News

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 92568 04-25-2012 05:47 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

The Att Gen's are owned by the CROWN, based in London England. So is the US of A.

Here's an excerpt from Att. Gen. of Illinois Lisa Madigan's website: The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows:

" * * *

* * * 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown. 2d. By information, to bring certain classes of persons accused of crimes and misdemeanors to trial. [3rd.] By scire facias, to revoke and annul grants made by the crown improperly, or when forfeited by the grantee thereof. 4th. By information, to recover money or other chattels, or damages for wrongs committed on the land, or other possessions of the crown. 5th. By writ of quo warranto, to determine the right of him who claims or usurps any office, franchise or liberty, and to vacate the charter, or annul the existence of a corporation, for violations of its charter, or for omitting to exercise its corporate powers. 6th. By writ of mandamus, to compel the admission of an officer duly chosen to his office, and to compel his restoration when illegally ousted. 7th. By information in chancery, to enforce trusts, and to prevent public nuisances, and the abuse of trust powers. 8th. By proceedings in rem, to recover property to which the crown may be entitled, by forfeiture for treason, and property, for which there is no other legal owner, such as wrecks, treasure trove, &c. (3 Black. Com., 256-7, 260 to 266; id., 427 and 428; 4 id., 308, 312.) 9th. And in certain cases, by information in chancery, for the protection of the rights of lunatics, and others, who are under the protection of the crown. (Mitford's Pl., 24-30, Adams' Equity, 301-2.)

link please
not because i don't believe you
i want to see it
and maybe share it

have you taken that section and emailed it far and wide in your state? asking wtf they're doing talking about a "crown"? if it's there, on her site, demand answers, spread awareness, write an op-ed for your paper, kwim? this is interesting and something hardly anyone would be aware of.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 92593 04-25-2012 07:05 PM

Sitting Lunatic Wrote:

Ah... So now the U.S. Attorneys are "rising up" eh? Wow. Noting violations of law that Obama is said to have committed. Interesting. While I only vote Republican because that Party rules and the Democrats are not impressive or don't have it all together (the majority pretty much fell off the turnip truck and always leave their brains on the doorstep before entering the halls of Congress), I respect whoever is in the White House regardless of political party. Now Obama here has been trying his damndest abd yes, ends up sucking big time, this seems to me to be quite pointless other than to be assholic and disrespectful towards the President.

He who gives no respect, deserves no respect.

**seismic**

Luvapottamus Wrote:

Oops, you already listed the violations.

Glad to see Oklahoma is represented.

Surprised Idaho isn't, but then again, the EOE hires in unWashedington Diseased probably think we are near Minnesota and are still trying to enforce the Corn Laws.

**Aquarius**

LoP Guest Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
The Att Gen's are owned by the CROWN, based in London England. So is the US of A.

Here's an excerpt from Att. Gen. of Illinois Lisa Madigan's website: The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows:

" * * *

* * * 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown. 2d. By information, to bring certain classes of persons accused of crimes and misdemeanors to trial. [3rd.] By scire facias, to revoke and annul grants made by the crown improperly, or when forfeited by the grantee thereof. 4th. By information, to recover money or other chattels, or damages for wrongs committed on the land, or other possessions of the crown. 5th. By writ of quo warranto, to determine the right of him who claims or usurps any office, franchise or liberty, and to vacate the charter, or annul the existence of a corporation, for violations of its charter, or for omitting to exercise its corporate powers. 6th. By writ of mandamus, to compel the admission of an officer duly chosen to his office, and to compel his restoration when illegally ousted. 7th. By information in chancery, to enforce trusts, and to prevent public nuisances, and the abuse of trust powers. 8th. By proceedings in rem, to recover property to which the crown may be entitled, by forfeiture for treason, and property, for which there is no other legal owner, such as wrecks, treasure trove, &c. (3 Black. Com., 256-7, 260 to 266; id., 427 and 428; 4 id., 308, 312.) 9th. And in certain cases, by information in chancery, for the protection of the rights of lunatics, and others, who are under the protection of the crown. (Mitford's Pl., 24-30, Adams' Equity, 301-2.)

link please
not because i don't believe you
i want to see it
and maybe share it

have you taken that section and emailed it far and wide in your state? asking wtf they're doing talking about a "crown"? if it's there, on her site, demand answers, spread awareness, write an op-ed for your paper, kwim? this is interesting and something hardly anyone would be aware of.

I was wondering about that "crown" phrase myself!

Hiding3

**Enaid**

Bump so I can read this later.

**akhenaten**

Luvapottamus Wrote:

Oops, you already listed the violations.

