Post: #1

Throughout ancient lore and purported history we have accounts of Reptilian humanoids or dragons, from the "olympics" of greece to the underground streets of new york it appears as though they've been with us forever and tonight we will have a discussion of these entities

So what are they?

Extraterrestrials?

Terrestrials?

Other dimensional? If so from which dimensions the lower4th? Or the 1st and 2nd dimensions?

Demons?

Humans?

Hallucinations?

Synthetic Light Constructs?

Reptilian Consciousness Of The human brain reflected onto the outside world?

Propaganda?

Genetic Experiments?

Evolved Dinosaurs?

Computers?

Military Deception?

Suits for entities without bodies to interact with the 3d dimension?

And how do we interact with them?

Can they be killed?

Who's side are they on?

How do they affect us?

Their Goals?

Society?

Benevolent or Malevolent?

What do people around here think?

Post: #2

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vida_a...ien_52.htm

Post: #3

Fuel for the coming New and Improved Project Bluebeam.

Your Alien Overlords will really be overpaid actors in convincing costumes flying about in flying saucers employing electro-kinetics with SDC.

Some day I'll put up videos of my garage built flying saucers.


No, I am not kidding.

Post: #4

LOL 1 or 2nd dimension? Would they be a dot or a line?

Post: #5

"La Bête Returns!

The final total of La Bête's killings, which took place in the closing years of the Ancien Tegine in France, was 25 women, 68 children, and 6 men. She seriously injured well over 30 others. The first officially recorded murder was Jeanne Boulet, aged fourteen, at les Ubas about July 3rd, 1764. The last definite killing was on June 18th, 1767 at Desges, the final victim being an unidentified little girl. La Bête was last witnessed strolling along at Sarlat, a prehistoric cave area just outside Gévaudan, on August 4th, 1767. Then La Bête as La Bête vanishes into the mist of history.

Had she been killed, as was claimed, or had she simply moved on?

Her attacks should not be considered in isolation. Similar killings had taken place nearly a century earlier, at Benais in 1693 --in that particular periods of terrorization over 100 definite killings nearly all women and children, (though the toll was possibly as high as 200) were committed by an animal exactly resembling La Bête. Some forty years after the period we will be studying, fresh attacks began, in Vivarias, between 1809 and 1813, when at least 21 children and adolescents were killed by a similar beast. Another long period of years elapses and we find the savagings in I'Indre from 1875 to 1879. The killings seem to have occurred mostly in four year periods of terrorization. Odd savagings by wolf-like beasts have gone on ever since up until 1954.

Descriptions of La Bête are the same for many sightings and for other beasts recorded in the region of France in the he centuries before and after her most famous killing spree. The prints and engravings show her almost universally as a rakish, elegant creature--after all, she was French--often in action on two legs. These stylish atmospheric drawings tend to swamp equally well expressed verbal descriptions, which were of a less elegant, more burly monster remotely derived from a wild boar or dog with a pig or catlike muzzle. A consistent factor is that when pounced on, and while fighting for their lives, victims were conscious of only an unbelievably fast-moving blurred mass of brownish fur, and were unable to give details.

She could flatten herself on the ground almost to invisibility, when she was said to look no bigger than a fox. Her pounce was like tat of a cat rather than the rushing up and biting of a dog or a wolf. People did escape by climbing trees, which she was never known to do. She liked attacking in an upright position, a stance used also when wading across shallow streams and prowling round houses at night, although she hardly ever killed during complete darkness, perhaps because her favorite prey--children--was tucked up at home in bed. However, she occasionally enjoyed killing romantically by moonlight. ..."





http://labete.7hunters.net/labetereturns.htm

Post: #6

BaDHaBiTt  Wrote:

LOL 1 or 2nd dimension? Would they be a dot or a line?

Was that a reply to me? I don't get it.

Both dots and lines are one dimensional.

Post: #7

"EVIDENCE OF WHAT 'THEY' ARE...

Mankind is enslaved.
There is enormous evidence on
earth as to what these entities are.

Publeo Indians called them:
Anazasi meaning:
Old ones - those not like us.
Dead ancestors.

Hopi Indians call them: Moqui
meaning:
Dead ones.

Navajo Indians called them: Dineh
meaning:
Enemy ancestors.

Mayan Indians called them: Toltecs meaning:
Giant – warring people.
Toltec is a word for ‘god’ – expanded Quetzalcoatl feathered serpent that created
the world.
Mayans viewed sacrifice like war of the Europeans.
They explained Europeans killed during a war – Mayans killed after a war.

