Post: #31

Cascinova  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Wow, OP got a lot of sides stirred up. You can tell who is defending the evil agenda here.

Good work.

You can tell who is a brainwashed christian tard.

Hail Satan, Comrade Cascinova!

Post: #32

Cascinova  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Wow, OP got a lot of sides stirred up. You can tell who is defending the evil agenda here.

Good work.

You can tell who is a brainwashed christian tard, and who doesn't know how to think for themselves and who blames all the world's problems on a make believe character from a fairy tale book.

+1

Post: #33

HarryCanyon  Wrote:

Cascinova  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Wow, OP got a lot of sides stirred up. You can tell who is defending the evil agenda here.

Good work.

You can tell who is a brainwashed christian tard, and who doesn't know how to think for themselves and who blames all the world's problems on a make believe character from a fairy tale book.

+1

Post: #34

LoP Guest  Wrote:

HarryCanyon  Wrote:

Cascinova  Wrote:

You can tell who is a brainwashed christian tard, and who doesn't know how to think for themselves and who blames all the world's problems on a make believe character from a fairy tale book.

+1

Sick Predictive Programming Movie Where Youngsters Kill Each Other
March 28, 2012 16:15 THEUNHIVEDMIND 3 Comments

Shocked youngsters ‘are walking out of The Hunger Games’ as experts demand film’s certificate is raised to 15

By Liz Thomas and Alison Boshoff
PUBLISHED: 21:54, 27 March 2012 | UPDATED: 12:55, 28 March 2012

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...movie.html

Psychologists, child health professionals and parents yesterday joined calls for The Hunger Games to have its rating raised to a 15 because of its violent content.

Children who see the controversial film are at risk of having its disturbing scenes ‘hard-wired’ into their brains, one expert warned.

The movie – about teenagers in a totalitarian future being forced to kill each other in gladiatorial combat – was initially given a 15 certificate by the British Board of Film Classification but this was lowered to a 12A after producers agreed to make several cuts.

However, with concerns about the film’s adult themes growing, a BBFC insider has admitted that it remains a ‘borderline’ case for a 12A rating – which means children aged 12 and over can see it alone, while younger children can see it if accompanied by an adult.

Some parents claimed their children had been left so distressed by the film that they had to leave the cinema early.

One mother said: ‘The fact that you actually see kids killing other kids is something I would not want a 12-year-old to watch.’

TWO HOURS OF BRUTALITY

Despite being aimed at young teenagers, The Hunger Games includes several disturbing scenes.

An especially brutal part of the 142-minute film depicts a bloodbath in which many of the young contestants die at the start of the games.

Later, a boy is mauled by a pack of mutated dogs before being shot in the head with an arrow to put him out of his misery.

Elsewhere, a girl of 12 is speared through her abdomen by a rival, while another scene features a teenage girl’s skull being smashed with a rock as she tries to slash the heroine’s throat.

One teenager snaps a younger boy’s neck before throwing his limp body on the floor.

Even Zygi Kamasa, chief executive of Lionsgate, the company behind the film, said he would not let his ten-year-old daughter watch the movie, which he admitted had a ‘lot of adult themes’ and ‘frightening and gory scenes’.

Geoffrey Beattie, professor of psychology at Manchester University, says watching teens killing each other will have a stronger effect on young people than adult battle scenes.

He said: ‘If you identify with the characters then it is going to seem more familiar and … the things that happen will feel more visceral and have a stronger emotional impact on you.

There is a danger that there is so much death or violence that teens become desensitised.’

Many have defended the film, insisting it reflects the difficult content of the Suzanne Collins book on which it is based.

But writing about the film on her website, best-selling author and paediatrician Dr Meg Meeker said: ‘Kids process images they construct in their minds from written words differently than they process large, hyper-real images on a screen.

‘During the preteen and teen years, children’s minds are mentally pliable. They are being hard-wired… So, when an image comes into a teen’s brain it melds into that wiring and sticks.’

