News

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101058 06-09-2012 02:49 PM

I think he should walk away scott free. Send a message to antisocial assholes everywhere.

**Average Housewife**

LoP Guest Wrote:

I think he should walk away scott free. Send a message to antisocial assholes everywhere.

OMG, if I could get off scott free for taking out every asshole I encounter... Jptdknpa

Me, a gun, PMS, and the idiot at the H.E.B. who sent a hearing impaired guy to help me tell which patio furniture went with which set? After I explained I needed help figuring out the sets, not just helping to the truck? And then she got pissy when I went back in and explained I needed someone who could speak in English, Spanish, Italian, but NOT sign language? Yeah, let's make THAT legal. I was worried my girlfriend with me didn't shoot that asshat, because she's the type who would have taken out both, with a couple for more for good measure. chuckle

**Arch Phoenix**

Archyr Wrote:

After watching the video, I gotta say, if he didn't shoot them,they probably woulda taken his gun from him and killed him with it. The music was pretty loud,and they where acting like drunk frat boys.
I'd say if he walked down there unarmed,he probably would have gotten his ass whupped pretty bad.

Its incredible how the nutjobs defend this creep.
he went to his neighbours house, armed. started the fight and then shoot him cause he shat his pants.

Seriously, if these are the people representing gunowners, take them away from them.

Every real man would have went their and started a brawl or just called the cops.

The guntard was a pussy.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 89915 06-09-2012 03:46 PM

Arch Phoenix Wrote:

Archyr Wrote:
After watching the video, I gotta say, if he didn't shoot them,they probably woulda taken his gun from him and killed him with it. The music was pretty loud,and they where acting like drunk frat boys.
I'd say if he walked down there unarmed,he probably would have gotten his ass whupped pretty bad.
Its incredible how the nutjobs defend this creep.
he went to his neighbours house, armed. started the fight and then shoot him cause he shat his pants.

Seriously, if these are the people representing gunowners, take them away from them.

Every real man would have went their and started a brawl or just called the cops.

The guntard was a pussy.

You just want to see another latino in jail. Zimmermen and now this guy.

Guy gets surrounded by 10 white drunks and defends himself and you want him lynched. Disgusting and typical.

Zimmermen now this guy.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 89915 06-09-2012 03:51 PM

They surrounded him like a bunch of wolves. Look at the video. The shooting didn't start until one of them ran up laughing like a drunk jugglo. I bet coke and weed will show up in the toxicology report too on top of being legally drunk.

It was justified. And all you racist dick weeds who think he should be locked up KNOW this is bullshit. You just want to see another "wet back" locked away in the system. You nazi creeps.

**Kentucky Fried Genocide**

LoP Guest Wrote:

Arch Phoenix Wrote:
Archyr Wrote:
After watching the video, I gotta say, if he didn't shoot them,they probably woulda taken his gun from him and killed him with it. The music was pretty loud,and they where acting like drunk frat boys.
I'd say if he walked down there unarmed,he probably would have gotten his ass whupped pretty bad.
Its incredible how the nutjobs defend this creep.
he went to his neighbours house, armed. started the fight and then shoot him cause he shat his pants.

Seriously, if these are the people representing gunowners, take them away from them.

Every real man would have went their and started a brawl or just called the cops.

The guntard was a pussy.

You just want to see another latino in jail. Zimmermen and now this guy.

Guy gets surrounded by 10 white drunks and defends himself and you want him lynched. Disgusting and typical.

Zimmermen now this guy.

Yeah hes an anti gun, racist against whites, douche. And that's ok.
Because I'm the opposite.

**Kentucky Fried Genocide** · (This post was last modified: 06-09-2012 03:53 PM by Kentucky Fried Genocide.)

Kentucky Fried Genocide Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
Arch Phoenix Wrote:
Its incredible how the nutjobs defend this creep.
he went to his neighbours house, armed. started the fight and then shoot him cause he shat his pants.

Seriously, if these are the people representing gunowners, take them away from them.

Every real man would have went their and started a brawl or just called the cops.

The guntard was a pussy.

You just want to see another latino in jail. Zimmermen and now this guy.

Guy gets surrounded by 10 white drunks and defends himself and you want him lynched. Disgusting and typical.

Zimmermen now this guy.

Yeah hes an anti gun, (racist against whites too)douche. And that's ok.
Because I'm the opposite.

Fixed

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 89915 06-09-2012 03:56 PM

Heres an article on Jim Crow era gun laws:

http://reason.com/archives/2005/02/15/th...nomobile=1

Take away the guns from the minorities and what do you have? A plantation inside the crumbling innercities run by steroid abusing white cops and rich "liberals".

