News
news Massive Worldwide Bee Decline Continues as Pesticide Companies Ramp Up the PR
news Is Your Taste In Music Influenced By The Shape Of Your Skull?
news Obama and His Allies Say the Govt Doesn't Listen to Your Phone Calls — But the FBI Begs to Differ
news Nestle: Water’s Corporate Takeover
news Eyeball Licking Sex Craze Sweeps Japan
news The Supreme Court Decided Your Silence Can Be Used Against You
news Putin: Syrian Rebels Eat Human Flesh
news Accident Rates Rise At Intersections With Speed Cameras
news The "Ocean Moon" --Future Missions to Explore Jupiter's Europa
news Plastic Bags Fool Sea Turtles Into Hunting Them
news Magnetic Pole Shift May Happen Sooner than Expected
news Venezuelans download new app which helps locate TOILET PAPER as stock runs low
news How Do Death Valley’s “Sailing Stones” Move Themselves Across the Desert?
news School Holds Toy Gun Buyback Program
news Meet the Contractors Analyzing Your Private Data
news HILARIOUS: Rand Paul Explains Obamacare
news The Shocking Amount of Wealth and Power Held by 0.001% of the World Population
news 22 Nauseating Quotes From Hypocritical Establishment Politicians About The NSA Spying Scandal
news Recomended: Ship Graveyards from Around the World in Pictures
news Cradle Turns Smartphone Into Handheld Biosensor; ‘Performs as Accurately as a Large $50,000 Spectrophotometer in the Laboratory’

Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 8 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tunguska revisited.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 86377
04-24-2012 06:13 AM

 



Post: #16
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Once I found out the truth I lost all respect for Edison. He was a capitalist, not a scientist.
Quote this message in a reply
Markoff Chaney
lop guest
User ID: 92128
04-24-2012 06:14 AM

 



Post: #17
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Skippy  Wrote:
Some of the best scientists of the day thought it might have been a piece of antimatter entering our atmosphere. When I tried to discuss the topic here, a flood of trolls, shills, whatever bombarded me. That made me even more curious.

Google this: "antimatter comet". Do a Google Books search on it as well....

No offence Skip, but I suspect you are a troll magnet for many reasons, which I shan't enter into here.

I believe I mentioned anti matter as one of the theories. I did not see your post, perhaps you could link it here.

I discount nothing and have no firm stance on any one theory. I am open to listening to all theories, but at the end of the day, I will have my preference as to what the cause may have been, but as with everything in life, I remain a true open minded individual.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 86377
04-24-2012 06:16 AM

 



Post: #18
RE: Tunguska revisited.
This may be the most civil thread in the history of LOP.
Quote this message in a reply
Markoff Chaney
lop guest
User ID: 92128
04-24-2012 06:17 AM

 



Post: #19
RE: Tunguska revisited.
LoP Guest  Wrote:
Once I found out the truth I lost all respect for Edison. He was a capitalist, not a scientist.

Ah, grasshopper, but what is truth?

Yes, it appears that Edison was capital driven, but was he really? Who wrote the history books about Edison? Himself? And even if he did, would that be truth?

Truth is a very slippery subject. I certainly am not the possessor of truth!
Quote this message in a reply
Skippy
It's a pickle...
User ID: 92197
04-24-2012 06:19 AM

Posts: 12,500



Post: #20
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
Skippy  Wrote:
Some of the best scientists of the day thought it might have been a piece of antimatter entering our atmosphere. When I tried to discuss the topic here, a flood of trolls, shills, whatever bombarded me. That made me even more curious.

Google this: "antimatter comet". Do a Google Books search on it as well....

No offence Skip, but I suspect you are a troll magnet for many reasons, which I shan't enter into here.

I believe I mentioned anti matter as one of the theories. I did not see your post, perhaps you could link it here.

I discount nothing and have no firm stance on any one theory. I am open to listening to all theories, but at the end of the day, I will have my preference as to what the cause may have been, but as with everything in life, I remain a true open minded individual.

http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-I-Found-...ets?page=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQFzLO--2R0 <== The Cause

[Image: 23tilup.png]
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 86377
04-24-2012 06:21 AM

 



Post: #21
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
LoP Guest  Wrote:
Once I found out the truth I lost all respect for Edison. He was a capitalist, not a scientist.

Ah, grasshopper, but what is truth?

Yes, it appears that Edison was capital driven, but was he really? Who wrote the history books about Edison? Himself? And even if he did, would that be truth?

