"In the absence of the nuclear stabilizing factor, those flash points could erupt into open-ended conventional showdowns for the highest stakes. But the Kargil War also demonstrated that nuclear deterrence is not a panacea. The possibility of future conventional wars of major consequence along India’s northern borders with Pakistan and China persists, and the Indian defense establishment must plan and prepare accordingly," the US report said"

http://daily.bhaskar.com/article/WOR-TOP....html?HT2=

indians wont plan anything till chinese army takes over delhi

LoP Guest  Wrote:

indians wont plan anything till chinese army takes over delhi

Sounds like a perfect backdrop for yet another US false flag.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

indians wont plan anything till chinese army takes over delhi

Sounds like a perfect backdrop for yet another US false flag.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

indians wont plan anything till chinese army takes over delhi

Sounds like a perfect backdrop for yet another US false flag.

does it ever occur to any of you false flag idiots that there just might be some good reasons for any of these warnings?

LoP Guest  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

indians wont plan anything till chinese army takes over delhi

Sounds like a perfect backdrop for yet another US false flag.

does it ever occur to any of you false flag idiots that there just might be some good reasons for any of these warnings?

ButtonsArentToys  Wrote:

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Sounds like a perfect backdrop for yet another US false flag.

does it ever occur to any of you false flag idiots that there just might be some good reasons for any of these warnings?

Yes, there are some good reasons for warning us about war.

But, nobody knows what you mean by this, so we first need to find
some sort of common denominator of understanding.

Are you implying that there are good guys and bad guys in the world?
That the bad guys are coming to wipe out the good guys?

"In the absence of the nuclear stabilizing factor, those flash points could erupt into open-ended conventional showdowns for the highest stakes. But the Kargil War also demonstrated that nuclear deterrence is not a panacea. The possibility of future conventional wars of major consequence along India’s northern borders with Pakistan and China persists, and the Indian defense establishment must plan and prepare accordingly," the US report said"

http://daily.bhaskar.com/article/WOR-TOP....html?HT2=

LoP Guest  Wrote:

"In the absence of the nuclear stabilizing factor, those flash points could erupt into open-ended conventional showdowns for the highest stakes. But the Kargil War also demonstrated that nuclear deterrence is not a panacea. The possibility of future conventional wars of major consequence along India’s northern borders with Pakistan and China persists, and the Indian defense establishment must plan and prepare accordingly," the US report said"

http://daily.bhaskar.com/article/WOR-TOP....html?HT2=

Op 'forgot' to make it clear that the article states it's a US think-tank called the Carnegie Endownment for International peace being cited, not the US govt at all. So that part is somewhat misleading.