News

**Vlad**

LoP Guest Wrote:

USSR Wrote:
The world community should close diplomatic embassies of Britain in the countries... it is time to put into place the Bloody Mode of the Queen... 60 years of board or 12 presidential terms give it feeling of impunity and permissiveness. It is time to force to respect Britain world diplomatic norms.
Finally something I can understand.

I had an awful hangovered day needing to be sober, but I still support Assange even if a cocky ass not my type of rebell Hugs

Garry Kasparov is more in my taste, then Assange is perhaps more important.

He has the potential to be a real pain in the ass for globalist comformist´s from all trades of the political scale.

LoP Guest Wrote:

Luvapottamus Wrote:
Webster Tarpley gives an anti-Assange rant.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93YDv4IIWWQ

I found at least one flaw in the rhetoric.

But you guys who are full bore Assange supporters, go ahead and link some blockbuster stuff Wikileaks produced.

I argue my points vociferously, and sometimes I'm a real dick, but I can be swayed if you prove me wrong.

I don't have an overblown sense of my own importance, I'm just a basset hound sticking my tongue out.

But I argue hard. Prove me wrong. Show me some important leaks. Link them.
It's no ones job to sway you one way or the other. There you go acting like your important again.

Would it help if I links a couple hundred thousand pages of documents proving beyond a reasonable doubt that behind the scenes governments are thwarting diplomatic and democratic strategy?

Of course not. Because you wouldn't ready any of it even if I did link it to you. What I just stated is an absolute fact, You being to lazy or uninterested to follow the issue personally doesn't not make fact fiction- nor does it make you special in that anyone should read it FOR you and summarize.

Wikileaks is not about a important "leak", case, or "Link". It's about a vast almost unending compilation of bits and pieces of video, audio, and records absolutely 100% proving what we have all been assuming all along. You read a little bit here, you read a little bit there, and when you have personally read .001% of the total available documentation you easily realize exactly what I have already said:

Wikileaks is a source of factual information. They don't have rumors. They don't have fabricated evidence. They have information which is all 100% verifiable if you feel like taking the time to get off your ass and research it for yourself.

Wikileaks has facts. Webster Tarpley has commentary. You have nothing.

That was a logic ass-whoopin if epic proportions, worthy of a standing ovation..

Troll14

**UcDat**

Assange

**truereality** lop guest User ID: 115570 08-19-2012 05:09 PM

The alleged "victim" (Assage's girlfriend)
has always denied making the accusations and
years ago she fled to the Arab part of
Palestine to avoid constant vicious
coercion by Usa Cia and Sweden--

It is the condom--
http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/02/when...-go-along/
http://www.legitgov.org/Assanges-Alleged...ter-Crimes
http://uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=72533

No condom equals rape in Sweden.
"accuser" wanted no condom-

and
accuser Anna Ardin has moved to the
Palestinian territories to avoid
cooperating with sweden
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/239161

http://uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=72875
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2012/08/18...4/assange/
http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/465
http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/461