Aztec Indians called them: Teotl meaning:
Demons – gods
When Cortes told the Aztecs to “kill” their gods.
The Aztec’s replied, “Our gods are already dead.” ..."

Post: #8

Buster  Wrote:

Fuel for the coming New and Improved Project Bluebeam.

Your Alien Overlords will really be overpaid actors in convincing costumes flying about in flying saucers employing electro-kinetics with SDC.

Some day I'll put up videos of my garage built flying saucers.


No, I am not kidding.

My alien overlords??

Are you pete peterson??

And could you elaborate on your theory I'm not familiar with SDC

Post: #9

Buster  Wrote:

BaDHaBiTt  Wrote:

LOL 1 or 2nd dimension? Would they be a dot or a line?

Was that a reply to me? I don't get it.

Both dots and lines are one dimensional.

Ok.. you are right... They may be squares from the 2nd dimension!

Post: #10

"How about every culture of Earths history had a name for them?

Wise up grasshopper!!

Nachash, (Hebrew);

Nagas, "serpent-people" (Hindu); Nagarjuna (Buddhism);

Nakash-Na, "Serpent Men" (Chaldean);

Kappa, "reptilian humanoids" and Tengu, "eagle-headed" reptilian humanoids (Japanese);

Lung Wang (Dragon Kings) The Lung are said to dwell either in the "celestial realm," that is, the stars and planets, or beneath the surface of the Earth (Chinese);

Utukku, "eagle-headed" reptilian humanoid dwarfs (Mesopotamian);

Nalusa Falaya, or "Long Black Being," who is humanoid yet slides on his stomach "like a snake." His pointed ears only accentuate his reptilian appearance. (American Choctaw Indians);

Fafnir, who begins as a humanoid titan and is transformed fully over time into a cave-dwelling dragon (Norse);

PIASA, (Dakota Indians) it was supposed to have terrifying red eyes and a long tail..." a monstrous demon with "bat's wings, and a body closely in human form; Camazotz, (Mayan-Aztec Death God) who took the form of a WINGED CREATURE who removes the heads of his followers who displeased him.

Nats, (Birma/Myanmar); Nagal, (Mexico);

Chet-U, Lizard Men; Hidden in the darkness, they emerge from their lairs to torment and use humans for their own purposes. (Native Americans)

More nonsense huh?

"In 1944 an accidental discovery of an even more controversial nature was made by Waldemar Julsrud at Acambaro, Mexico. Acambaro is in the state of Guanajuato, 175 miles northwest of Mexico City.

The strange archaeological site there yielded over 33,500 objects of ceramic; stone, including jade; and knives of obsidian (sharper than steel and still used today in heart surgery). Jalsrud, a prominent local German merchant, also found statues ranging from less than an inch to six feet in length depicting great reptiles, some of them in ACTIVE ASSOCIATION with humans - generally eating them, but in some bizarre statuettes an erotic association was indicated.

To observers many of these creatures resembled dinosaurs. Jalsrud crammed this collection into twelve rooms of his expanded house. There startling representations of Negroes, Orientals, and bearded Caucasians were included as were motifs of Egyptians, Sumerian and other ancient non-hemispheric civilizations, as well as portrayals of Bigfoot and aquatic monster-like creatures, weird human-animal mixtures, and a host of other inexplicable creations.

Teeth from an extinct Ice Age horse, the skeleton of a mammoth, and a number of human skulls were found at the same site as the ceramic artifacts. Radio-carbon dating in the laboratories of the University of Pennsylvania and additional tests using the thermoluminescence method of dating pottery were performed to determine the age of the objects. Results indicated the objects were made about 6,500 years ago, around 4,500 BC.

A team of experts at another university, shown Jalrud's half-dozen samples but unaware of their origin, ruled out the possibility that they could have been modern reproductions. However, they fell silent when told of their controversial source". (Archeological Cover-Ups, by David Hatcher Childress)

And what do you know, the missing 14th chapter of Daniel!!


[23] There was also a great dragon, which the Babylonians revered.
[24] And the king said to Daniel, "You cannot deny that this is a living god; so worship him."
[25] Daniel said, "I will worship the Lord my God, for he is the living God.
[26] But if you, O king, will give me permission, I will slay the dragon without sword or club." The king said, "I give you permission."
[27] Then Daniel took pitch, fat, and hair, and boiled them together and made cakes, which he fed to the dragon. The dragon ate them, and burst open. And Daniel said, "See what you have been worshiping!"
[28] When the Babylonians heard it, they were very indignant and conspired against the king, saying, "The king has become a Jew; he has destroyed Bel, and slain the dragon, and slaughtered the priests."

