Who ordered slaughter in the Abuse


Our correspondent reports from Damascus



In order that in 1999 to justify before mankind aggression against Yugoslavia, one large provocation was required. And it was arranged in the Kosovan village Rachak – the Albanian bandits and supporting them «the international observers» (agents of NATO) gave out the Albanian fighters of the Liberation army of Kosovo, killed in battle with the Serbian law enforcement agencies, for civilians who simply so were cut by malicious Serbians. So NATO aggression against Yugoslavia, undertaken in defiance of all norms of international law, without the sanction of UNSF was justified.
The same scenario try to carry out and in Syria. And though essentially new directors of similar scenarios can't think up anything, they every time should introduce amendments.
Already it is not enough to change clothes of fighters of the Syrian free army (even names are similar!) in civil clothes. That provocation looked more convincing, they should kill real people that, of course, even more terribly.
Provocation in the Syrian village the Abuse as a result of which more than hundred people were lost, risks to fail. Appears more and more proofs of that governmental armies, and terrorists are guilty of the tragedy not. The initial version about that inhabitants of the village fell as a result of settlement shelling, the next day cracked on seams: it became clear that people were lost from bullet and knife wounds – gangster punishment is available.
The version cooked up without delay that it was made by pro-governmental forces, certain шабиха, also didn't sustain criticism. First, among victims there were supporters of authorities in power. Secondly, if to think, whether slaughter of the Syrian power is favorable? No, isn't present and once again not, after all a stare of the world community is now directed on Damascus. And here slaughter moreover on the eve of Kofi Annan's visit was just favorable to bandits to transfer arrows to a so-called mode.
What occurred actually?
The truth is that bandits wanted suit one more Abuse. Wanted and didn't turn out. They managed to kill only nine people, among which majority of the woman and children.
But inhabitants of one of fateful settlements managed to report to law enforcement agencies about invasion of fighters.
To the aid of inhabitants security forces came. Security officers prevented slaughter of civilians – innocent people who should be lost only in order that tapes of world news agencies blew up a new information bomb.
As eyewitnesses tell, bandits outraged upon bodies of the victims: they were with the connected hands, some bodies were dismembered or scorched.
To a place of the tragedy UN observers from Homs tried to pass. But fighters managed to grasp a road site between Hama and Homs and consequently to a place of the tragedy it was not possible to pass to observers. Probably, just because provocation wasn't successful and to bandits was what to hide.
And how "mass slaughter" confirmation? With it decided not to stand on ceremony especially. If as slaughter confirmation in the Abuse used the photo of 2003 from Iraq, what there? Why not to use the tragedy photo in the Abuse and not to give out it for the documentary photograph of a new information bomb?
As to attack of UN observers by governmental forces – why again fault unsubstantially shift on the Syrian army?
I can tell as the witness who has visited Homs: soldiers of the Syrian army protect UN observers and care of them unless motes from them don't blow off.
In Safir hotel in Homs UN observers spend the night in the best numbers, and the Syrian soldiers, protecting them, sleep on mattresses on a floor.
When a few days ago because of problems with mobile communication the delegation of observers was lost on the road from Boors to Homs – simply lost the way and called in not there, – they addressed for the help not to somebody, and to army. And the Syrian officer went to help out them, brought to integrities and safety.
The Syrian army and the government of Syria don't do anything that could damage to observers. But gangster attacks on them not a rarity.
As, judging by stories of inhabitants of settlements of Mazraat-al-Kbeyr and Maarzaf, to bandits was what to hide. After all the mass slaughter which can be fallen down on the government, wasn't successful. Nine people whom bandits managed to kill, of course, it is possible to give out for army victims, but, probably, scale not that. And information on a mass slaughter already arrived earlier, than the great number of people was cut out. And from where it arrived? Yes all from the same «observatories on human rights in Syria» – already known very doubtful pseudo-source of information which copes the owner of a snackbar in London.
Also there was an attempt of one more provocation similar on happened in Abuse. It was on June 6 near Latakia, in the settlement El-Haffa. The armed fighters attacked the settlement and tried to arrange the second Abuse. However army and locals rejected pressure of bandits. And that with despair that new slaughter wasn't successful, managed to set fire to a building of ruling party of BAAS (Party of the Arab socialist revival) and some governmental buildings. Unfortunately, the army too has in loss, reflecting this attack.
Addressing to parliament, the president of Syria Bashar Al-Assad warned that such provocations will proceed. Unfortunately, its forecast comes true. The Syrian government put in such conditions that it is compelled to come true all the time, and further opponents of Syria include strange logic: a pier, you justify – means, it is guilty.
And for some reason world mass media don't pay attention to one important point. On June 4 armed "opposition" declared that won't pursue the scheme Annan. But after all it is the plan supported by UN Security Council. For it voted both the USA, and other countries from so-called friends of Syria.
And if one of the parties refuses to pursue the scheme, unless it would be not logical to put pressure upon this party?

Elena ГРОМОВА
Damascus