News

**Ishtahota** · (This post was last modified: 01-14-2012 06:25 PM by Ishtahota.)

Ron Paul: Rivals say he hates Republicans

Ron Paul’s rise has caught the party’s notice, and they’re not ignoring him any longer. Other front-runners have endured withering attacks this political season, and now it is the libertarian’s turn...

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Th...epublicans

In January 2008, the New Republic ran my story reporting the contents of monthly newsletters that Paul published throughout the 1980s and 1990s. While a handful of controversial passages from these bulletins had been quoted previously, I was able to track down nearly the entire archive, scattered between the University of Kansas and the Wisconsin Historical Society (both of which housed the newsletters in collections of extreme right-wing American political literature). Though particular articles rarely carried a byline, the vast majority were written in the first person, while the title of the newsletter, in its various iterations, always featured Paul’s name: Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, the Ron Paul Political Report, the Ron Paul Survival Report, and the Ron Paul Investment Letter. What I found was unpleasant.

“Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks,” read a typical article from the June 1992 “Special Issue on Racial Terrorism,” a supplement to the Ron Paul Political Report. Racial apocalypse was the most persistent theme of the newsletters; a 1990 issue warned of “The Coming Race War,” and an article the following year about disturbances in the Adams Morgan neighborhood of Washington, D.C., was entitled “Animals Take Over the D.C. Zoo.” Paul alleged that Martin Luther King Jr., “the world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours,” had also “seduced underage girls and boys.” The man who would later proclaim King a “hero” attacked Ronald Reagan for signing legislation creating the federal holiday in his name, complaining, “We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/c...13474.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E78yBOCjrpk

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 67917 12-22-2011 12:49 AM

This is why he will not be president.

Its simply too simple to attack him over it.

**Frigg Stuyvesant**

LoP Guest Wrote:

This is why he will not be president.

Its simply too simple to attack him over it.

Good observation.

I will vote for him anyway. The message needs to get out. now..

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 48349 12-22-2011 01:13 AM

Why don't they attack him for going on the Alex Jones show and calling Alex a friend?

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 67003 12-22-2011 01:13 AM

if any other candidate had that in their newsletter it would be over.

But Paultards dont care about it.

cause they are holier then thou arent they?

Jptdknpa

**Luvapottamus**

LoP Guest Wrote:

if any other candidate had that in their newsletter it would be over.

But Paultards dont care about it.

cause they are holier then thou arent they?

The NAACP cleared him of any role in that racist essay, or whatever it was.

The good thing is THAT'S ALL THEY GOT!

All they can do is say he's "unelectable" and "Iowa doesn't count"

-then-

"New Hampshire doesn't Count"
chuckle

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 67003 12-22-2011 01:18 AM

Luvapottamus Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
if any other candidate had that in their newsletter it would be over.

But Paultards dont care about it.

cause they are holier then thou arent they?

The NAACP cleared him of any role in that racist essay, or whatever it was.

The good thing is THAT'S ALL THEY GOT!

All they can do is say he's "unelectable" and "Iowa doesn't count"

-then-

"New Hampshire doesn't Count"

funny now the NAACP matters.

Jptdknpa

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 48349 12-22-2011 01:21 AM

Instead of backing his own party’s choice last time around(McCain), Paul endorsed a number of minor party candidates who signed on to a pledge to balance budgets, bring troops home, protect civil liberties, and investigate the Federal Reserve. These included Green Party standard bearer Cynthia McKinney, and independent candidate Ralph Nader.

“For whatever his failings as a Presidential candidate and conservative (and they were legion), no reasonable person would say that John McCain was worse than any of these clowns,” writes Wolf.

Clowns?
S977

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 48349 12-22-2011 01:22 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

Luvapottamus Wrote:
LoP Guest Wrote:
if any other candidate had that in their newsletter it would be over.

But Paultards dont care about it.

cause they are holier then thou arent they?

The NAACP cleared him of any role in that racist essay, or whatever it was.

The good thing is THAT'S ALL THEY GOT!

All they can do is say he's "unelectable" and "Iowa doesn't count"

-then-

"New Hampshire doesn't Count"

funny now the NAACP matters.

Founded in 1909, the NAACP is the nation's oldest and largest civil rights organization.

**Frak**

I've been hearing the attacks.... bummer that all the normal talking heads are on vacation and we're only hearing it from the 2nd tier talking heads. chuckle

I wonder if people realize that pretty much everything they say is a lie

**Tag**

The biggie they're (MSM) using is that RP is going to give the election to Obama by "making the GOP weak...whatever...

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 48349 12-22-2011 01:24 AM

Tag Wrote:

The biggie they're (MSM) using is that RP is going to give the election to Obama by "making the GOP weak...whatever...

RP would crush Obama.

**Luvapottamus**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Luvapottamus Wrote:
LoP Guest Wrote:
if any other candidate had that in their newsletter it would be over.

But Paultards dont care about it.

cause they are holier then thou arent they?

The NAACP cleared him of any role in that racist essay, or whatever it was.

The good thing is THAT'S ALL THEY GOT!

All they can do is say he's "unelectable" and "Iowa doesn't count"

-then-

"New Hampshire doesn't Count"

funny now the NAACP matters.

I've always supported the NAACP.

I could change my mind on that if you know something I don't know that makes them a villian...

(I'm not a fan of the ADL or the SPLC)

But I like the ACLU.

What's the problem?

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 67742 12-22-2011 01:31 AM

those letters are from the same time period and written by the same guy, NOT ron paul.

they tried this last time in 2007. FAIL Jhikpghf

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 48349 12-22-2011 01:39 AM

LoP Guest Wrote:

if any other candidate had that in their newsletter it would be over.

But Paultards dont care about it.

cause they are holier then thou arent they?

Uh.... Gingrich called the Palestinians an invented people on ABC just a couple weeks ago. That is a HUGE f*cking MISTAKE. on TV. in front of everyone. out of his lips.

Someone who wrote for Paul's newsletter said some bad things 20 years ago and this is supposed to somehow deem Ron Paul unelectable? Give me a break! Heartflowers