Yes, it appears that Edison was capital driven, but was he really? Who wrote the history books about Edison? Himself? And even if he did, would that be truth?
Truth is a very slippery subject. I certainly am not the possessor of truth!
What I THINK is the truth is that he would have been put out of business by Tesla with his far more efficient AC system. Edison relied on huge inefficient powerplants and DC. He would have been crushed by Tesla......but Edison was the better businessman.
Lets not derail the thread.
What do you think caused the burns?
The only thing that springs to mind as a cause for the burns would be radiation, but that then begs other questions, which I simply cannot answer, or only merely speculate as to how that could occur and one man's speculation is no better than another's.
Could you think of another or other causes?
I've read on this for years and I've never gotten anywhere...
This is one I believe will remain a mystery.
entropy Registered User User ID: 90042 04-24-2012 06:29 AM
Posts: 21,501
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.
Um...we have an epicenter. No volcano. Good theory though based on limited interpretation of evidence but not quite complete. Plus there's an absence of geological effects associated with volcanoes, shakes and stuff.
RIP Karen AKA SweetJane
(This post was last modified: 04-24-2012 06:30 AM by entropy.)
Markoff Chaney lop guest User ID: 92128 04-24-2012 06:30 AM
The story has long fascinated me and I won't bore you by repeating the details as I'm sure you're all familiar with the event of June 1908.
But what was it?
There have been various theories as to the cause, from a comet exploding in the atmosphere to a meteor or asteroid impact to a Tesla weapon to a UFo. Perhaps we'll never know.
It is even hypothesized that Lake Cheko, situated 7 km )approx 4 miles) from the epicentre, was created by a fragment of whatever caused the massive explosion.
Lake Cheko (Russian: Чеко) is a small freshwater lake in Siberia, near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River, in what is now the Evenkiysky District of the Krasnoyarsk Krai. It is a small bowl shaped lake, 708 m long, 364 m wide and about 50 m deep.
Scientists have speculated that Lake Cheko was created during the Tunguska event, an explosion on 30 June 1908 that destroyed more than 2,000 km2 (800 sq mi) of Siberian taiga. It is suggested that the lake, which lies approximately 8 kilometres north-north-west of the event hypocenter, was formed by a fragment which struck the ground. [1] A 1961 investigation estimated the age of the lake to be at least 5000 years, based on meters-thick silt deposits on the lake bed;[2] newer research suggests that only a meter or so of the sediment layer on the lake bed is "normal lacustrine sedimentation", indicating a much younger lake of about 100 years.[3]
Acoustic-echo soundings of the lake floor provide further support for the hypothesis, revealing a conical shape for the lake bed, which is consistent with an impact crater. Also, the lake's long axis points to the epicenter of the Tunguska explosion, about 7.0 km away.[4] Magnetic readings also indicate a possible meter-sized chunk of rock below the lake's deepest point, which may be a fragment of the colliding body.[4] However, researchers at Imperial College London, point out that many of the trees surrounding the lake are older than 100 years, which suggests that the lake could not have been created by an impact in 1908.[5]
Researchers from the University of Bologna investigated the lake bed in 2009.[6][7] Studies of sediments, isotopes and pollen, in their opinion, "suggest that Lake Cheko formed at the time of the Tunguska Event."
But I suspect we'll never know the true cause of this major event, whereby newspapers could be read at midnight without the aid of artificial light as far away as London and where the shockwave is said to have circled the globe twice.
What we do know is that the explosion knocked over an estimated 80 million trees covering 2,150 square kilometres (830 sq mi) and is estimated that the shock wave from the blast would have measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.
A picture taken 13 years after the event
Interestingly Sibir newspaper, July 2, 1908[18], described these witness accounts aof an event almost 2 weeks before the Tungunska event itself.
On the 17th of June, around 9 a.m. in the morning, we observed an unusual natural occurrence. In the north Karelinski village [200 verst, or about 130 miles, north of Kirensk] the peasants saw to the north west, rather high above the horizon, some strangely bright (impossible to look at) bluish-white heavenly body, which for 10 minutes moved downwards. The body appeared as a "pipe", i.e. a cylinder. The sky was cloudless, only a small dark cloud was observed in the general direction of the bright body. It was hot and dry. As the body neared the ground (forest), the bright body seemed to smudge, and then turned into a giant billow of black smoke, and a loud knocking (not thunder) was heard, as if large stones were falling, or artillery was fired. All buildings shook. At the same time the cloud began emitting flames of uncertain shapes. All villagers were stricken with panic and took to the streets, women cried, thinking it was the end of the world. The author of these lines was meantime in the forest about 6 verst (about four miles) north of Kirensk, and heard to the north east some kind of artillery barrage, that repeated in intervals of 15 minutes at least 10 times. In Kirensk in a few buildings in the walls facing north east window glass shook.
