News

**FreeFlow** · (This post was last modified: 03-02-2011 12:46 PM by FreeFlow.)

Edit:
I have merged the pic evidences into the OP here below ...
Here's the site I took most of the pics from:
Undeniable Proof that Paul McCartney was replaced with a Look-Alike:
http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html

Here is an interview with George Harrison from 1992 where he tells the whole story about Paul and what happened after his death:
THE KING IS NAKED!
http://digilander.libero.it/p_truth/index.html

The analysis of two Italian face recognition experts:
http://60if.proboards.com/index.cgi?boar...hread=3252
*************************************************************************************

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdHcHN8Fzto

Check the two different head shapes, the replacement has a significantly longer face and head, also is two inches taller than the original one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL1qCO04dpg

Height difference between Faul and Paul:

[Image: janewpaul.jpg]

]

These two were matched to the size of the bass guitar, and again the noise differences are apparent:

[Image: paulfaulbassheight2.jpg]

Paul was about the same height as John, Faul is significantly taller than Lennon:

[Image: hp2.jpg]

Now on the Abbey Road cover Paul is the tallest of them despite that he is the only one who wears no shoes

Faces:

Check how the nose region changes here, also the eyes of Paul were much wider apart, the latter never changes with aging:

[Image: 2person.gif]

Guess who this is: [Image: thesameperson.gif]

The cheeks aren't quite right at this point despite plastic surgery, also again the differences of the noses even if Faul wears an artificial nose tip here:

[Image: paulmccartneyfauxpaulopenmouth.jpg]

[Image: paulmccartneyfauxpaulopenmouth.jpg]

These photos show the original noses of both:

[Image: paulfaulnosecomparison.jpg]

Watch his face when Letterman addresses the rumor ..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIdDB5Hw0...re=related

~~Urinal Cake~~ · **~~Urinal Cake~~** Banned User ID: 10981 10-23-2010 10:22 PM **Posts: 4,611**

Nope, not dead.

**FreeFlow**

So how could Paul grow two inches suddenly at the age of 24 years?

~~Urinal Cake~~ · **~~Urinal Cake~~** Banned User ID: 10981 10-23-2010 10:35 PM **Posts: 4,611**

FreeFlow Wrote:

So how could Paul grow two inches suddenly at the age of 24 years?

I didn't see the measurement being taken. Who said it happened?

**tethys**

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music...splay.html

A collection of rare photographs showing the Beatles during their early years, including images from a holiday in Tenerife, are to be put on display.

**FreeFlow**

Urinal Cake Wrote:

I didn't see the measurement being taken. Who said it happened?

Here are some comparisons:
http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc42.html

~~Urinal Cake~~ · **~~Urinal Cake~~** Banned User ID: 10981 10-23-2010 10:57 PM **Posts: 4,611**

That proves nothing to me. Too many differant camera angles.

**FreeFlow**

Urinal Cake Wrote:

That proves nothing to me. Too many differant camera angles.

Relative heights don't change significantly if the vertical viewing angle is altered and the distances of the objects from the cam are about the same.

But as you please lol ...

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 10292 10-23-2010 11:13 PM

What is needed here is SCIENCE. Have any anthropologists who specialize in facial morphology chimed in on this issue?

Personally, I am highly suspicious and am leaning in the "Paul was replaced" direction.

**FreeFlow**

**FreeFlow** · (This post was last modified: 10-23-2010 11:36 PM by FreeFlow.)

Check the nose especially, besides that face of faul on the right is much longer and the head bigger while paul has a much round rounder face:

[Image: paulsmallhead.jpg]

**FreeFlow**

LoP Guest Wrote:

What is needed here is SCIENCE. Have any anthropologists who specialize in facial morphology chimed in on this issue?

Personally, I am highly suspicious and am leaning in the "Paul was replaced" direction.

Not that I heard of, the experts have to play along I suppose ...

**Da Swede**

The thing is not if Paul is dead or not, we don´t know that...
what´s quite clear is that Paul was replaced as a Beatle in the autumn of 1966. Check this site and check all the subsequent pages after this one...
http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html

Whenever this is posted at the GLP, the feriocity of the attacking mods is quite telling.....the subject is almost as forbidden as bringing up Tavistock!!

**FreeFlow**

Da Swede Wrote:

The thing is not if Paul is dead or not, we don´t know that...
what´s quite clear is that Paul was replaced as a Beatle in the autumn of 1966. Check this site and check all the subsequent pages after this one...
http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html

Whenever this is posted at the GLP, the feriocity of the attacking mods is quite telling.....the subject is almost as forbidden as bringing up Tavistock!!

Yes DS that is the site I took the pics from, there's another one that deals with the samev topic:
http://digilander.libero.it/p_truth/index.html

**Da Swede**

LoP Guest Wrote:

What is needed here is SCIENCE. Have any anthropologists who specialize in facial morphology chimed in on this issue?

Personally, I am highly suspicious and am leaning in the "Paul was replaced" direction.

Yes, actually there was an article in the Italian issue of Wire that had a couple of scientists of the field that claimed that Paul has been replaced. I don´t think it has been published outside of Italy, I just found some blog with partial translations of the article, but it did back up what a lot of us claim, Paul is out, Faul is in... !!