News
news George Soros Switches From Physical Gold to Gold Stocks and That is Very Bullish for Gold Prices
news Four fireballs fall over U.S. in 24 hour period
news Russians drive over North Pole to Canada
news Concentrated Fukushima radioactive plume staying on narrow path toward U.S.
news How to Use Chinese Condiments
news Google’s Plan To Take Over The World
news 'Dead' man comes back to life at his funeral
news Visualizing The Silver Squeeze
news Geothermal Energy
news N.A Poe, Adam Kokesh and Others Arrested at Smokedown Prohibition Cannabis Protest in Philadelphia
news FEMA Plans Clear-Cutting 85,000 Berkeley and Oakland Trees
news Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls The News
news Woman who survived flesh-eating infection, receives bionic hands
news Billionaires Now Own American Politics
news Air Force Chemtrail Whistleblower Exposes Geoengineering
news Yahoo Japan suspects 22 million user IDs leaked: Kyodo
news Ruins of Lost City May Lurk Deep in Honduras Rain Forest
news Dark, massive asteroid to fly by Earth on May 31
news Greek addicts turn to deadly new drug 'sisa'
news How to Share Difficult Information with Friends

Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Voting in the US. I don't understand.
mael
Registered User
User ID: 99007
06-10-2012 08:52 PM

Posts: 1,114



Post: #1
Voting in the US. I don't understand.
I often see people have written to either vote for Obama or for Romney. - That's the first thing I'm confused about.

Why either of those two? Do you have to vote for one or the other? Can you vote for no one? Can you vote for someone you think is a suitable candidate for the president - even though he doesn't stand a chance?

I can understand not being able to vote for someone who is unqualified to be in the running, but what about simply not voting? Do people think it makes a difference who they vote for?

I know the States has two major parties - Republicans and Democrats. I believe they are merely two facades of the people pulling the strings behind the scenes and believe it makes no difference who you vote for because those string-pullers aren't going to change except for the worse.

Ron Paul??? It seemed he was popular with the people, but for some reason he is ineligible to stand for election? Is that right? So if Ron Paul is out of the running, do his supporters have to shift to another candidate? I thought that if the Ron Paul supporters learn their man was out of the running, then why should they vote for another hopeful who they didn't choose?

With all the bad publicity surrounding Romney, and the appalling performance of Obama plain to see, why should anyone want to vote for either of them?

* I am aware that our beloved masters (oy vei) require us peons to vote the scumbags they push at us - so THEY can rightly tell us it's our own fault for voting for them. But without that mandate, they will surely come unstuck, no?

I am generally confused about this Romney/Obama fiasco. I can't understand how anyone with an average number of functioning neurons would want to vote at all under the present conditions.

But then, I'm just an expat Brit who hasn't voted in his life, and doesn't intend to - until and when voting is done without the carpet-baggers moving sheckels under the tables.
(This post was last modified: 06-10-2012 08:53 PM by mael.)
............
INFP
User ID: 27152
06-10-2012 08:53 PM

Posts: 15,730



Post: #2
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
mael  Wrote:
I often see people have written to either vote for Obama or for Romney. - That's the first thing I'm confused about.

Why either of those two? Do you have to vote for one or the other? Can you vote for no one? Can you vote for someone you think is a suitable candidate for the president - even though he doesn't stand a chance?

I can understand voting for someone who is unqualified to be in the running, but what about simply not voting? Do people think it makes a difference who they vote for?

I know the States has two major parties - Republicans and Democrats. I believe they are merely two facades of the people pulling the strings behind the scenes and believe it makes no difference who you vote for because those string-pullers aren't going to change except for the worse.

Ron Paul??? It seemed he was popular with the people, but for some reason he is ineligible to stand for election? Is that right? So if Ron Paul is out of the running, do his supporters have to shift to another candidate? I thought that if the Ron Paul supporters learn their man was out of the running, then why should they vote for another hopeful who they didn't choose?

With all the bad publicity surrounding Romney, and the appalling performance of Obama plain to see, why should anyone want to vote for either of them?

* I am aware that our beloved masters (oy vei) require us peons to vote the scumbags they push at us - so THEY can rightly tell us it's our own fault for voting for them. But without that mandate, they will surely come unstuck, no?

I am generally confused about this Romney/Obama fiasco. I can't understand how anyone with an average number of functioning neurons would want to vote at all under the present conditions.

But then, I'm just an expat Brit who hasn't voted in his life, and doesn't intend to - until and when voting is done without the carpet-baggers moving sheckels under the tables.