Here's a doco on the event to while away some time
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.
The one thing I know about volcanoes is that they don't disappear in a 100 year timeframe. If the Tunguska event was created by a volcanic eruption... there would be a volcano there in the center of it....
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.
The one thing I know about volcanoes is that they don't disappear in a 100 year timeframe. If the Tunguska event was created by a volcanic eruption... there would be a volcano there in the center of it....
Nope.
Ever driven across AZ or NM?
There's calderas everywhere.
ANd it's all flat where they are, for the most part. It doesn't "look" like a volcano, but it's there.
Markoff Chaney lop guest User ID: 92128 04-24-2012 06:33 AM
What is that showing??? If there was a volcanic crater in the center of Tunguska, it wouldn't be a mystery. There is no evidence whatsoever that it was volcanic in nature.
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.
Um...we have an epicenter. No volcano. Good theory though based on limited interpretation of evidence but not quite complete. Plus there's an absence of geological effects associated with volcanoes, shakes and stuff.
Did you read the peasants description upthread?
There were tremors every 15 minutes.
And there was a HUGE cloud of smoke adrift in the sky.
Sounds just like a volcanic eruption.
Skippy It's a pickle... User ID: 92197 04-24-2012 06:36 AM
Posts: 12,387
What is that showing??? If there was a volcanic crater in the center of Tunguska, it wouldn't be a mystery. There is no evidence whatsoever that it was volcanic in nature.
As you can see from the two maps, you have FOUR volcanoes just due south of the Tungunska event. And then a few more a little to the east, that are even closer.
Markoff Chaney lop guest User ID: 92128 04-24-2012 06:41 AM
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.
Hi Birdie, I make the same request that I made of Skippy, could you please keep it civil?
We do not need to give like for like, no matter how strongly our buttons are pushed!
She is making no valid argument whatsoever. If she did some research and had some backing sources I would concede.... but give me a break.
You don't have to concede. Birdie made no statements worthy of the abuse you levelled at her and I believe an apology is in order (perhaps in PM mode).
Perhaps you have not understood what she has ´presented or have not taken your mind out of preconcept mode to consider the possibility.
I have seen no evidence to suggest it was volcanic, but does that mean it wasn't? No!
On the contrary, it has given me an avenue for research that I had not previously considered.
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.
Um...we have an epicenter. No volcano. Good theory though based on limited interpretation of evidence but not quite complete. Plus there's an absence of geological effects associated with volcanoes, shakes and stuff.
Did you read the peasants description upthread?
There were tremors every 15 minutes.
And there was a HUGE cloud of smoke adrift in the sky.
Sounds just like a volcanic eruption.
No offense, but I have to go with Skippy on this one. Had it been a volcanic eruption, witnesses and scientific exploration of the site would have confirmed it. No explanation has been found. It remains a mystery.
The Evil AC I am not a number!!! User ID: 666 04-24-2012 06:42 AM
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.
Um...we have an epicenter. No volcano. Good theory though based on limited interpretation of evidence but not quite complete. Plus there's an absence of geological effects associated with volcanoes, shakes and stuff.
Did you read the peasants description upthread?
There were tremors every 15 minutes.
And there was a HUGE cloud of smoke adrift in the sky.
Disclaimer:
This website exists for fun and discussion only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality
or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites,
are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way
representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this
website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific
author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual
information on behalf of the owner or administration of
LunaticOutPost.Com. The owners or administration of this website can't
be hold responsible for content hosted on sites that posters link to
in; including, but not limited to, posts, signatures, private messages and such.
This site may contain content not suitable for minors and if you feel
you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use
of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance
awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights,
economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science
& technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material. The
material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes.
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users
limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant
portions of the article you wish to discuss (no more than 50% of the
source material) provide a link back to the original article and provide
your original comments / criticism in your post with the article. If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and
you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair
Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright please contact [email protected]
Privacy Policy:
This website is owned by :
Marco Zwaneveld
Drijfriemstraat 52
2516 XR The Hague
Netherlands.
I will not rent, sell, share or otherwise disclose your personal information to any third party.
We might contact you from time to time
regarding your purchases or the services (like forums and announcement
lists) you have subscribed to.
Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on lunaticoutpost.com.
Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users
based on their visit to lunaticoutpost.com and other sites on the
Internet.
Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the
Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL -
http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html