HeidiLore  Wrote:

Wow, intelligent response.

Thanks ... but I screwed one part up ... and
have now jeopardized my place in the bunker

link to image: http://imgupld.lunaticoutpost.com/graphi...391FBD.jpg

A few people say this is scary. It is if you get caught up in it. But the rest of us need not be scared because this is bullshit. Any reasonable person can see what is going on here. It is actually TPTB that are scared and are trying to quell any dissent whatsoever in the most draconian way in order to put fear into the masses so that they will not dare to ... think or have any sort of opinion. Same old same old. Everyone here knows what this is about and, hopefully, we are all doing our little bit to turn the tide on these nazi tactics which are in direct contradiction to everything we believe in.

If you feel fear over these latest events then you have already become a victim of their tactics. It's bullshit and as long as there are decent lawyers around to argue the case then this nonsense will not be tollerated.

usual fringe crock of shit

and I may post this on its own thread, but for all you who think it's okay for the military to use their position to post stupid shit on web sites and facebook pages, please read the following stand by Adm. William McRaven, the head of Special Operations Command.
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/...sec_zip_it

Here is the second half of his comments:
"Let me be completely clear on this issue: USSOCOM does not endorse any political viewpoint, opinion or special interest," McRaven wrote. "I encourage, strongly encourage active participation in our political process by both active duty SOF personnel, where it is appropriate under the ethics rules and retired members of the SOF community. However, when a group brands itself as Special Operations for the purpose of pushing a specific agenda, then they have misrepresented the entire nature of SOF and life in the military."

"Our promise to the American people is that we, the military, are non-partisan, apolitical and will serve the President of the United States regardless of his political party. By attaching a Special Operation's moniker or a unit or service name to a political agenda, those individuals have now violated the most basic of our military principles," McRaven wrote.

His remarks are stronger but along the same lines as those by Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, who said the groups' efforts were counter to the ethos of the military.

"It's not useful. It's not useful to me," Dempsey said Wednesday. "And one of the things that marks us as a profession in a democracy, in our form of democracy, that's most important is that we remain apolitical. That's how we maintain our bond and trust with the American people."

and I may post this on its own thread, but for all you who think it's okay for the military to use their position to post stupid shit on web sites and facebook pages, please read the following stand by Adm. William McRaven, the head of Special Operations Command.
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/...sec_zip_it

Here is the second half of his comments:
"Let me be completely clear on this issue: USSOCOM does not endorse any political viewpoint, opinion or special interest," McRaven wrote. "I encourage, strongly encourage active participation in our political process by both active duty SOF personnel, where it is appropriate under the ethics rules and retired members of the SOF community. However, when a group brands itself as Special Operations for the purpose of pushing a specific agenda, then they have misrepresented the entire nature of SOF and life in the military."

"Our promise to the American people is that we, the military, are non-partisan, apolitical and will serve the President of the United States regardless of his political party. By attaching a Special Operation's moniker or a unit or service name to a political agenda, those individuals have now violated the most basic of our military principles," McRaven wrote.

His remarks are stronger but along the same lines as those by Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, who said the groups' efforts were counter to the ethos of the military.

"It's not useful. It's not useful to me," Dempsey said Wednesday. "And one of the things that marks us as a profession in a democracy, in our form of democracy, that's most important is that we remain apolitical. That's how we maintain our bond and trust with the American people."