The BBFC said it had received a small number of complaints from people who have seen the film.

The Hunger Games, which stars Jennifer Lawrence, Woody Harrelson and Donald Sutherland, has grossed £5million in the UK in its opening weekend, twice as much as the opening instalment of another teen favourite, the Twilight Saga.

Post: #35

Easy to tell who is too stupid to understand the spiritual warfare that goes on around us every day wand who isn't...

Your either blind, a shill, or complicit in the satanic agenda if you think this stuff is a joke.

Ahriman, your one dimensional thinking makes it very easy to tell how unable you are to discern things from a spiritual standpoint. Yes, Lucifer does mean light bearer. He is also a real fallen angel that the kings of this world bow down to and worship. You can whine all you want and whip out your dictionary to try to school everyone, but until you have experienced the spirit realm or been to on of the ritual gatherings that freemasons have where they conjure up demons, I suggest you stop spreading your trite definitions. Satan is called "the king of THIS world" for a reason. He gives human leaders the power they weild over the rest of us through black magic and sorcery, so he can work towards his goal of making gods creation worship him, instead of the prince of peace, the king of kings, Jesus Christ. Wise up.

Post: #36

Ahriman  Wrote:

Firstly lucifer means light bearing. It is an adjective. A description. Jesus said I am the lucifer of the world.

Satan on the other hand derives from the hebrew word for accuser. An accuser can be a person, place, thing or situation.

Do you see the difference between the two?

Sick Predictive Programming Movie Where Youngsters Kill Each Other
March 28, 2012 16:15 THEUNHIVEDMIND 3 Comments

Shocked youngsters ‘are walking out of The Hunger Games’ as experts demand film’s certificate is raised to 15

By Liz Thomas and Alison Boshoff
PUBLISHED: 21:54, 27 March 2012 | UPDATED: 12:55, 28 March 2012

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...movie.html

Psychologists, child health professionals and parents yesterday joined calls for The Hunger Games to have its rating raised to a 15 because of its violent content.

Children who see the controversial film are at risk of having its disturbing scenes ‘hard-wired’ into their brains, one expert warned.

The movie – about teenagers in a totalitarian future being forced to kill each other in gladiatorial combat – was initially given a 15 certificate by the British Board of Film Classification but this was lowered to a 12A after producers agreed to make several cuts.

However, with concerns about the film’s adult themes growing, a BBFC insider has admitted that it remains a ‘borderline’ case for a 12A rating – which means children aged 12 and over can see it alone, while younger children can see it if accompanied by an adult.

Some parents claimed their children had been left so distressed by the film that they had to leave the cinema early.

One mother said: ‘The fact that you actually see kids killing other kids is something I would not want a 12-year-old to watch.’

TWO HOURS OF BRUTALITY

Despite being aimed at young teenagers, The Hunger Games includes several disturbing scenes.

An especially brutal part of the 142-minute film depicts a bloodbath in which many of the young contestants die at the start of the games.

Later, a boy is mauled by a pack of mutated dogs before being shot in the head with an arrow to put him out of his misery.

Elsewhere, a girl of 12 is speared through her abdomen by a rival, while another scene features a teenage girl’s skull being smashed with a rock as she tries to slash the heroine’s throat.

One teenager snaps a younger boy’s neck before throwing his limp body on the floor.

Even Zygi Kamasa, chief executive of Lionsgate, the company behind the film, said he would not let his ten-year-old daughter watch the movie, which he admitted had a ‘lot of adult themes’ and ‘frightening and gory scenes’.

Geoffrey Beattie, professor of psychology at Manchester University, says watching teens killing each other will have a stronger effect on young people than adult battle scenes.

He said: ‘If you identify with the characters then it is going to seem more familiar and … the things that happen will feel more visceral and have a stronger emotional impact on you.