According to the above, Daniel was thrown into the lions den for destroying the statue of Bel, and killing the dragon that was worshipped in the temple of Bel!!"

Post: #11

Anonymous Alien  Wrote:

Buster  Wrote:

Fuel for the coming New and Improved Project Bluebeam.

Your Alien Overlords will really be overpaid actors in convincing costumes flying about in flying saucers employing electro-kinetics with SDC.

Some day I'll put up videos of my garage built flying saucers.


No, I am not kidding.

My alien overlords??

Are you pete peterson??

And could you elaborate on your theory I'm not familiar with SDC

Alien Overlords is a joke. No, I am not Mr. Peterson.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:S...ct_Current


SDC is switched DC current with two poles for positive and negative.

I am guessing from what you said that you are familiar with Electro-kinetics as seen here.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/main.htm

All of these designs are two dimensional wrapped around themselves. Using DC current a 3D design will do nothing but spin. With SDC the spin is cancelled and rotation can be controlled by the switching ratio.

Imagine the classic flying saucer shape. At the top a small incomplete loop for positive. The negative at the belt also an incomplete loop with the start/end on the opposing side. Spin is canceled with every switch.

They could easily build working flying saucers with todays tech. They wouldn't be able to carry a lot of weight or fly for extended periods without recharging or some new power storage method. Nor could they leave the atmosphere. But it would be convincing enough.

The problem I have been having is how to make them strong enough to not collapse from the electrostatic attractive force yet light enough to lift with my meager power supply. The parts I need are simply not available without an FCC license.

Post: #12

Buster  Wrote:

Anonymous Alien  Wrote:

Buster  Wrote:

Fuel for the coming New and Improved Project Bluebeam.

Your Alien Overlords will really be overpaid actors in convincing costumes flying about in flying saucers employing electro-kinetics with SDC.

Some day I'll put up videos of my garage built flying saucers.


No, I am not kidding.

My alien overlords??

Are you pete peterson??

And could you elaborate on your theory I'm not familiar with SDC

Alien Overlords is a joke. No, I am not Mr. Peterson.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:S...ct_Current


SDC is switched DC current with two poles for positive and negative.

I am guessing from what you said that you are familiar with Electro-kinetics as seen here.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/main.htm

All of these designs are two dimensional wrapped around themselves. Using DC current a 3D design will do nothing but spin. With SDC the spin is cancelled and rotation can be controlled by the switching ratio.

Imagine the classic flying saucer shape. At the top a small incomplete loop for positive. The negative at the belt also an incomplete loop with the start/end on the opposing side. Spin is canceled with every switch.

They could easily build working flying saucers with todays tech. They wouldn't be able to carry a lot of weight or fly for extended periods without recharging or some new power storage method. Nor could they leave the atmosphere. But it would be convincing enough.

The problem I have been having is how to make them strong enough to not collapse from the electrostatic attractive force yet light enough to lift with my meager power supply. The parts I need are simply not available without an FCC license.

Has this been peer reviewed?

Sounds unstable, how much force is needed? how would you contain the energy? what would happen to the objects inside? How would you direct the energy? How far out above the earth would you be able to go? What kind of environment is needed?

Sounds interesting and if you can verify your claims, what then?

And isn't this a Reptilian Discussion?

Post: #13

It has not been peer reviewed. What I describe is similar to something like the Ionic Breeze with a twist. Or, more correctly, without the twist.

The positive rips electrons off atoms and molecules in the air. This turns them into ions, charged particles. They are attracted to the negative. When they get close enough to the negative the ions will get back a lost electron.

Its like swimming through the air. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. As the ions are pulled down towards the negative the negative is pulled upwards with equal force.

SDC is a method of switching DC current. This change in current direction without Reversing current direction applies a force directly against the spin motion. Then at switching it reverses spin direction again.

The only purpose of SDC in this design is to counter the natural tendency for the fluid air to spin.

The power sources is anything that can generate high voltage DC current and a pair of switches. It is no different than DC in its danger or difficulty to contain.

Post: #14

2 types of humanoids on earth. One descended from reptilians the other from mammals.

Reptilians hold most of the power.

Post: #15

LoP Guest  Wrote:

2 types of humanoids on earth. One descended from reptilians the other from mammals.

Reptilians hold most of the power.

The idea that two separate evolutionary paths, beginning with completely different forms, could end in complex forms that are virtually indistinguishable is ridiculous.