Glad to see Oklahoma is represented.

I'm actually surprised. Not too shocked, but surprised none-the-less. With all of the idiot legislation kicking around this state, this one makes sense. I never thought that I'd see that day where I agree with the elected "church-ficials" of Oklahoma. chuckle

**akhenaten**

Sitting Lunatic Wrote:

Ah... So now the U.S. Attorneys are "rising up" eh? Wow. Noting violations of law that Obama is said to have committed. Interesting. While I only vote Republican because that Party rules and the Democrats are not impressive or don't have it all together (the majority pretty much fell off the turnip truck and always leave their brains on the doorstep before entering the halls of Congress), I respect whoever is in the White House regardless of political party. Now Obama here has been trying his damndest abd yes, ends up sucking big time, this seems to me to be quite pointless other than to be assholic and disrespectful towards the President.

The president has NO authority to usurp *any* citizen's constitutional rights. The NDAA, the "Patriot" Act, and the ACTA are *all* unconstitutional. Wonder why I don't see those in the list?

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 92618 04-25-2012 08:59 PM

Should read; 21 kochwhore, teabaggers piss into the wind and

get piss all over thier koch bought suits.

**Luvapottamus**

Aquarius Wrote:

LoP Guest Wrote:
LoP Guest Wrote:
The Att Gen's are owned by the CROWN, based in London England. So is the US of A.

Here's an excerpt from Att. Gen. of Illinois Lisa Madigan's website: The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows:

" * * *

* * * 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown. 2d. By information, to bring certain classes of persons accused of crimes and misdemeanors to trial. [3rd.] By scire facias, to revoke and annul grants made by the crown improperly, or when forfeited by the grantee thereof. 4th. By information, to recover money or other chattels, or damages for wrongs committed on the land, or other possessions of the crown. 5th. By writ of quo warranto, to determine the right of him who claims or usurps any office, franchise or liberty, and to vacate the charter, or annul the existence of a corporation, for violations of its charter, or for omitting to exercise its corporate powers. 6th. By writ of mandamus, to compel the admission of an officer duly chosen to his office, and to compel his restoration when illegally ousted. 7th. By information in chancery, to enforce trusts, and to prevent public nuisances, and the abuse of trust powers. 8th. By proceedings in rem, to recover property to which the crown may be entitled, by forfeiture for treason, and property, for which there is no other legal owner, such as wrecks, treasure trove, &c. (3 Black. Com., 256-7, 260 to 266; id., 427 and 428; 4 id., 308, 312.) 9th. And in certain cases, by information in chancery, for the protection of the rights of lunatics, and others, who are under the protection of the crown. (Mitford's Pl., 24-30, Adams' Equity, 301-2.)

link please
not because i don't believe you
i want to see it
and maybe share it

have you taken that section and emailed it far and wide in your state? asking wtf they're doing talking about a "crown"? if it's there, on her site, demand answers, spread awareness, write an op-ed for your paper, kwim? this is interesting and something hardly anyone would be aware of.

I was wondering about that "crown" phrase myself!

"Sovereign" retardism.

(snip)
The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows:

" * * *

* * * 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown. 2d. By information, to bring certain classes of persons accused of crimes and misdemeanors to trial. [3rd.] By scire facias, to revoke and annul grants made by the crown improperly, or when forfeited by the grantee thereof. 4th. By information, to recover money or other chattels, or damages for wrongs committed on the land, or other possessions of the crown. 5th. By writ of quo warranto, to determine the right of him who claims or usurps any office, franchise or liberty, and to vacate the charter, or annul the existence of a corporation, for violations of its charter, or for omitting to exercise its corporate powers. 6th. By writ of mandamus, to compel the admission of an officer duly chosen to...

http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/a...story.html

It's way down the page.

"Sovereigns" don't understand what common law is.

(You can buy books written by judges that explain common law." It's just traditional law. Principles of law from the past. )

If you read the whole page, you'll see the context.

chuckle

**Luvapottamus**

akhenaten Wrote:

Luvapottamus Wrote:
Oops, you already listed the violations.

Glad to see Oklahoma is represented.

I'm actually surprised. Not too shocked, but surprised none-the-less. With all of the idiot legislation kicking around this state, this one makes sense. I never thought that I'd see that day where I agree with the elected "church-ficials" of Oklahoma.

We have some good people here. And a lot of corrupt mofos. Ironically, it's been the democrats that have been overwhelmingly corrupt here.

Also, whomever posted "these are the same f*cks who caved to foreclosure fraud", is wrong.