You answered your own question, sadly.
Most vote because they are told they have to.
That simple.
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 101614
06-10-2012 08:54 PM

 



Post: #3
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
it's all a big scary expensive pantomime
dig
Registered User
User ID: 39243
06-10-2012 08:55 PM

Posts: 3,061



Post: #4
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
Correct, I don't understand how anyone thinks it's not the upper class being put in power by the even upper classes to keep the interest.
Investment.
Many know this, will they do something about it?
Maybe one day.

'Hell is other people'
Gibbie
^D ^D ^D whoa
User ID: 49076
06-10-2012 08:55 PM

Posts: 7,187



Post: #5
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
[Image: 4FEF_4FD4ED94.jpg]

Challenge your programming.
blind prophet
Teiresias
User ID: 88635
06-10-2012 08:56 PM

Posts: 10,521



Post: #6
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
old bs left/right paradigm, it is advanced more now though to include a false 3d option of choice to keep the "wise" in check.

honestly the choice is either to revolt or accept slow enslavement.

AJ does a good breakdown of the paradigm here but fails to mention the controlled third options, which is one reason people think he is controlled op but this video is good for the basics.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpLaD1C7egI

On being chaotic neutral...

After loving, embracing, and despising it all...

Most of the time, I just roll the bones.
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 100767
06-10-2012 09:02 PM

Posts: 20,375



Post: #7
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
mael  Wrote:
I often see people have written to either vote for Obama or for Romney. - That's the first thing I'm confused about.

Why either of those two? Do you have to vote for one or the other? Can you vote for no one? Can you vote for someone you think is a suitable candidate for the president - even though he doesn't stand a chance?

I can understand not being able to vote for someone who is unqualified to be in the running, but what about simply not voting? Do people think it makes a difference who they vote for?

I know the States has two major parties - Republicans and Democrats. I believe they are merely two facades of the people pulling the strings behind the scenes and believe it makes no difference who you vote for because those string-pullers aren't going to change except for the worse.

Ron Paul??? It seemed he was popular with the people, but for some reason he is ineligible to stand for election? Is that right? So if Ron Paul is out of the running, do his supporters have to shift to another candidate? I thought that if the Ron Paul supporters learn their man was out of the running, then why should they vote for another hopeful who they didn't choose?

With all the bad publicity surrounding Romney, and the appalling performance of Obama plain to see, why should anyone want to vote for either of them?

* I am aware that our beloved masters (oy vei) require us peons to vote the scumbags they push at us - so THEY can rightly tell us it's our own fault for voting for them. But without that mandate, they will surely come unstuck, no?

I am generally confused about this Romney/Obama fiasco. I can't understand how anyone with an average number of functioning neurons would want to vote at all under the present conditions.

But then, I'm just an expat Brit who hasn't voted in his life, and doesn't intend to - until and when voting is done without the carpet-baggers moving sheckels under the tables.

They used to trick people to vote for these assholes, but Bill Clinton let the cat out of the bag(Tragedy and Hope), and the internet was becoming a threat, so they had Al Gore run an Intentionally pathetic campaign against W to lose a"really close race" so they could install Diebold and an overtly fascist dictatorship.

And here we are.

Srjceahd

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. End the FED, bring back Greenbacks.
Wall Street Sales Tax http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
United Front Against Austerity
(This post was last modified: 06-10-2012 09:03 PM by Luvapottamus.)
entropy
Registered User
User ID: 99865
06-10-2012 09:07 PM

Posts: 21,494



Post: #8
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
Americans sadly are a lazy bunch of flag waiving pseudo patriots that only show up to vote in large numbers in Presidential Elections. Real change would involve better voter turnout and more participation in the process at the local level. It would also encompass activism and participation at the local party level and carcases. Big Mac?

Candle RIP Karen AKA SweetJane
dig
Registered User
User ID: 39243
06-10-2012 09:12 PM

Posts: 3,061



Post: #9
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
encephaloid  Wrote:
Americans sadly are a lazy bunch of flag waiving pseudo patriots that only show up to vote in large numbers in Presidential Elections. Real change would involve better voter turnout and more participation in the process at the local level. It would also encompass activism and participation at the local party level and carcases. Big Mac?

I look at this and I wonder, it really makes me go...huh?
Screaming and waving flags at some f*cker that had 5/6/7 million to spare on a drive to make him pres.

It completely deviates from any of the values people actually profess to hold dear.

