News
news George Soros Switches From Physical Gold to Gold Stocks and That is Very Bullish for Gold Prices
news Four fireballs fall over U.S. in 24 hour period
news Russians drive over North Pole to Canada
news Concentrated Fukushima radioactive plume staying on narrow path toward U.S.
news How to Use Chinese Condiments
news Google’s Plan To Take Over The World
news 'Dead' man comes back to life at his funeral
news Visualizing The Silver Squeeze
news Geothermal Energy
news N.A Poe, Adam Kokesh and Others Arrested at Smokedown Prohibition Cannabis Protest in Philadelphia
news FEMA Plans Clear-Cutting 85,000 Berkeley and Oakland Trees
news Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls The News
news Woman who survived flesh-eating infection, receives bionic hands
news Billionaires Now Own American Politics
news Air Force Chemtrail Whistleblower Exposes Geoengineering
news Yahoo Japan suspects 22 million user IDs leaked: Kyodo
news Ruins of Lost City May Lurk Deep in Honduras Rain Forest
news Dark, massive asteroid to fly by Earth on May 31
news Greek addicts turn to deadly new drug 'sisa'
news How to Share Difficult Information with Friends

Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 8 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tunguska revisited.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 86377
04-24-2012 06:29 AM

 



Post: #31
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
LoP Guest  Wrote:
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
Ah, grasshopper, but what is truth?

Yes, it appears that Edison was capital driven, but was he really? Who wrote the history books about Edison? Himself? And even if he did, would that be truth?

Truth is a very slippery subject. I certainly am not the possessor of truth!

What I THINK is the truth is that he would have been put out of business by Tesla with his far more efficient AC system. Edison relied on huge inefficient powerplants and DC. He would have been crushed by Tesla......but Edison was the better businessman.

Lets not derail the thread.

What do you think caused the burns?

The only thing that springs to mind as a cause for the burns would be radiation, but that then begs other questions, which I simply cannot answer, or only merely speculate as to how that could occur and one man's speculation is no better than another's.

Could you think of another or other causes?

I've read on this for years and I've never gotten anywhere...

This is one I believe will remain a mystery.
Quote this message in a reply
entropy
Registered User
User ID: 90042
04-24-2012 06:29 AM

Posts: 21,505



Post: #32
RE: Tunguska revisited.
birdie  Wrote:
Skippy  Wrote:
What the f*ck? Stick to making babies.

You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.

Um...we have an epicenter. No volcano. Good theory though based on limited interpretation of evidence but not quite complete. Plus there's an absence of geological effects associated with volcanoes, shakes and stuff.

Candle RIP Karen AKA SweetJane
(This post was last modified: 04-24-2012 06:30 AM by entropy.) Quote this message in a reply
Markoff Chaney
lop guest
User ID: 92128
04-24-2012 06:30 AM

 



Post: #33
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Skippy  Wrote:
birdie  Wrote:
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
The story has long fascinated me and I won't bore you by repeating the details as I'm sure you're all familiar with the event of June 1908.

But what was it?

There have been various theories as to the cause, from a comet exploding in the atmosphere to a meteor or asteroid impact to a Tesla weapon to a UFo. Perhaps we'll never know.

It is even hypothesized that Lake Cheko, situated 7 km )approx 4 miles) from the epicentre, was created by a fragment of whatever caused the massive explosion.

Lake Cheko (Russian: Чеко) is a small freshwater lake in Siberia, near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River, in what is now the Evenkiysky District of the Krasnoyarsk Krai. It is a small bowl shaped lake, 708 m long, 364 m wide and about 50 m deep.

Scientists have speculated that Lake Cheko was created during the Tunguska event, an explosion on 30 June 1908 that destroyed more than 2,000 km2 (800 sq mi) of Siberian taiga. It is suggested that the lake, which lies approximately 8 kilometres north-north-west of the event hypocenter, was formed by a fragment which struck the ground. [1] A 1961 investigation estimated the age of the lake to be at least 5000 years, based on meters-thick silt deposits on the lake bed;[2] newer research suggests that only a meter or so of the sediment layer on the lake bed is "normal lacustrine sedimentation", indicating a much younger lake of about 100 years.[3]

Acoustic-echo soundings of the lake floor provide further support for the hypothesis, revealing a conical shape for the lake bed, which is consistent with an impact crater. Also, the lake's long axis points to the epicenter of the Tunguska explosion, about 7.0 km away.[4] Magnetic readings also indicate a possible meter-sized chunk of rock below the lake's deepest point, which may be a fragment of the colliding body.[4] However, researchers at Imperial College London, point out that many of the trees surrounding the lake are older than 100 years, which suggests that the lake could not have been created by an impact in 1908.[5]
Researchers from the University of Bologna investigated the lake bed in 2009.[6][7] Studies of sediments, isotopes and pollen, in their opinion, "suggest that Lake Cheko formed at the time of the Tunguska Event."
Quote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Cheko

But I suspect we'll never know the true cause of this major event, whereby newspapers could be read at midnight without the aid of artificial light as far away as London and where the shockwave is said to have circled the globe twice.

