News

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 117325 09-08-2012 10:30 PM

Richard Dawkins, that buffoon from family feud and "The Running Man" movie is now a scientific expert. Tissue

Seems he can single handedly disprove evolution.
Guess he was attending night school as an inmate of Stalag 13 !!!

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 117325 09-09-2012 01:48 AM

**SimmerSam**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Richard Dawkins, that buffoon from family feud and "The Running Man" movie is now a scientific expert.
Seems he can single handedly disprove evolution.
Guess he was attending night school as an inmate of Stalag 13 !!!

Disprove evolution? He has never done anything of the sort.

When was he on Family Fued or "the Running Man"

Is this whole thread just a joke?

**no 1 home** lop guest User ID: 101655 09-09-2012 03:02 AM

SimmerSam Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
Richard Dawkins, that buffoon from family feud and "The Running Man" movie is now a scientific expert.
Seems he can single handedly disprove evolution.
Guess he was attending night school as an inmate of Stalag 13 !!!

Disprove evolution? He has never done anything of the sort.

When was he on Family Fued or "the Running Man"

Is this whole thread just a joke?

Op just proved evolution from Unicorns

Richard Dawson (born Colin Lionel Emm; November 20, 1932 – June 2, 2012)

Dumbass

____________________________________
Creationists want Genetics to prove that they have superior DNA/Genetics. funny how the theory of Evolution caused Watson and Crick to investigate the Molecular foundation of life. which just goes on to prove that we are all made of the same stuff... even the fruit flies.. but not Unicorns...

The only logical response then is a hissy fit.

Heartflowers

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 119626 09-09-2012 03:18 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 60006 09-09-2012 03:58 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

What actually happened ?

Richard Dawkins Wrote:

In September 1997, I allowed an Australian film crew into my house in Oxford without realising that their purpose was creationist propaganda. In the course of a suspiciously amateurish interview, they issued a truculent challenge to me to “give an example of a genetic mutation or an evolutionary process which can be seen to increase the information in the genome.” It is the kind of question only a creationist would ask in that way, and it was at this point I tumbled to the fact that I had been duped into granting an interview to creationists — a thing I normally don’t do, for good reasons. In my anger I refused to discuss the question further, and told them to stop the camera. However, I eventually withdrew my peremptory termination of the interview as a whole. This was solely because they pleaded with me that they had come all the way from Australia specifically in order to interview me. Even if this was a considerable exaggeration, it seemed, on reflection, ungenerous to tear up the legal release form and throw them out. I therefore relented.

My generosity was rewarded in a fashion that anyone familiar with fundamentalist tactics might have predicted. When I eventually saw the film a year later 1, I found that it had been edited to give the false impression that I was incapable of answering the question about information content 2. In fairness, this may not have been quite as intentionally deceitful as it sounds. You have to understand that these people really believe that their question cannot be answered! Pathetic as it sounds, their entire journey from Australia seems to have been a quest to film an evolutionist failing to answer it.

For Richard Dawkins full answer to the fundie idiot con artists question try this link:

http://www.skeptics.com.au/publications/...challenge/