|
Thread Rating:
- 13 Votes - 1.62 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
|
The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
|
ZeroToad Seeker of Mistruth User ID: 87273 04-01-2012 02:56 AM
Posts: 2,716
|
RE: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
The age of the Earth isn't the problem, it's the age of the Universe that's the problem.
The Universe, in its current form, is sum where in the neighborhood of a centillion^centillion^centillion earth years old.
That is based on the Galactic Egg Timer NASA found and calculating how many galaxies currently exist, then reverse birthing.
Ribbit
"He that kNot seeketh the fool within, seeketh fools without." - O.T.P.
"Tis better to be right and wrong than wrong and right." - O.T.P.
"The truth can be found in a lie but a lie cannot be found in the truth." - O.T.P.
"The Law of Life minus finite (Life - f = Lie) dictates that the best place to hide the truth is in a Lie." - O.T.P.
|
|
|
|
Wretch Fossil Registered User User ID: 87596 04-01-2012 07:22 AM
Posts: 201
|
RE: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
( new edition ) The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong
The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2).
The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the “Genesis Rock”, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the “Genesis Rock”? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the “Genesis Rock” and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).
The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old “Genesis Rock”.
Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_..._were_used
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420
Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 48475 04-01-2012 07:24 AM
|
RE: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
Wretch Fossil Wrote:The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the “Genesis Rock”, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the “Genesis Rock”? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the “Genesis Rock” and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).
The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.
Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_..._were_used
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420
Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
The entire concept of Math is wrong.
|
|
|
|
daisy lop guest User ID: 48475 04-01-2012 07:24 AM
|
RE: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
Wretch Fossil Wrote:The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the “Genesis Rock”, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the “Genesis Rock”? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the “Genesis Rock” and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).
The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.
Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_..._were_used
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420
Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
The entire concept of Math is wrong.
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 81352 04-01-2012 11:57 AM
|
RE: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
That site the OP linked is hilarious. Blood vessels and fat cells in meteorites? Too funny. Anyone with even the slightest knowledge of geology knows those are not blood vessels/fat cells. Whoever wrote all that is a deluded person who purposely omitted important information from his "evidence" in order to make facts fit his theory.
|
|
|
|
Wretch Fossil Registered User User ID: 87618 04-01-2012 12:46 PM
Posts: 201
|
RE: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
(New edition) The age of Earth is terribly wrong
The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth.
The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the “Genesis Rock”, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the “Genesis Rock”? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the “Genesis Rock” and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).
The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old “Genesis Rock”.
Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years(4.54 × 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples….Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in calcium andaluminium) – the oldest known solid constituents within meteorites that are formed within the solar system – are 4.567 billion years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_..._were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: “Some meteorites are furthermore considered to represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk was formed.[26] “
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420
Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
|
|
|
|
Ðґℙ☺ṧ⊥мαη Disgruntled but unarmed User ID: 39573 04-01-2012 03:45 PM
Posts: 11,782
|
RE: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
LoP Guest Wrote:That site the OP linked is hilarious. Blood vessels and fat cells in meteorites? Too funny. Anyone with even the slightest knowledge of geology knows those are not blood vessels/fat cells. Whoever wrote all that is a deluded person who purposely omitted important information from his "evidence" in order to make facts fit his theory.
You know how people can get drunk on religion? The OP is an alcholic
on religion.
"Conservatives want people not to even have to think about government. It's kind of like an
operating system in a computer. You just want it to work. Liberals want to run the operating
system, and they want to use the OS against you, or their political enemies."
-Rush Limbaugh
DrPostman BsD
|
|
|
|
Wretch Fossil Registered User User ID: 87808 04-02-2012 01:30 PM
Posts: 201
|
RE: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
(New edition) The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong
The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is eternal or at least billions of years older than that. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth.
The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the “Genesis Rock”, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the “Genesis Rock”? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the “Genesis Rock” and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).
The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because 99.99% of planets had existed for billions of years before animals lived on any of them. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old “Genesis Rock”.
Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years(4.54 × 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples….Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in calcium andaluminium) – the oldest known solid constituents within meteorites that are formed within the solar system – are 4.567 billion years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_..._were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: “Some meteorites are furthermore considered to represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk was formed.[26] “
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420
Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
|
|
|
|
2nd Best lop guest User ID: 82882 04-02-2012 01:33 PM
|
RE: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
But but but ......our Prime Minister tells us Earth is only some 6000 years old, how can this be?
|
|
|
|
|