What we do know is that the explosion knocked over an estimated 80 million trees covering 2,150 square kilometres (830 sq mi) and is estimated that the shock wave from the blast would have measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.

A picture taken 13 years after the event
[Image: 7226_4F961737.jpg]

Interestingly Sibir newspaper, July 2, 1908[18], described these witness accounts aof an event almost 2 weeks before the Tungunska event itself.

On the 17th of June, around 9 a.m. in the morning, we observed an unusual natural occurrence. In the north Karelinski village [200 verst, or about 130 miles, north of Kirensk] the peasants saw to the north west, rather high above the horizon, some strangely bright (impossible to look at) bluish-white heavenly body, which for 10 minutes moved downwards. The body appeared as a "pipe", i.e. a cylinder. The sky was cloudless, only a small dark cloud was observed in the general direction of the bright body. It was hot and dry. As the body neared the ground (forest), the bright body seemed to smudge, and then turned into a giant billow of black smoke, and a loud knocking (not thunder) was heard, as if large stones were falling, or artillery was fired. All buildings shook. At the same time the cloud began emitting flames of uncertain shapes. All villagers were stricken with panic and took to the streets, women cried, thinking it was the end of the world. The author of these lines was meantime in the forest about 6 verst (about four miles) north of Kirensk, and heard to the north east some kind of artillery barrage, that repeated in intervals of 15 minutes at least 10 times. In Kirensk in a few buildings in the walls facing north east window glass shook.



Here's a doco on the event to while away some time

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXfvhJoNi90

I don't believe for a minute that it was formed by an incoming exploding meteor.

You know what I think it was?

I think it was a volcanic explosion.

People locally reported seeing a fireball and a bright light.

Volcanoes also have the power to blow down trees (Mt. St. Helens, anyone?) and to create lakes.

That's what I think it was.


[/quote]
Quote this message in a reply
Skippy
It's a pickle...
User ID: 92197
04-24-2012 06:31 AM

Posts: 12,387



Post: #34
RE: Tunguska revisited.
birdie  Wrote:
Skippy  Wrote:
What the f*ck? Stick to making babies.

You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.

The one thing I know about volcanoes is that they don't disappear in a 100 year timeframe. If the Tunguska event was created by a volcanic eruption... there would be a volcano there in the center of it....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQFzLO--2R0 <== The Cause

[Image: 23tilup.png]
Quote this message in a reply
birdie
Registered User
User ID: 14733
04-24-2012 06:31 AM

Posts: 2,440



Post: #35
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Quote this message in a reply
birdie
Registered User
User ID: 14733
04-24-2012 06:32 AM

Posts: 2,440



Post: #36
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Skippy  Wrote:
birdie  Wrote:
Skippy  Wrote:
What the f*ck? Stick to making babies.

You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.

The one thing I know about volcanoes is that they don't disappear in a 100 year timeframe. If the Tunguska event was created by a volcanic eruption... there would be a volcano there in the center of it....

Nope.

Ever driven across AZ or NM?

There's calderas everywhere.

ANd it's all flat where they are, for the most part. It doesn't "look" like a volcano, but it's there.
Quote this message in a reply
Markoff Chaney
lop guest
User ID: 92128
04-24-2012 06:33 AM

 



Post: #37
RE: Tunguska revisited.
birdie  Wrote:
Skippy  Wrote:
What the f*ck? Stick to making babies.

You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.

Hi Birdie, I make the same request that I made of Skippy, could you please keep it civil?

We do not need to give like for like, no matter how strongly our buttons are pushed!
Quote this message in a reply
Skippy
It's a pickle...
User ID: 92197
04-24-2012 06:34 AM

Posts: 12,387



Post: #38
RE: Tunguska revisited.
birdie  Wrote:
map

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/co...nguska.png

What is that showing??? If there was a volcanic crater in the center of Tunguska, it wouldn't be a mystery. There is no evidence whatsoever that it was volcanic in nature.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQFzLO--2R0 <== The Cause

[Image: 23tilup.png]
Quote this message in a reply
birdie
Registered User
User ID: 14733
04-24-2012 06:35 AM

Posts: 2,440



Post: #39
RE: Tunguska revisited.
encephaloid  Wrote:
birdie  Wrote:
Skippy  Wrote:
What the f*ck? Stick to making babies.