There is a danger that there is so much death or violence that teens become desensitised.’

Many have defended the film, insisting it reflects the difficult content of the Suzanne Collins book on which it is based.

But writing about the film on her website, best-selling author and paediatrician Dr Meg Meeker said: ‘Kids process images they construct in their minds from written words differently than they process large, hyper-real images on a screen.

‘During the preteen and teen years, children’s minds are mentally pliable. They are being hard-wired… So, when an image comes into a teen’s brain it melds into that wiring and sticks.’

The BBFC said it had received a small number of complaints from people who have seen the film.

The Hunger Games, which stars Jennifer Lawrence, Woody Harrelson and Donald Sutherland, has grossed £5million in the UK in its opening weekend, twice as much as the opening instalment of another teen favourite, the Twilight Saga.

Post: #37

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Easy to tell who is too stupid to understand the spiritual warfare that goes on around us every day wand who isn't...

Your either blind, a shill, or complicit in the satanic agenda if you think this stuff is a joke.

Ahriman, your one dimensional thinking makes it very easy to tell how unable you are to discern things from a spiritual standpoint. Yes, Lucifer does mean light bearer. He is also a real fallen angel that the kings of this world bow down to and worship. You can whine all you want and whip out your dictionary to try to school everyone, but until you have experienced the spirit realm or been to on of the ritual gatherings that freemasons have where they conjure up demons, I suggest you stop spreading your trite definitions. Satan is called "the king of THIS world" for a reason. He gives human leaders the power they weild over the rest of us through black magic and sorcery, so he can work towards his goal of making gods creation worship him, instead of the prince of peace, the king of kings, Jesus Christ. Wise up.

I hate to spam threads repeating myself but here ya go:

We have a higher self and a lower self. Some people tend toward their higher self and some are attracted by the material universe we are in. If you are attracted to your lower nature and live in the world, by the world, then you will recieved the rewards in which you seek. If you are attracted by a higher nature, then your reward remains 'unseen' in this material world.

That does not mean the sun is actually Jesus and that does not mean Saturn is actually Satan. We are made in the image of God and like us God has two hands, one for holding and one for bitchslapping. All the powers of positive and negative emanate from God through his creation. When you 'worship' the Jesus 'positive' part you are only worshiping half of the deity you call God.

I don't think the great unnameable would appreciate being half worshiped, do you? Seriously. He does not want you to worship his right hand at the expensive of his left. What if God is a lefty?

No wonder you are all lopsided. God worshipers and satanists alike.

-----------


To continue with one more very important point, who was created higher than the angels? Answer me that. Until You realize You have the power over these 'beings' these 'beings' have You in their grip.

One more thing, about schooling, if you don't know the rudiments how can you understand the higher forms? You can't because your base is off. If you start from a faulty position you are just adding insult to error.

Post: #38

Ahriman  Wrote:

That does not mean the sun is actually Jesus and that does not mean Saturn is actually Satan. We are made in the image of God and like us God has two hands, one for holding and one for bitchslapping. All the powers of positive and negative emanate from God through his creation. When you 'worship' the Jesus 'positive' part you are only worshiping half of the deity you call God.

Jesus is no part of, nor is in any way associated, with the crimes being committed by Luciferians world wide.

If you don't know about the child abuse and ritualistic programming, have a read.

A lot of it is perpetrated by people who claim to be of a specific faith.

Have a good day.

Post: #39

Simple analogy. Electricity works how? Roughly the positive is grounded with the negative to create power. Vastly underexplained but that's the principal.

You do realize these 'satanists' as you call them use positive and negative right? This is how it works people.

All your fabled 'black magic'

Post: #40

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Ahriman  Wrote:

That does not mean the sun is actually Jesus and that does not mean Saturn is actually Satan. We are made in the image of God and like us God has two hands, one for holding and one for bitchslapping. All the powers of positive and negative emanate from God through his creation. When you 'worship' the Jesus 'positive' part you are only worshiping half of the deity you call God.