Oklahoma has tight title plants. We require an abstract before title insurance.

chuckle

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 92052 04-25-2012 09:41 PM

Janus Wrote:

If someone had told me 20 years ago that white men in America would
be kowtowing to an African intent on our destruction I would have
thought they were insane.

Hell, ten years ago too. Am I the only person in the nation who has
not wiggerized?

We are talking tough guys. Secret Service, military, CIA, FBI, JAG,
NSA (nevermind they are wankers) What the hell are they thinking??????

The men-behind-the-curtain are most likely the CIA along with the central bankers. The pentagon has refused to release video of the 9/11 pentagon attack which leads me to believe the Joint Chiefs are either top-level bad guys or they have been bribed, threatened or blackmailed. The Bilderbergs and other elite agencies are playing a role but fleshing out their control mechanism would take more investigation.

We have enough verifiable history on the FBI to know that top elements have been dirty since 1993. Field agents of the Secret Service pulled the "close-in" security detail from Kennedy just prior to his murder.

When a totally false creation like Obama can take the office of the president, we know there are problems. When someone like Obama can remain in office after massive revelations that he is fake shows that the corruption has reached uncorrectable levels.

It's time to dissolve the federal government.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 55564 04-25-2012 10:10 PM

And let me guess, everyone of those Attorney Generals is a Republican, and none of them would make so much as a squeak about the NDAA, or the Patriot act or the assassination of American Citizens, at home or abroad.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 92637 04-25-2012 10:14 PM

Luvapottamus Wrote:

Aquarius Wrote:
LoP Guest Wrote:
link please
not because i don't believe you
i want to see it
and maybe share it

have you taken that section and emailed it far and wide in your state? asking wtf they're doing talking about a "crown"? if it's there, on her site, demand answers, spread awareness, write an op-ed for your paper, kwim? this is interesting and something hardly anyone would be aware of.

I was wondering about that "crown" phrase myself!

"Sovereign" retardism.

(snip)
The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows:

" * * *

* * * 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown. 2d. By information, to bring certain classes of persons accused of crimes and misdemeanors to trial. [3rd.] By scire facias, to revoke and annul grants made by the crown improperly, or when forfeited by the grantee thereof. 4th. By information, to recover money or other chattels, or damages for wrongs committed on the land, or other possessions of the crown. 5th. By writ of quo warranto, to determine the right of him who claims or usurps any office, franchise or liberty, and to vacate the charter, or annul the existence of a corporation, for violations of its charter, or for omitting to exercise its corporate powers. 6th. By writ of mandamus, to compel the admission of an officer duly chosen to...

http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/a...story.html

It's way down the page.

"Sovereigns" don't understand what common law is.

(You can buy books written by judges that explain common law." It's just traditional law. Principles of law from the past. )

If you read the whole page, you'll see the context.

CONTEXT my ass! They choose EXACTLY THE WORDS they wish to use. Maybe you'd like to research some more about the BAR while you're at it?

Dumbass

**Luvapottamus** · (This post was last modified: 04-25-2012 10:24 PM by Luvapottamus.)

LoP Guest Wrote:

CONTEXT my ass! They choose EXACTLY THE WORDS they wish to use. Maybe you'd like to research some more about the BAR while you're at it?

Why don't you go post some INFORMATION over on the CORPORATION thread, sovereign.

I sure hope you don't use COMMON LAW to make your points. The crown OWNS THAT.

chuckle

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 14880 04-25-2012 10:52 PM

LoP Guest Wrote:

Sitting Lunatic Wrote:
Ah... So now the U.S. Attorneys are "rising up" eh? Wow. Noting violations of law that Obama is said to have committed. Interesting. While I only vote Republican because that Party rules and the Democrats are not impressive or don't have it all together (the majority pretty much fell off the turnip truck and always leave their brains on the doorstep before entering the halls of Congress), I respect whoever is in the White House regardless of political party. Now Obama here has been trying his damndest abd yes, ends up sucking big time, this seems to me to be quite pointless other than to be assholic and disrespectful towards the President.

He who gives no respect, deserves no respect.

He gives a lot of respect. That is what makes him work better than Bush. Who also gave respect, but also had his born again judgemental pro freedom thing. Obama is more pragmatic and listens better.
The ones who have been disrespectful, before they had a chance to see any action, where the republican poor. They called him muslim from day one, inspired by their allmighty television, fox and evangelicals. Who are paid by establishment figures who just want one thing. Suck the government dry and don let it spend one dollar on people who are not corporations.
Dramaticly disrespectful most are towards the presidency. And totally going balastics over hearsay.....everytime.