Truth is a very slippery subject. I certainly am not the possessor of truth!

What I THINK is the truth is that he would have been put out of business by Tesla with his far more efficient AC system. Edison relied on huge inefficient powerplants and DC. He would have been crushed by Tesla......but Edison was the better businessman.

Lets not derail the thread.

What do you think caused the burns?
Quote this message in a reply
BJ
lop guest
User ID: 92230
04-24-2012 06:21 AM

 



Post: #22
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Would a Tesla event have caused this? I don't think even the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima had such far-reaching affects!

<snips>
The first reports of a strange glow in the sky came from across Europe. Shortly after midnight on 1 July 1908, Londoners were intrigued to see a pink phosphorescent night sky over the capital. People who had retired awoke confused as the strange pink glow shone into their bedrooms. The same ruddy luminescence was reported over Belgium. The skies over Germany were curiously said to be bright green, while the heavens over Scotland were of an incredible intense whiteness which tricked the wildlife into believing it was dawn. Birdsong started and cocks crowed - at two o'clock in the morning. ...

A captain on a ship on the River Volga said he could see vessels on the river two miles away by the uncanny astral light. One golf game in England almost went on until four in the morning under the nocturnal glow...

http://www.qsl.net/w5www/tunguska.html
Quote this message in a reply
Markoff Chaney
lop guest
User ID: 92128
04-24-2012 06:21 AM

 



Post: #23
RE: Tunguska revisited.
LoP Guest  Wrote:
This may be the most civil thread in the history of LOP.

Methinks you exaggerate, but it certainly is a truly civil thread and may all the gods be praised for that!

Why dost thou think this thread has remained so civil?

I have no clue, but thank Thor that it is! chuckle

Of course I don't believe in the god of thunder, but who better to be the patron god of this thread?
Quote this message in a reply
entropy
Registered User
User ID: 90042
04-24-2012 06:22 AM

Posts: 22,594



Post: #24
RE: Tunguska revisited.
The energy released at the time of the event does not do justice to the theories most taken. It was something more. The jury's out.
Quote this message in a reply
birdie
Registered User
User ID: 14733
04-24-2012 06:25 AM

Posts: 2,460



Post: #25
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
The story has long fascinated me and I won't bore you by repeating the details as I'm sure you're all familiar with the event of June 1908.

But what was it?

There have been various theories as to the cause, from a comet exploding in the atmosphere to a meteor or asteroid impact to a Tesla weapon to a UFo. Perhaps we'll never know.

It is even hypothesized that Lake Cheko, situated 7 km )approx 4 miles) from the epicentre, was created by a fragment of whatever caused the massive explosion.

Lake Cheko (Russian: Чеко) is a small freshwater lake in Siberia, near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River, in what is now the Evenkiysky District of the Krasnoyarsk Krai. It is a small bowl shaped lake, 708 m long, 364 m wide and about 50 m deep.

Scientists have speculated that Lake Cheko was created during the Tunguska event, an explosion on 30 June 1908 that destroyed more than 2,000 km2 (800 sq mi) of Siberian taiga. It is suggested that the lake, which lies approximately 8 kilometres north-north-west of the event hypocenter, was formed by a fragment which struck the ground. [1] A 1961 investigation estimated the age of the lake to be at least 5000 years, based on meters-thick silt deposits on the lake bed;[2] newer research suggests that only a meter or so of the sediment layer on the lake bed is "normal lacustrine sedimentation", indicating a much younger lake of about 100 years.[3]

Acoustic-echo soundings of the lake floor provide further support for the hypothesis, revealing a conical shape for the lake bed, which is consistent with an impact crater. Also, the lake's long axis points to the epicenter of the Tunguska explosion, about 7.0 km away.[4] Magnetic readings also indicate a possible meter-sized chunk of rock below the lake's deepest point, which may be a fragment of the colliding body.[4] However, researchers at Imperial College London, point out that many of the trees surrounding the lake are older than 100 years, which suggests that the lake could not have been created by an impact in 1908.[5]
Researchers from the University of Bologna investigated the lake bed in 2009.[6][7] Studies of sediments, isotopes and pollen, in their opinion, "suggest that Lake Cheko formed at the time of the Tunguska Event."
Quote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Cheko

But I suspect we'll never know the true cause of this major event, whereby newspapers could be read at midnight without the aid of artificial light as far away as London and where the shockwave is said to have circled the globe twice.