Jesus is no part of, nor is in any way associated, with the crimes being committed by Luciferians world wide.

If you don't know about the child abuse and ritualistic programming, have a read.

A lot of it is perpetrated by people who claim to be of a specific faith.

Have a good day.

Of course he isn't. He's a story device. A fiction. A symbolic story of the normal human spirit, who has been hexed by carbon and crucified by life.

Post: #41

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Easy to tell who is too stupid to understand the spiritual warfare that goes on around us every day wand who isn't...

Your either blind, a shill, or complicit in the satanic agenda if you think this stuff is a joke.

Ahriman, your one dimensional thinking makes it very easy to tell how unable you are to discern things from a spiritual standpoint. Yes, Lucifer does mean light bearer. He is also a real fallen angel that the kings of this world bow down to and worship. You can whine all you want and whip out your dictionary to try to school everyone, but until you have experienced the spirit realm or been to on of the ritual gatherings that freemasons have where they conjure up demons, I suggest you stop spreading your trite definitions. Satan is called "the king of THIS world" for a reason. He gives human leaders the power they weild over the rest of us through black magic and sorcery, so he can work towards his goal of making gods creation worship him, instead of the prince of peace, the king of kings, Jesus Christ. Wise up.

Good post.

Post: #42

Ahriman  Wrote:

Of course he isn't. He's a story device. A fiction. A symbolic story of the normal human spirit, who has been hexed by carbon and crucified by life.

He just doesn't know you.

Post: #43

Ahriman  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Ahriman  Wrote:

That does not mean the sun is actually Jesus and that does not mean Saturn is actually Satan. We are made in the image of God and like us God has two hands, one for holding and one for bitchslapping. All the powers of positive and negative emanate from God through his creation. When you 'worship' the Jesus 'positive' part you are only worshiping half of the deity you call God.

Jesus is no part of, nor is in any way associated, with the crimes being committed by Luciferians world wide.

If you don't know about the child abuse and ritualistic programming, have a read.

A lot of it is perpetrated by people who claim to be of a specific faith.

Have a good day.

Of course he isn't. He's a story device. A fiction. A symbolic story of the normal human spirit, who has been hexed by carbon and crucified by life.

You are only proving how blind you are. I know all about how you new agers believe in "higher and lower" selves,and how you're being led to believe that all of the "characters" of the Bible are just "archetypes". I also know, from personal experience, that it's a load of balogna.

Actually, you're starting to sound a lot like this guy:
http://youtu.be/pIF9gH17d0o

Jesus is not a mythical character. You can keep believing the lies that come down the river from Satan the will quell your inner fear of a righteous and just god, or you can get smart and swim past all of the bullshit, and realize that Jesus was who he said he was, and is the only way. All other paths, like your "higher lower self" crap lead to hell, right where Satan wants you. Go ahead, keep denying that Satan exists, and that Christ exists. At the end of the road you're about to take, you'll be standing before the devil, saying "wait... you're real?" and he'll say "yep, you believed the bull that I passed on down the chain, and now you're here". I hope you wake up before then, but if not... so be it.

Post: #44

Ahriman  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Wow, OP got a lot of sides stirred up. You can tell who is defending the evil agenda here.

Good work.

Know your enemy. He likes to confound you. He is entirely human and wants you to think he or it is satan or lucifer.

I'm giving good information which will help you out of the darkness.

No wonder we are all blind...

LOL What a bunch of crap.

Post: #45

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Ahriman  Wrote:

Of course he isn't. He's a story device. A fiction. A symbolic story of the normal human spirit, who has been hexed by carbon and crucified by life.

He just doesn't know you.

Why would you assume 'he' needs to know me.

Maybe it is better for me to know 'him.'

Now we just need to define what 'he' is.

Jesus sits at 'his' right hand. So who prey tell is sitting at 'his' left?