News
news Russians drive over North Pole to Canada
news Concentrated Fukushima radioactive plume staying on narrow path toward U.S.
news How to Use Chinese Condiments
news Google’s Plan To Take Over The World
news 'Dead' man comes back to life at his funeral
news Visualizing The Silver Squeeze
news Geothermal Energy
news N.A Poe, Adam Kokesh and Others Arrested at Smokedown Prohibition Cannabis Protest in Philadelphia
news FEMA Plans Clear-Cutting 85,000 Berkeley and Oakland Trees
news Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls The News
news Woman who survived flesh-eating infection, receives bionic hands
news Billionaires Now Own American Politics
news Air Force Chemtrail Whistleblower Exposes Geoengineering
news Yahoo Japan suspects 22 million user IDs leaked: Kyodo
news Ruins of Lost City May Lurk Deep in Honduras Rain Forest
news Dark, massive asteroid to fly by Earth on May 31
news Greek addicts turn to deadly new drug 'sisa'
news How to Share Difficult Information with Friends
news CARA (newest advance in Facial Recognition Tech) Sees ALL, Knows All, In Real time
news How Trolls Ruin Your Ability to Reason

Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 4 Votes - 3.75 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
silversides
Registered User
User ID: 93110
04-29-2012 05:53 PM

Posts: 9,420



Post: #1
U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island

About 9,000 U.S. Marines stationed on the Japanese island of Okinawa will be moved to the U.S. territory of Guam and other locations in the Asia-Pacific, including Hawaii, under a U.S.-Japan agreement announced Thursday.
The move is part of a broader arrangement designed to tamp down tensions in the U.S.-Japan defense alliance stemming in part from opposition in Okinawa to what many view as a burdensome U.S. military presence.

It also reflects a desire by the Obama administration to spread U.S. forces more widely in the Asia-Pacific region as part of a rebalancing of U.S. defense priorities in the aftermath of a decade of war in the greater Middle East.

The agreement was outlined in a joint statement issued Thursday night by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and their Japanese counterparts.

Citing an "increasingly uncertain security environment" in the Asia-Pacific region, they said their agreement was intended to maintain a robust U.S. military presence to ensure the defense of Japan.

"Japan is not just a close ally, but also a close friend," Panetta said in a separate comment. "And I look forward to deepening that friendship and strengthening our partnership as, together, we address security challenges in the region."

The joint statement made no mention of a timetable for moving the approximately 9,000 Marines off of Okinawa. It said it would happen "when appropriate facilities are available to receive them" on Guam and elsewhere.

Under the new agreement, about 10,000 Marines will remain on Okinawa, which has been a key element of the U.S. military presence in Asia for decades. The U.S. also has a substantial Air Force presence on Okinawa.

"I think we have made some progress and this plan offers specific and forward-looking action," said Japan's Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba, who added that Japan wanted to "reduce the burden on Okinawa."

Japan, including Okinawa, is a linchpin of U.S. strategy for deterring aggression in the region and for reinforcing the Korean peninsula in the event North Korea attacked South Korea.

The Obama administration believes the new agreement with Japan will make the alliance more sustainable, while also giving the Marines more regional flexibility.

Between 4,700 and 5,000 Marines will relocate from Okinawa to Guam, according to a U.S. defense official who briefed reporters on some of the details before the agreement was official announced in Tokyo and Washington.

The remainder of the 9,000 who are to relocate from Okinawa will move to Hawaii or be part of a rotational presence in Australia and elsewhere in the region, the official said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was previewing the official announcement.
...
http://refreshingnews99.blogspot.in/2012...anese.html

VOTE FOR LOP
[Image: candle.gif] Rip Karen :(
Quote this message in a reply
ButtonsAren'tToys
Registered User
User ID: 10663
04-29-2012 06:12 PM

Posts: 9,973



Post: #2
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
It probably doesn't have anything to do with service members and their families afraid of Fukishima fall-out Anon Hiding
Quote this message in a reply
gOO~
From Static to Stasis~
User ID: 14202
04-29-2012 06:14 PM

Posts: 1,030



Post: #3
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
Ah man... I love Okinawa! Lived there for 3 years by choice. I am glad to see they are leaving some folks there because it would greatly hurt local business if they were all gone. I hope we find a good balance for all. I myself love the Japanese people and am thrilled that we are finally moving past Hiroshima and building a solid friendship!
Quote this message in a reply
silversides
Registered User
User ID: 93110
04-29-2012 06:14 PM

Posts: 9,420



Post: #4
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
I had a uncle that was at the battle of Iwo Jima and at the battle of Okinawa in WW2. He was in the navy on a ship that was already somewhat outdated when WW2 began. It did ok during the war though. My uncle worked in the engine room.

USS New York (BB-34) was a United States Navy battleship, the lead ship of her class of two (Texas being the other). She was the fifth ship to carry her name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_New_York_(BB-34)

[Image: 2FCD_4F9D68D8.jpg]

[Image: 98F8_4F9D6AF1.jpg]

So at the end of the war the Ship had two choices either the navy could keep the ship and they would sail to Philidelphia or they could scrap the ship and sail to San Francisco so my uncle said that he figured out that if he gave a bad report they would scrap the ship and everyone would get out of the navy early. So he asked the captian, if he could do it, and everyone thought it was a great idea. So everyone got out of the navy early.