What a circus.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knItRruwXEA

'Hell is other people'
(This post was last modified: 06-10-2012 09:17 PM by dig.)
mael
Registered User
User ID: 99007
06-10-2012 09:20 PM

Posts: 1,114



Post: #10
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
So I take it the people here who have their own opinion all shun Obama & Romney? That's the feeling I have felt forever though.

So if I use the membership here as a guide, neither Romney or Obama would qualify for president?

The melanin-enhanced and the non-melanin-enhanced apologists will vote robotically for the magic Negro - but that wouldn't comprise much over 15% of the people. From what I've heard, no one wants Romney anyway, so that leaves the vast majority - the overwhelming majority without a candidate of their choice.

Does this overwhelming majority vote for someone they didn't choose - I mean, does this majority vote for one or the other simply because they feel they have to vote for one of the (two) candidates THEY parade in front of them?

I wouldn't vote for someone I didn't like, so I can't understand why anyone else would do it. Does the majority keep falling for the lies and is perpetually tricked into believing the promises of a particular candidate?

* Bush said:- "Fool me once - shame on you ... fool me twice - shame on you - um, ummm, well. y'know what I mean..."
dig
Registered User
User ID: 39243
06-10-2012 09:22 PM

Posts: 3,061



Post: #11
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
mael  Wrote:
So I take it the people here who have their own opinion all shun Obama & Romney? That's the feeling I have felt forever though.

So if I use the membership here as a guide, neither Romney or Obama would qualify for president?

The melanin-enhanced and the non-melanin-enhanced apologists will vote robotically for the magic Negro - but that wouldn't comprise much over 15% of the people. From what I've heard, no one wants Romney anyway, so that leaves the vast majority - the overwhelming majority without a candidate of their choice.

Does this overwhelming majority vote for someone they didn't choose - I mean, does this majority vote for one or the other simply because they feel they have to vote for one of the (two) candidates THEY parade in front of them?

I wouldn't vote for someone I didn't like, so I can't understand why anyone else would do it. Does the majority keep falling for the lies and is perpetually tricked into believing the promises of a particular candidate?

* Bush said:- "Fool me once - shame on you ... fool me twice - shame on you - um, ummm, well. y'know what I mean..."
Only fools think voting means anything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjmjqlOPd6A

'Hell is other people'
mael
Registered User
User ID: 99007
06-10-2012 09:26 PM

Posts: 1,114



Post: #12
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
I forgot about the Mestizos - they're likely to vote for Obama because they feel through him they can milk the US easily.

So Non-Whites will generally vote for Obama because it means they get free stuff. That's what? 25% of the population?

Romney might seem attractive to gullible fools who believe Romney is somehow going to be behind a push for people to work for their living? I can see Romney as being as popular as a stand-up comedian at a funeral with the melanin-enhanced.
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 100767
06-10-2012 09:31 PM

Posts: 20,375



Post: #13
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
mael  Wrote:
I forgot about the Mestizos - they're likely to vote for Obama because they feel through him they can milk the US easily.

So Non-Whites will generally vote for Obama because it means they get free stuff. That's what? 25% of the population?

Romney might seem attractive to gullible fools who believe Romney is somehow going to be behind a push for people to work for their living? I can see Romney as being as popular as a stand-up comedian at a funeral with the melanin-enhanced.

Whom do you prefer this time, Putin or Medvedev?

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. End the FED, bring back Greenbacks.
Wall Street Sales Tax http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
United Front Against Austerity
(This post was last modified: 06-10-2012 09:31 PM by Luvapottamus.)
dig
Registered User
User ID: 39243
06-10-2012 09:31 PM

Posts: 3,061



Post: #14
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
mael  Wrote:
I forgot about the Mestizos - they're likely to vote for Obama because they feel through him they can milk the US easily.

So Non-Whites will generally vote for Obama because it means they get free stuff. That's what? 25% of the population?

Romney might seem attractive to gullible fools who believe Romney is somehow going to be behind a push for people to work for their living? I can see Romney as being as popular as a stand-up comedian at a funeral with the melanin-enhanced.
Stop talking shit.

'Hell is other people'
Forgot my secret word
and so on and so forth...
User ID: 91498
06-10-2012 09:32 PM

Posts: 3,017



Post: #15
RE: Voting in the US. I don't understand.
I don't understand either, bro. But I can play the repeater and tell you all of the lies that have been fed to me since birth.



Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication
HiFi High-End Audio PSUs for Laptops, Netbooks, Phono Preamps, USB Cables.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1