Gun control is not only immoral it is RACIST.

Minorities along with everyone else have a universal right to defend themselves and their property.

**Ahriman**

Does anybody see the obvious results of thes bad syg laws?

Lack of respect for human life.

Victimless murders.

Not to mention we can all pretend it's 1880 and go shoot 'em up.

Except for the little bit about how suckas used to duel back in the day like real men.

Not like little scared retards 'standing their ground' thinking their Clint Eastwood or some shit.

For the love of whatever you call holy.

For fuckssake.

Anon

**Archyr**

Arch Phoenix Wrote:

Archyr Wrote:
After watching the video, I gotta say, if he didn't shoot them,they probably woulda taken his gun from him and killed him with it. The music was pretty loud,and they where acting like drunk frat boys.
I'd say if he walked down there unarmed,he probably would have gotten his ass whupped pretty bad.
Its incredible how the nutjobs defend this creep.
he went to his neighbours house, armed. started the fight and then shoot him cause he shat his pants.

Seriously, if these are the people representing gunowners, take them away from them.

Every real man would have went their and started a brawl or just called the cops.

The guntard was a pussy.

You can't reason with a drunk. You really can't reason with a bunch of drunks with a mob mentality. He wasnt on dudes property,either. I think he's rather be labelled "pussy" than victim #61218-004-a, doa.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 89915 06-09-2012 04:39 PM

Ahriman Wrote:

Does anybody see the obvious results of thes bad syg laws?

Lack of respect for human life.

Victimless murders.

Not to mention we can all pretend it's 1880 and go shoot 'em up.

Except for the little bit about how suckas used to duel back in the day like real men.

Not like little scared retards 'standing their ground' thinking their Clint Eastwood or some shit.

For the love of whatever you call holy.

For fuckssake.

You'd rather live in 1984?

**The ghost of Charlton Heston** lop guest User ID: 101381 06-09-2012 04:49 PM

Ahriman Wrote:

...we can all pretend it's 1880 and go shoot 'em up.

Exactly! This is the 21st century.

In 2010 there were 12,996 murders in the USA. 8,775 of these homicides involved the use of a firearm. That means 67.52%, or over 2/3rds of all criminal killings involved firearms.

In the same period how many "justifiable homicides by private citizens", presumably in self defence, were there? 232.

Yep, 232 against 8,775. That must make you gun nutjobs feel much safer as you lay there at night cuddling up to your arsenal.

Despite the obscene proliferation of firearms in the USA, the effect as a deterrent is pitifully insignificant. The wannabe Rambo gun lobby use the deterrence argument without any real proof that it actually works.

What is undeniable is that countries with stricter gun control laws than USA have a much lower level of firearm homicides.

This is the 21st century, not the 1880s.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/...e-us-state
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/cri...rtbl15.xls

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101374 06-09-2012 04:51 PM

Kentucky Fried Genocide Wrote:

Kentucky Fried Genocide Wrote:
LoP Guest Wrote:
You just want to see another latino in jail. Zimmermen and now this guy.

Guy gets surrounded by 10 white drunks and defends himself and you want him lynched. Disgusting and typical.

Zimmermen now this guy.

Yeah hes an anti gun, (racist against whites too)douche. And that's ok.
Because I'm the opposite and a gay.

Fixed

Fixed

**Ahriman**

The ghost of Charlton
Heston Wrote:

Ahriman Wrote:
...we can all pretend it's 1880 and go shoot 'em up.
Exactly! This is the 21st century.

In 2010 there were 12,996 murders in the USA. 8,775 of these homicides involved the use of a firearm. That means 67.52%, or over 2/3rds of all criminal killings involved firearms.

In the same period how many "justifiable homicides by private citizens", presumably in self defence, were there? 232.

Yep, 232 against 8,775. That must make you gun nutjobs feel much safer as you lay there at night cuddling up to your arsenal.

Despite the obscene proliferation of firearms in the USA, the effect as a deterrent is pitifully insignificant. The wannabe Rambo gun lobby use the deterrence argument without any real proof that it actually works.

What is undeniable is that countries with stricter gun control laws than USA have a much lower level of firearm homicides.

This is the 21st century, not the 1880s.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/...e-us-state
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/cri...rtbl15.xls

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 99014 06-09-2012 04:54 PM

Did she get wind of the alteration outside her door and finally turn down her blairing music ? ! Scream1