|
Thread Rating:
- 1 Votes - 1 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
|
Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
|
daisy lop guest User ID: 48475 08-08-2012 05:17 AM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
Tune 440 Wrote:They might try taking the guns, but the only ones they would get are from law abiding citizens.
You can see how that might end...
exactly...
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 111697 08-08-2012 05:17 AM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
They can try.
But... realistically speaking, they can't kill all of us.
|
|
|
|
IAmDone Registered User User ID: 112133 08-08-2012 05:23 AM
Posts: 81
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
I'm pretty sure they want to target semi automatic guns, which include most hand held guns such as .45s.
I beleive weapons such as shotguns will be safe due to the fact that they only hold so many shells and then have to be manually reloaded .
This is my understanding according to the UN treaty that has yet to be signed.
I'd like to see that shit happen here in the South!!
I Am Done#
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 14017 08-08-2012 05:26 AM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
You are correct, but whether it concerns rifles, reptoids, or rapture, being realistic has nothing to do with all the fear-for-profit that's sold to the dumb gullible redneck suckers on the looney fringe.
|
|
|
|
flintstone lop guest User ID: 95037 08-08-2012 05:28 AM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
they will not take shit. they cannot take anything. this country is on the verge of a second revolution and they are stepping very lightly around this gun issue. the problem is simply you can ban all the guns you want and u still have idiots. so some mental moron will go apeshit with a machete. THE GUNS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM
he excactly what it would necessitate to 'take all the guns'
there are 250 - 280 million firearms in the US
40 - 50% of US homes own a firearm, that's 120 - 150 million people
As of 30 September 2010, 1,430,895 people were on active duty in the military, with an additional 848,000 people in the seven reserve components
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Armed_Forces
do the math.
|
|
|
|
EndTheFed Registered User User ID: 113393 08-08-2012 08:58 AM
Posts: 477
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 113191 08-08-2012 09:32 AM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
Realistically, good old boys with guns and feisty old ladies very quickly handed over their weapons during Katrina, no?
|
|
|
|
clottingagent lop guest User ID: 39965 08-08-2012 09:58 AM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
Gun Control: The historical record
... interesting.
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
---------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total
of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were
rounded up and exterminated
------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
----------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964.. >From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
|
|
|
|
Janus Registered User User ID: 13808 08-08-2012 11:12 AM
Posts: 4,786
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
They will offer reward cards, debit cards, and other bribes at first.
After that:
They will hold children hostage at schools till parents bring their guns.
They will bar the doors at churches on Sunday and kill everyone inside
with poison gas, then search their homes for firearms.
They will shut off electricity and water till guns are given up.
They can detect individual body odor signatures from 50k feet alt.
You think they cannot detect a firearm?
Think thug and you will know what they are capable of.
They can't get them all. They can't even get a tenth.
They will try.
They will die trying, and We The People will slog through illegals,
and collateral damage and starvation and thirst and poison, and
will keep them from their goals.
But their goal is not about guns, it's about liberty and the Constitution.
So, we will use our firearms to save our Constitution, wherein lies
the truth, that the rights defined are INHERENT. We will keep the knowledge
alive, and as many of ourselves as we can alive.
When they are dead, we will clean up.
When law is made meaningless for some, law becomes meaningless for all.
|
|
|
|
Blitzkreig Red Dawn is Real User ID: 53329 08-08-2012 11:13 AM
Posts: 10,986
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
nope
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 42015 08-08-2012 12:39 PM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
They could put a bounty on guns and known gun owners offering money, food or tax deductions.
|
|
|
|
flintstone lop guest User ID: 95037 08-08-2012 12:54 PM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
LoP Guest Wrote:They could put a bounty on guns and known gun owners offering money, food or tax deductions.
so go get your happy meal dipshit
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 42015 08-08-2012 01:10 PM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
flintstone Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:They could put a bounty on guns and known gun owners offering money, food or tax deductions.
so go get your happy meal dipshit
You can have my happy meal and the little toy that comes with it.
In tough economic times this would be easy to do.
|
|
|
|
Archyr I'm from the gubmint,and I'm here t help User ID: 63921 08-08-2012 01:13 PM
Posts: 2,581
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
Can they take all the pipes,firecrackers and lead from the country?
Think about it...
I am become Derp, destroyer of words
There is one constant in the universe, and that is change
|
|
|
|
flintstone lop guest User ID: 95037 08-08-2012 01:13 PM
|
RE: Realistically speaking, they can't take ALL GUNS correct?
LoP Guest Wrote:flintstone Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:They could put a bounty on guns and known gun owners offering money, food or tax deductions.
so go get your happy meal dipshit
You can have my happy meal and the little toy that comes with it.
In tough economic times this would be easy to do.
they have already offered cash, concert tickets etc as incentives to turn in weapons. mostly in kalifornia. look what it did for them. the last one i heard of a lady turned in a rocket launcher lol. anyways it has been tried, as times get rougher it will work better. but the fact remains they can have my weapons bullets first. now im gonna finish this smoke
|
|
|
|
|