What we do know is that the explosion knocked over an estimated 80 million trees covering 2,150 square kilometres (830 sq mi) and is estimated that the shock wave from the blast would have measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.

A picture taken 13 years after the event
[Image: 7226_4F961737.jpg]

Interestingly Sibir newspaper, July 2, 1908[18], described these witness accounts aof an event almost 2 weeks before the Tungunska event itself.

On the 17th of June, around 9 a.m. in the morning, we observed an unusual natural occurrence. In the north Karelinski village [200 verst, or about 130 miles, north of Kirensk] the peasants saw to the north west, rather high above the horizon, some strangely bright (impossible to look at) bluish-white heavenly body, which for 10 minutes moved downwards. The body appeared as a "pipe", i.e. a cylinder. The sky was cloudless, only a small dark cloud was observed in the general direction of the bright body. It was hot and dry. As the body neared the ground (forest), the bright body seemed to smudge, and then turned into a giant billow of black smoke, and a loud knocking (not thunder) was heard, as if large stones were falling, or artillery was fired. All buildings shook. At the same time the cloud began emitting flames of uncertain shapes. All villagers were stricken with panic and took to the streets, women cried, thinking it was the end of the world. The author of these lines was meantime in the forest about 6 verst (about four miles) north of Kirensk, and heard to the north east some kind of artillery barrage, that repeated in intervals of 15 minutes at least 10 times. In Kirensk in a few buildings in the walls facing north east window glass shook.



Here's a doco on the event to while away some time

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXfvhJoNi90
[/quote]

I don't believe for a minute that it was formed by an incoming exploding meteor.

You know what I think it was?

I think it was a volcanic explosion.

People locally reported seeing a fireball and a bright light.

Volcanoes also have the power to blow down trees (Mt. St. Helens, anyone?) and to create lakes.

That's what I think it was.

AND the "sound of large stones falling..."? Enough said.

Case closed.
(This post was last modified: 04-24-2012 06:27 AM by birdie.) Quote this message in a reply
Markoff Chaney
lop guest
User ID: 92128
04-24-2012 06:25 AM

 



Post: #26
RE: Tunguska revisited.
LoP Guest  Wrote:
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
LoP Guest  Wrote:
Once I found out the truth I lost all respect for Edison. He was a capitalist, not a scientist.

Ah, grasshopper, but what is truth?

Yes, it appears that Edison was capital driven, but was he really? Who wrote the history books about Edison? Himself? And even if he did, would that be truth?

Truth is a very slippery subject. I certainly am not the possessor of truth!

What I THINK is the truth is that he would have been put out of business by Tesla with his far more efficient AC system. Edison relied on huge inefficient powerplants and DC. He would have been crushed by Tesla......but Edison was the better businessman.

Lets not derail the thread.

What do you think caused the burns?

The only thing that springs to mind as a cause for the burns would be radiation, but that then begs other questions, which I simply cannot answer, or only merely speculate as to how that could occur and one man's speculation is no better than another's.

Could you think of another or other causes?
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 86377
04-24-2012 06:25 AM

 



Post: #27
RE: Tunguska revisited.
BJ  Wrote:
Would a Tesla event have caused this? I don't think even the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima had such far-reaching affects!

<snips>
The first reports of a strange glow in the sky came from across Europe. Shortly after midnight on 1 July 1908, Londoners were intrigued to see a pink phosphorescent night sky over the capital. People who had retired awoke confused as the strange pink glow shone into their bedrooms. The same ruddy luminescence was reported over Belgium. The skies over Germany were curiously said to be bright green, while the heavens over Scotland were of an incredible intense whiteness which tricked the wildlife into believing it was dawn. Birdsong started and cocks crowed - at two o'clock in the morning. ...

A captain on a ship on the River Volga said he could see vessels on the river two miles away by the uncanny astral light. One golf game in England almost went on until four in the morning under the nocturnal glow...

http://www.qsl.net/w5www/tunguska.html

Good question...I don't know about the glow, but could an EM weapon of this scale which bounces off of the atmosphere produce an effect similar to an aurora?

I have no idea, but we have never seen what our EM weapons are capable of.

Tesla was known in the area for making thunder like noises and the earth shake 15 miles from his lab. The next time someone posts about "noises" consider this.

We are kept in the dark about so much. We are kept guessing.
Quote this message in a reply
Skippy
It's a pickle...
User ID: 92197
04-24-2012 06:26 AM

Posts: 12,500



Post: #28
RE: Tunguska revisited.
birdie  Wrote:
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
The story has long fascinated me and I won't bore you by repeating the details as I'm sure you're all familiar with the event of June 1908.