You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.

Um...we have an epicenter. No volcano. Good theory though based on limited interpretation of evidence but not quite complete. Plus there's an absence of geological effects associated with volcanoes, shakes and stuff.

Did you read the peasants description upthread?

There were tremors every 15 minutes.

And there was a HUGE cloud of smoke adrift in the sky.

Sounds just like a volcanic eruption.
Quote this message in a reply
Skippy
It's a pickle...
User ID: 92197
04-24-2012 06:36 AM

Posts: 12,387



Post: #40
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
birdie  Wrote:
Skippy  Wrote:
What the f*ck? Stick to making babies.

You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.

Hi Birdie, I make the same request that I made of Skippy, could you please keep it civil?

We do not need to give like for like, no matter how strongly our buttons are pushed!

She is making no valid argument whatsoever. If she did some research and had some backing sources I would concede.... but give me a break.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQFzLO--2R0 <== The Cause

[Image: 23tilup.png]
Quote this message in a reply
birdie
Registered User
User ID: 14733
04-24-2012 06:38 AM

Posts: 2,440



Post: #41
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Skippy  Wrote:
birdie  Wrote:
map

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/co...nguska.png

What is that showing??? If there was a volcanic crater in the center of Tunguska, it wouldn't be a mystery. There is no evidence whatsoever that it was volcanic in nature.

Patience, grasshopper.

Now, overlay these two maps, eh?

http://volcano.si.edu/world/region.cfm?rnum=10
Quote this message in a reply
birdie
Registered User
User ID: 14733
04-24-2012 06:41 AM

Posts: 2,440



Post: #42
RE: Tunguska revisited.
As you can see from the two maps, you have FOUR volcanoes just due south of the Tungunska event. And then a few more a little to the east, that are even closer.
Quote this message in a reply
Markoff Chaney
lop guest
User ID: 92128
04-24-2012 06:41 AM

 



Post: #43
RE: Tunguska revisited.
Skippy  Wrote:
Some random internet guy  Wrote:
birdie  Wrote:
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.

Hi Birdie, I make the same request that I made of Skippy, could you please keep it civil?

We do not need to give like for like, no matter how strongly our buttons are pushed!

She is making no valid argument whatsoever. If she did some research and had some backing sources I would concede.... but give me a break.

You don't have to concede. Birdie made no statements worthy of the abuse you levelled at her and I believe an apology is in order (perhaps in PM mode).

Perhaps you have not understood what she has ´presented or have not taken your mind out of preconcept mode to consider the possibility.

I have seen no evidence to suggest it was volcanic, but does that mean it wasn't? No!

On the contrary, it has given me an avenue for research that I had not previously considered.
Quote this message in a reply
BJ
lop guest
User ID: 92230
04-24-2012 06:42 AM

 



Post: #44
RE: Tunguska revisited.
birdie  Wrote:
encephaloid  Wrote:
birdie  Wrote:
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.

Um...we have an epicenter. No volcano. Good theory though based on limited interpretation of evidence but not quite complete. Plus there's an absence of geological effects associated with volcanoes, shakes and stuff.

Did you read the peasants description upthread?

There were tremors every 15 minutes.

And there was a HUGE cloud of smoke adrift in the sky.

Sounds just like a volcanic eruption.

No offense, but I have to go with Skippy on this one. Had it been a volcanic eruption, witnesses and scientific exploration of the site would have confirmed it. No explanation has been found. It remains a mystery.
Quote this message in a reply
The Evil AC
I am not a number!!!
User ID: 666
04-24-2012 06:42 AM

 



Post: #45
RE: Tunguska revisited.
birdie  Wrote:
encephaloid  Wrote:
birdie  Wrote:
You are a f*cking moran. You should do some research on volcanoes.

Um...we have an epicenter. No volcano. Good theory though based on limited interpretation of evidence but not quite complete. Plus there's an absence of geological effects associated with volcanoes, shakes and stuff.

Did you read the peasants description upthread?

There were tremors every 15 minutes.

And there was a HUGE cloud of smoke adrift in the sky.

Sounds just like a volcanic eruption.

Was building 7 brought down by a volcano? Lmao
Quote this message in a reply



Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1