Post: #196

Funny. He's got more black supporters than any other candidate (except Obama, of course).

Post: #197

Ishtahota  Wrote:

President Ron Paul? Ron Paul and the John Birch Society

Rep. Paul's ideas are so extreme that no sensible voter would give him a second look if it wasn't for the Uncle Fuzzy persona.

How extreme? Here's some of what Uncle Fuzzy told a group of young followers he'd do if he made it to the Oval Office.
•Allow anybody to mint money by passing the "...Free Competition in Currency Act, which repeals legal tender laws and all taxes on gold and silver.";
•Force the FDA and the FTC to allow any dietary supplement onto the market "...unless they have clear evidence that the manufacturer's clams are not true." This is a prescription for endless lawsuits.
•Kill Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid for future generations;
•End Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits for people getting them now --but giving them "...time to prepare for the day when responsibility for providing aide is returned to those organizations best able to administer compassionate and effective help--churches and private charities."
•Fire up to 800,000 federal workers through attrition, not filling vacancies for "non-essential" jobs.
•Veto budgets he didn't like;
•Substantially defund federal education programs;
•Likewise, defund the Byrne Grants that help local police fight interstate crime; something even the conservative Heritage Foundation opposes.


Not very fuzzy, is it? And that's just part of his list. You can read the whole text here.

Where did Rep. Paul get these ideas? Well, mostly from the seed bank of the John Birch Society. While he's not a member, he's been close to it since at least the 1970s.
[snip]


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-rei...tml?ref=tw

I'm missing the parts where it is extreme.....medicare, social security, fda.......2 ponzi schemes and one corrupt bunch of mother fuckers.

Post: #198

The Evil AC  Wrote:

Funny. He's got more black supporters than any other candidate (except Obama, of course).

Which means the "letters" mean nothing in the eyes of truth.

Post: #199

Is incredible. I was merely reading some of the latest gold new on Gallup news. For the heck of it I typed in Ron Paul in the search in the upper right hand section of the page and lo and behind not a single story about Dr Paul and EVERY heading was romney. Check my search terms ( Ron Paul ) here:

http://www.gallup.com/Search/Default.asp...s=&i=&t...

It would appear that any search for Ron Paul merely yields mitt romney. I onlt clicked on page 2 of the results but not a single Ron Paul story appeared when searching for Ron Paul! As though he ( we ) doesn't exist! Same as how the votes are being counted no doubt. The bastards. In some countries they would already be massing in the streets.

Unbelievable. Might as well be in china

Post: #200

Ishtahota  Wrote:

Is incredible. I was merely reading some of the latest gold new on Gallup news. For the heck of it I typed in Ron Paul in the search in the upper right hand section of the page and lo and behind not a single story about Dr Paul and EVERY heading was romney. Check my search terms ( Ron Paul ) here:

http://www.gallup.com/Search/Default.asp...s=&i=&t...

It would appear that any search for Ron Paul merely yields mitt romney. I onlt clicked on page 2 of the results but not a single Ron Paul story appeared when searching for Ron Paul! As though he ( we ) doesn't exist! Same as how the votes are being counted no doubt. The bastards. In some countries they would already be massing in the streets.

Unbelievable. Might as well be in china

Ah but they either inherited or stole billions Ish. According to them, just because they have multi millions in financial fraud money they can call all the shots. It's their duty to dictate to the poorer and less socially acceptable.

Why should social and economic inferiors dictate anything to the uber wealthy elites?

Post: #201

The media just won't let up on Ron Paul

TAMPA, May 8, 2012 – It’s official. Ron Paul has won two states. He’s probably going to win more.

In response, most media outlets have chosen to ramp up their passive-aggressive attacks on Paul’s campaign.

Ever since he announced that he would seek the Republican nomination for president back in 2007, Ron Paul has been covered like no other major party candidate in U.S. history.

Let’s review:

During his previous campaign for the 2008 Republican nomination, the media largely pretended he wasn’t running at all. When he was covered, virtually every article or segment described him as a “gadfly” and his campaign as “quixotic.” Even before the first debate was held, we were assured at least twice in every news piece that Paul “had little chance of winning the nomination.”

At the start of this election cycle, the gadfly’s quixotic campaign was covered in much the same manner. Admittedly, the insinuations that Paul’s views were “fringe” or “crazy” had diminished. It’s hard to call someone crazy after all of his economic predictions come true and all of the predictions of his opponents prove wrong.

Nevertheless, the media covering the 2012 nomination race initially pretended that Paul didn’t exist, prompting Jon Stewart’s now classic lampoon. After Paul’s virtual tie in the Ames, Iowa straw poll, we were told that the new “top tier” Republican candidates were Rick Perry and Michelle Bachman.

Remember them? Perry dropped out after failing to recover from forgetting the names of the federal departments he proposed to eliminate in a debate. Among Bachman’s finest moments was the New Hampshire speech in which she asserted that the American Revolutionary War broke out at Lexington and Concord in…New Hampshire.

Once the media could no longer ignore Ron Paul, we were once again assured that he had no chance to win the Republican nomination. When it appeared that he might win the Iowa caucuses, we were told that a Paul win would be meaningless. When he finished a close third in Iowa and second in New Hampshire, the media acknowledged that his performance was surprising but maintained that he still couldn’t win.

He was in better shape than Bill Clinton was at that point in 1992. Why didn’t Clinton get the same treatment?

The media again began ignoring Ron Paul’s campaign after Super Tuesday, despite his predictions of eventual victories in several of the caucus states. After his predictions started proving accurate, the media immediately began suggesting that there was something sneaky or undemocratic about his strategy, even though it is perfectly legitimate.

Now that Paul has won the majority of delegates from Maine and Nevada to the Republican National Convention (RNC) and his predictions for similar results in Missouri, Washington, Iowa, and other states suddenly sound very credible, the media have a new disclaimer to add to the list.

Not only must any mention of Paul contain the usual negatives, but the deliberately republican (small “r”) delegate selection process is suddenly “arcane.”

According to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, arcane means:

“known or knowable only to the initiate : secret <arcane rites>; broadly: mysterious, obscure <arcane explanations”

The rites of initiation during the ancient mysteries at Eleusis were arcane. The activities of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors are arcane. The secret handshake known to members of Fred Flintstone’s Loyal Order of Water Buffaloes Lodge No. 26 is arcane.

The delegate selection process for the Maine Republican Party is not arcane. It is published on the party’s website in sixth grade English and is available to everyone. However, since Ron Paul has had success within that process, it now seems that disparaging implications must be made about it, in addition to him.

With all of the disclaimers that the media attach to coverage of Paul, it’s starting to take several minutes just to get to the actual “news” in the article.

[snip]

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/n...-ron-paul/

Post: #202

Post: #203

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pots7T4vO...r_embedded