But what was it?

There have been various theories as to the cause, from a comet exploding in the atmosphere to a meteor or asteroid impact to a Tesla weapon to a UFo. Perhaps we'll never know.

It is even hypothesized that Lake Cheko, situated 7 km )approx 4 miles) from the epicentre, was created by a fragment of whatever caused the massive explosion.

Lake Cheko (Russian: Чеко) is a small freshwater lake in Siberia, near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River, in what is now the Evenkiysky District of the Krasnoyarsk Krai. It is a small bowl shaped lake, 708 m long, 364 m wide and about 50 m deep.

Scientists have speculated that Lake Cheko was created during the Tunguska event, an explosion on 30 June 1908 that destroyed more than 2,000 km2 (800 sq mi) of Siberian taiga. It is suggested that the lake, which lies approximately 8 kilometres north-north-west of the event hypocenter, was formed by a fragment which struck the ground. [1] A 1961 investigation estimated the age of the lake to be at least 5000 years, based on meters-thick silt deposits on the lake bed;[2] newer research suggests that only a meter or so of the sediment layer on the lake bed is "normal lacustrine sedimentation", indicating a much younger lake of about 100 years.[3]

Acoustic-echo soundings of the lake floor provide further support for the hypothesis, revealing a conical shape for the lake bed, which is consistent with an impact crater. Also, the lake's long axis points to the epicenter of the Tunguska explosion, about 7.0 km away.[4] Magnetic readings also indicate a possible meter-sized chunk of rock below the lake's deepest point, which may be a fragment of the colliding body.[4] However, researchers at Imperial College London, point out that many of the trees surrounding the lake are older than 100 years, which suggests that the lake could not have been created by an impact in 1908.[5]
Researchers from the University of Bologna investigated the lake bed in 2009.[6][7] Studies of sediments, isotopes and pollen, in their opinion, "suggest that Lake Cheko formed at the time of the Tunguska Event."
Quote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Cheko

But I suspect we'll never know the true cause of this major event, whereby newspapers could be read at midnight without the aid of artificial light as far away as London and where the shockwave is said to have circled the globe twice.

What we do know is that the explosion knocked over an estimated 80 million trees covering 2,150 square kilometres (830 sq mi) and is estimated that the shock wave from the blast would have measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.

A picture taken 13 years after the event
[Image: 7226_4F961737.jpg]

Interestingly Sibir newspaper, July 2, 1908[18], described these witness accounts aof an event almost 2 weeks before the Tungunska event itself.

On the 17th of June, around 9 a.m. in the morning, we observed an unusual natural occurrence. In the north Karelinski village [200 verst, or about 130 miles, north of Kirensk] the peasants saw to the north west, rather high above the horizon, some strangely bright (impossible to look at) bluish-white heavenly body, which for 10 minutes moved downwards. The body appeared as a "pipe", i.e. a cylinder. The sky was cloudless, only a small dark cloud was observed in the general direction of the bright body. It was hot and dry. As the body neared the ground (forest), the bright body seemed to smudge, and then turned into a giant billow of black smoke, and a loud knocking (not thunder) was heard, as if large stones were falling, or artillery was fired. All buildings shook. At the same time the cloud began emitting flames of uncertain shapes. All villagers were stricken with panic and took to the streets, women cried, thinking it was the end of the world. The author of these lines was meantime in the forest about 6 verst (about four miles) north of Kirensk, and heard to the north east some kind of artillery barrage, that repeated in intervals of 15 minutes at least 10 times. In Kirensk in a few buildings in the walls facing north east window glass shook.



Here's a doco on the event to while away some time

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXfvhJoNi90

I don't believe for a minute that it was formed by an incoming exploding meteor.

You know what I think it was?

I think it was a volcanic explosion.

People locally reported seeing a fireball and a bright light.

Volcanoes also have the power to blow down trees (Mt. St. Helens, anyone?) and to create lakes.

That's what I think it was.
[/quote]

What the f*ck? Stick to making babies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQFzLO--2R0 <== The Cause

[Image: 23tilup.png]
Quote this message in a reply
Markoff Chaney
lop guest
User ID: 92128
04-24-2012 06:27 AM

 



Post: #29
RE: Tunguska revisited.
birdie  Wrote:
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
The story has long fascinated me and I won't bore you by repeating the details as I'm sure you're all familiar with the event of June 1908.

