without fault. I once thought these things were valuable, but now I consider them worthless because of what Christ has done. Yes, everything else is worthless when compared with the infinite value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have discarded everything else, counting it all as garbage, so that I could gain Christ" Philippians 3:5-8

Maybe what you need to look at is what Jesus is saying....and that is pointing PAST him to the Father.

Ahriman  Wrote:

You quote Paul, an ex-pharisee with baggage imho. Giving Paul the benefit of the doubt, he was writing well meaning letters - not scripture. His insistance on the Law is his one major failing. If your faith be what it says it is.

He contradicts the words of Jesus. He contradicts himself.

It's not Paulianity it's Christianity.

Just my 2cent.

When I discovered that for myself and started to ask questions about it to the "leadership"....and received nothing back but either blank stares of disapproval or "you just don't understand the context" ...I knew I could never go back to the mainstream.

The Lucky AC  Wrote:

Ahriman  Wrote:

You quote Paul, an ex-pharisee with baggage imho. Giving Paul the benefit of the doubt, he was writing well meaning letters - not scripture. His insistance on the Law is his one major failing. If your faith be what it says it is.

He contradicts the words of Jesus. He contradicts himself.

It's not Paulianity it's Christianity.

Just my 2cent.

When I discovered that for myself and started to ask questions about it to the "leadership"....and received nothing back but either blank stares of disapproval or "you just don't understand the context" ...I knew I could never go back to the mainstream.

I understand it is not Paulinity. But we quote him because he is SO good at pointing us PAST him and to Jesus. Never once does he take credit for himself, instead he takes all his accomplishments and makes them nothing in comparison with Jesus, and knowing him. Paul points to Jesus. And we point at what he says because what he is saying is pointing to Jesus.

"I was circumcised when I was eight days old. I am a pure-blooded citizen of Israel and a member of the tribe of Benjamin—a real Hebrew if there ever was one! I was a member of the Pharisees, who demand the strictest obedience to the Jewish law. I was so zealous that I harshly persecuted the church. And as for righteousness, I obeyed the law without fault. I once thought these things were valuable, but now I consider them worthless because of what Christ has done. Yes, everything else is worthless when compared with the infinite value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have discarded everything else, counting it all as garbage, so that I could gain Christ" Philippians 3:5-8

The Lucky AC  Wrote:

Ahriman  Wrote:

You quote Paul, an ex-pharisee with baggage imho. Giving Paul the benefit of the doubt, he was writing well meaning letters - not scripture. His insistance on the Law is his one major failing. If your faith be what it says it is.

He contradicts the words of Jesus. He contradicts himself.

It's not Paulianity it's Christianity.

Just my 2cent.

When I discovered that for myself and started to ask questions about it to the "leadership"....and received nothing back but either blank stares of disapproval or "you just don't understand the context" ...I knew I could never go back to the mainstream.

God gave man the Bible so man could never be deceived by people
blaspheming his word, and pretending that their "2cent" is worth
something.

Whenever one looks to people instead of the Word of God (Matthew 4:4,
(2 Peter 1:20), one can be deceived.

The King James Bible in its entirety (John 1:1, Genesis 1:1), virtually
identical to the Dead Sea Scrolls, is the Word of God (Deuteronomy 4:2,
Proverbs 30:5-6, 2 Peter 1:21).

Whatever is in the King James Bible is by the will of almighty God,
not man (2 Peter 1:21).

If God could not preserve his Word for man for any reason whatsoever,
then he is not God; there is no God.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

The Lucky AC  Wrote:

When I discovered that for myself and started to ask questions about it to the "leadership"....and received nothing back but either blank stares of disapproval or "you just don't understand the context" ...I knew I could never go back to the mainstream.

God gave man the Bible so man could never be deceived by people
blaspheming his word, and pretending that their "2cent" is worth
something.

Whenever one looks to people instead of the Word of God (Matthew 4:4,
(2 Peter 1:20), one can be deceived.

The King James Bible in its entirety (John 1:1, Genesis 1:1), virtually
identical to the Dead Sea Scrolls, is the Word of God (Deuteronomy 4:2,
Proverbs 30:5-6, 2 Peter 1:21).

Whatever is in the King James Bible is by the will of almighty God,
not man (2 Peter 1:21).

If God could not preserve his Word for man for any reason whatsoever,
then he is not God; there is no God.

You only know what you have read in books so maybe the books you have read are just biased so that people will believe "there is no God" as you said.

And if there is no God why would you use a capital G?

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

God gave man the Bible so man could never be deceived by people
blaspheming his word, and pretending that their "2cent" is worth
something.

Whenever one looks to people instead of the Word of God (Matthew 4:4,
(2 Peter 1:20), one can be deceived.

The King James Bible in its entirety (John 1:1, Genesis 1:1), virtually
identical to the Dead Sea Scrolls, is the Word of God (Deuteronomy 4:2,
Proverbs 30:5-6, 2 Peter 1:21).

Whatever is in the King James Bible is by the will of almighty God,
not man (2 Peter 1:21).

If God could not preserve his Word for man for any reason whatsoever,
then he is not God; there is no God.

You only know what you have read in books so maybe the books you have read are just biased so that people will believe "there is no God" as you said.

And if there is no God why would you use a capital G?

^^^
didn't you preach satanic witch marianne williamson's doctrine as being of
God the other day?

Ye shall know them by their fruits.
(Matthew 7:16)

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

God gave man the Bible so man could never be deceived by people
blaspheming his word, and pretending that their "2cent" is worth
something.

Whenever one looks to people instead of the Word of God (Matthew 4:4,
(2 Peter 1:20), one can be deceived.

The King James Bible in its entirety (John 1:1, Genesis 1:1), virtually
identical to the Dead Sea Scrolls, is the Word of God (Deuteronomy 4:2,
Proverbs 30:5-6, 2 Peter 1:21).

Whatever is in the King James Bible is by the will of almighty God,
not man (2 Peter 1:21).

If God could not preserve his Word for man for any reason whatsoever,
then he is not God; there is no God.

You only know what you have read in books so maybe the books you have read are just biased so that people will believe "there is no God" as you said.

And if there is no God why would you use a capital G?

^^^
didn't you preach satanic witch marianne williamson's doctrine as being of
God the other day?

Ye shall know them by their fruits.
(Matthew 7:16)

The 'Laws' were written by inorganic Archon intelligence - to create/mould a social identity/self amongst the Jews that fostered the downloading of the (inhuman) Archon awareness into it's human hosts.

The Aeon Christos (the Sun) is there to mediate this process and marry it up with the Gaian awarness natural to our souls.

The completion of this process - deranged intelligence percieving itself to be God - downloaded into the human psyche and harnessed to an awarness of soul = model rational minded citizen of a Western Liberal democracy (for example)

That has been the whole purpose of organic life on this planet - to recombine the scrambled aspects of Sophia as she fragmented and separated during her fall - the archonic aspects that resist redemption are the fallen angels - this is what the NWO elites have been influenced by throughout the ages.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ  Wrote:

You only know what you have read in books so maybe the books you have read are just biased so that people will believe "there is no God" as you said.

And if there is no God why would you use a capital G?

^^^
didn't you preach satanic witch marianne williamson's doctrine as being of
God the other day?

Ye shall know them by their fruits.
(Matthew 7:16)

Who is marianne williamson?

Our deepest fear..........

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that frightens us most. We ask ourselves "Who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, and famous?" Actually who are you not to be? You are a child of God. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that people won't feel insecure around you. We were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us. It's not just in some of us it's in all of us. And when we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others."
-Maryanne Williamson