VOTE FOR LOP
[Image: candle.gif] Rip Karen :(
(This post was last modified: 04-29-2012 06:28 PM by silversides.) Quote this message in a reply
Ahanata
the spaces inbetween
User ID: 76873
04-29-2012 06:18 PM

Posts: 3,562



Post: #5
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
Nah.

These shiftings of servicemen was discussed a cpl years before fukishima.

~reaching across spirals~
~It's risky, said reason. It's pointless, said ego. Give it a try, said the heart.~

nanuke did it!
Quote this message in a reply
gOO~
From Static to Stasis~
User ID: 9597
04-29-2012 06:21 PM

Posts: 1,030



Post: #6
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
ButtonsArentToys  Wrote:
It probably doesn't have anything to do with service members and their families afraid of Fukishima fall-out Anon Hiding

No.. They have been talking about doing this for years.
Quote this message in a reply
royalyflushed
Registered User
User ID: 93106
04-29-2012 06:25 PM

Posts: 483



Post: #7
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
I'm sure the Chinese will enjoy the day they take Japan ... another nation that is being prepped for the ultimate sellout!
Quote this message in a reply
silversides
Registered User
User ID: 93661
04-30-2012 12:01 PM

Posts: 9,420



Post: #8
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
So I guess they get their island back. Cheer

VOTE FOR LOP
[Image: candle.gif] Rip Karen :(
Quote this message in a reply
єηтαηgℓє∂
ᴍᴜsᴇ to Your ♏αⅾηℯsᶳ
User ID: 66284
04-30-2012 01:27 PM

Posts: 1,643



Post: #9
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
Ahanata  Wrote:
Nah.

These shiftings of servicemen was discussed a cpl years before fukishima.

~white^ ^lurker~  Wrote:
ButtonsArentToys  Wrote:
It probably doesn't have anything to do with service members and their families afraid of Fukishima fall-out Anon Hiding

No.. They have been talking about doing this for years.

I can 100% confirm that they have been talking about this build up since around late 2008'ish. It's been a back and forth game with Guam, main land US and Japan, and Guam lost. I feel horrible for that tiny 30 mile long, 8 mile wide island. I spent a total of 8 years there and can tell you that Guam will either expand beyond their dreams or go to complete and utter shhh-. There was a couple who looked like they were in their late 50's protesting this outside the gate daily for almost 2 months, then I guess they gave up.
The not so funny thing is, Japan owns must of the real estate there.

Quote this message in a reply
Soldiers bring money
lop guest
User ID: 89734
04-30-2012 01:49 PM

 



Post: #10
shocked1 RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
Okinawa is losing a major source of income. They will realize it eventually.
Quote this message in a reply
Old Whatshisname
Registered User
User ID: 52919
04-30-2012 01:56 PM

Posts: 6,884



Post: #11
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
ButtonsArentToys  Wrote:
It probably doesn't have anything to do with service members and their families afraid of Fukishima fall-out Anon Hiding

Correct. the Marines have been a sore point for the Okinawans since the 1960's; they (the Marines) are not that good for the island's economy, and getting he Marines out has been part of the politics for almost a half-century.

Fighting ignorance -- one ignoramus at a time.
Quote this message in a reply
Old Whatshisname
Registered User
User ID: 52919
04-30-2012 01:59 PM

Posts: 6,884



Post: #12
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
єηтαηgℓє∂  Wrote:
I spent a total of 8 years there and can tell you that Guam will either expand beyond their dreams or go to complete and utter shhh-.
I went to one of the two high schools there for a year, Tumon HS, before they changed the name to Kennedy HS.

Fighting ignorance -- one ignoramus at a time.
(This post was last modified: 04-30-2012 01:59 PM by Old Whatshisname.) Quote this message in a reply
silversides
Registered User
User ID: 93661
04-30-2012 02:01 PM

Posts: 9,420



Post: #13
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
Hey good morning Duncan,
Yes Okinawa is a Japanese home island and they have wanted us out for a long time.

Old Whatshisname  Wrote:
ButtonsArentToys  Wrote:
It probably doesn't have anything to do with service members and their families afraid of Fukishima fall-out Anon Hiding

Correct. the Marines have been a sore point for the Okinawans since the 1960's; they (the Marines) are not that good for the island's economy, and getting he Marines out has been part of the politics for almost a half-century.

VOTE FOR LOP
[Image: candle.gif] Rip Karen :(
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 89734
04-30-2012 03:53 PM

 



Post: #14
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
Imagine all the money those soldiers brought to that island and spent there.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 4364
04-30-2012 04:15 PM

 



Post: #15
RE: U.S. To Remove 9,000 Stationed On Japanese Island
ButtonsArentToys  Wrote:
It probably doesn't have anything to do with service members and their families afraid of Fukishima fall-out Anon Hiding

Jptdknpa no, no it doesnt. with all due respect to anyone enlisted or retired, you think they have you sign on that line so they can look out for enlisteds personal best interest? it is the military sir/mam. GETTING RADIATED is what they do for a living. they get enuff off the radars and shit without having to worry over fuku bro.
Quote this message in a reply



Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1