But what was it?

There have been various theories as to the cause, from a comet exploding in the atmosphere to a meteor or asteroid impact to a Tesla weapon to a UFo. Perhaps we'll never know.

It is even hypothesized that Lake Cheko, situated 7 km )approx 4 miles) from the epicentre, was created by a fragment of whatever caused the massive explosion.

Lake Cheko (Russian: Чеко) is a small freshwater lake in Siberia, near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River, in what is now the Evenkiysky District of the Krasnoyarsk Krai. It is a small bowl shaped lake, 708 m long, 364 m wide and about 50 m deep.

Scientists have speculated that Lake Cheko was created during the Tunguska event, an explosion on 30 June 1908 that destroyed more than 2,000 km2 (800 sq mi) of Siberian taiga. It is suggested that the lake, which lies approximately 8 kilometres north-north-west of the event hypocenter, was formed by a fragment which struck the ground. [1] A 1961 investigation estimated the age of the lake to be at least 5000 years, based on meters-thick silt deposits on the lake bed;[2] newer research suggests that only a meter or so of the sediment layer on the lake bed is "normal lacustrine sedimentation", indicating a much younger lake of about 100 years.[3]

Acoustic-echo soundings of the lake floor provide further support for the hypothesis, revealing a conical shape for the lake bed, which is consistent with an impact crater. Also, the lake's long axis points to the epicenter of the Tunguska explosion, about 7.0 km away.[4] Magnetic readings also indicate a possible meter-sized chunk of rock below the lake's deepest point, which may be a fragment of the colliding body.[4] However, researchers at Imperial College London, point out that many of the trees surrounding the lake are older than 100 years, which suggests that the lake could not have been created by an impact in 1908.[5]
Researchers from the University of Bologna investigated the lake bed in 2009.[6][7] Studies of sediments, isotopes and pollen, in their opinion, "suggest that Lake Cheko formed at the time of the Tunguska Event."
Quote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Cheko

But I suspect we'll never know the true cause of this major event, whereby newspapers could be read at midnight without the aid of artificial light as far away as London and where the shockwave is said to have circled the globe twice.

What we do know is that the explosion knocked over an estimated 80 million trees covering 2,150 square kilometres (830 sq mi) and is estimated that the shock wave from the blast would have measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.

A picture taken 13 years after the event
[Image: 7226_4F961737.jpg]

Interestingly Sibir newspaper, July 2, 1908[18], described these witness accounts aof an event almost 2 weeks before the Tungunska event itself.

On the 17th of June, around 9 a.m. in the morning, we observed an unusual natural occurrence. In the north Karelinski village [200 verst, or about 130 miles, north of Kirensk] the peasants saw to the north west, rather high above the horizon, some strangely bright (impossible to look at) bluish-white heavenly body, which for 10 minutes moved downwards. The body appeared as a "pipe", i.e. a cylinder. The sky was cloudless, only a small dark cloud was observed in the general direction of the bright body. It was hot and dry. As the body neared the ground (forest), the bright body seemed to smudge, and then turned into a giant billow of black smoke, and a loud knocking (not thunder) was heard, as if large stones were falling, or artillery was fired. All buildings shook. At the same time the cloud began emitting flames of uncertain shapes. All villagers were stricken with panic and took to the streets, women cried, thinking it was the end of the world. The author of these lines was meantime in the forest about 6 verst (about four miles) north of Kirensk, and heard to the north east some kind of artillery barrage, that repeated in intervals of 15 minutes at least 10 times. In Kirensk in a few buildings in the walls facing north east window glass shook.



Here's a doco on the event to while away some time

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXfvhJoNi90

I don't believe for a minute that it was formed by an incoming exploding meteor.

You know what I think it was?

I think it was a volcanic explosion.

People locally reported seeing a fireball and a bright light.

Volcanoes also have the power to blow down trees (Mt. St. Helens, anyone?) and to create lakes.

That's what I think it was.
[/quote]

That is one theory I have not heard before and I suspect the reason for this is that there is no evidence for a volcanic event in the reason. As far as I know, there are no volcanoes in the immediate region. However, I could be wrong and will certainly look into this possibility.
Quote this message in a reply
birdie
Registered User
User ID: 14733
04-24-2012 06:28 AM

Posts: 2,460



Post: #30
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Skippy  Wrote:
What the f*ck? Stick to making babies.

You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.
Quote this message in a reply



Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1