News

**Mike** lop guest User ID: 94568 06-07-2012 07:35 PM

SuzieQ Wrote:

A2k Wrote:
chemtard still applies even if you are found to be correct. got anything better than an infowars link?

This was an interesting thread at another site:

http://No Recruiting./showthread.php?tid=7799

Looks like more b.s. posted and made by people who want chemfails to exist.

~~I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ~~

This app shows what some call "chemtrails" actually are

http://itg1.meteor.wisc.edu/wxwise/contrails/t3.html

**A2k** · **A2k** edgy and antisocial User ID: 86503 06-07-2012 07:38 PM **Posts: 860**

thanks Suzie. Heartflowers

**Mike** lop guest User ID: 94568 06-07-2012 07:38 PM

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:

This app shows what some call "chemtrails" actually are

http://itg1.meteor.wisc.edu/wxwise/contrails/t3.html

Truth and logic is not well met by chemtards.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101015 06-07-2012 07:39 PM

SuzieQ Wrote:

A Carnegie Institution for Science proposal to spray aerosol particles into the upper atmosphere to block out the sun and “tackle global warming” would turn sunny blue skies into a hazy white, a process that many contend is already taking place via the chemtrails phenomenon.

“Blue skies would fade to hazy white if geoengineers inject light-scattering aerosols into the upper atmosphere to offset global warming. Critics have already warned that this might happen, but now the effect has been quantified,”reports New Scientist.
“Releasing sulphate aerosols high in the atmosphere should in theory reduce global temperatures by reflecting a small percentage of the incoming sunlight away from the Earth. However, the extra particles would also scatter more of the remaining light into the atmosphere. This would reduce by 20 per cent the amount of sunlight that takes a direct route to the ground, and it would increase levels of softer, diffuse scattered light, says Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science in Stanford, California.”

Scientists now admit that vapor trails from airplanes are creating “artificial clouds” that block out the sun. This is no longer a matter of debate. The chemtrail “conspiracy theorists,” who were ridiculed for pointing out that from the mid-90′s onwards contrails from jet planes were lingering for hours and forming artificial clouds, have been proven correct.

Read the rest here:

http://www.infowars.com/carnegie-institu...k-the-sun/

Cue trolls in 3......2.......1......

Gee look at the source. Again, no evidence what so ever that chemtrails exist.

I suppose you think the earth is hollow as well?

**SuzieQ** lop guest User ID: 46209 06-07-2012 07:40 PM

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:

This app shows what some call "chemtrails" actually are

http://itg1.meteor.wisc.edu/wxwise/contrails/t3.html

Maybe The US Air Force Academy can give us an explanation for this?

http://www.bookfinder4u.com/IsbnSearch.a...ode=direct

BTW, have you looked though all the patents yet?

**SuzieQ** lop guest User ID: 46209 06-07-2012 07:40 PM

A2k Wrote:

thanks Suzie.

You're welcome! Heartflowers

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101016 06-07-2012 07:41 PM

Abstract. The formation and evolution of fine particles and ice con-trails in an aircraft exhaust plume containing varying amounts of fuelsulfur have been simulated using an advanced aerosol microphysicsmodel. The "core" sulfate and soot particles are tracked during thecontrail formation and dissipation phases. When ion electrostaticeffects are incorporated into the microphysics, sulfuric acid vaporemitted by high-sulfur-content fuels generates water-soluble parti-cles that are large enough to be activated into contrails, improving theagreement between simulations and measurements. Our results alsosuggest that ice crystals formed in contrails efficiently scavengevapors and particles, creating a sulfate aerosol accumulation modethat may contribute to cloud CCN/IN. The size distributions ofaerosols produced both in the presence and absence of contrails agreereasonable well with the two characteristic types observed in theplumes of commercial aircraft.

Schumann et al. (1996) found significant dif-ferences in particle concentrations and contrail optical properties inside-by-side plumes from the same aircraft whose engines burnedfuels with different fuel sulfur contents (FSC's) of 170 and 5500ppmm. These measurements demonstrate that fuel sulfur emissionshave the capacity to modify significantly the character of plumeaerosols and contrails.

http://www.albany.edu/~yfq/papers/YuTurc...L03695.pdf

~~I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ~~ · (This post was last modified: 06-07-2012 07:42 PM by I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ.)

SuzieQ Wrote:

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:
This app shows what some call "chemtrails" actually are

http://itg1.meteor.wisc.edu/wxwise/contrails/t3.html

Maybe The US Air Force Academy can give us an explanation for this?

http://www.bookfinder4u.com/IsbnSearch.a...ode=direct

BTW, have you looked though all the patents yet?

At best it is circumstantial evidence

**A2k** · **A2k** edgy and antisocial User ID: 86503 06-07-2012 07:42 PM **Posts: 860**

Agonist Wrote:

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:
This app shows what some call "chemtrails" actually are

http://itg1.meteor.wisc.edu/wxwise/contrails/t3.html

Truth and logic is not well met by chemtards.

im only half chemtard. Wichita has an airport, four airstrips owned by various aircraft companies and an airforce base. ive seen some crazy stuff in the sky.

~~I┴∀NIW∩˥˥Iʞ~~

A2k Wrote:

Agonist Wrote:
ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:
This app shows what some call "chemtrails" actually are

http://itg1.meteor.wisc.edu/wxwise/contrails/t3.html

Truth and logic is not well met by chemtards.

im only half chemtard. Wichita has an airport, four airstrips owned by various aircraft companies and an airforce base. ive seen some crazy stuff in the sky.

I wouldent call people chemtards cuz 1 day they might be proven correct.

**A2k** · **A2k** edgy and antisocial User ID: 86503 06-07-2012 07:45 PM **Posts: 860**

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:

A2k Wrote:
Agonist Wrote:
Truth and logic is not well met by chemtards.

im only half chemtard. Wichita has an airport, four airstrips owned by various aircraft companies and an airforce base. ive seen some crazy stuff in the sky.

I wouldent call people chemtards cuz 1 day they might be proven correct.

sorry, i dont see it as a derogatory term.

**LoP Guest** lop guest User ID: 101016 06-07-2012 07:45 PM

Colors of contrails from fuels with different sulfur contents

During a recent flight experiment, contrails were produced from fuels with normal and very high sulfur content. A color effect was observed [Schumann et al, 1996]. When observed with the Sun in the back, the low-sulfur contrail appeared grey with weak contrast against the cloud deck underneath, whereas the high-sulfur contrail appeared slightly brown with higher contrast. In order to give an explanation, we compute the optical properties of the soot-containing droplets in the contrails and perform a simple radiative transfer computation. We find that the degree of activation of the soot particles is the basic parameter for the explanation of color and contrast of the contrails. It determines the size and number concentration of the droplets, which both in turn determine the optical properties of the contrail as a whole. For the visual appearance of the relatively optically thin contrails (τ ≲ 1.2) the soot volume fraction in the droplets plays only a minor role.
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1996/96JD01169.shtml

**Stupid Shills...** lop guest User ID: 100747 06-07-2012 07:46 PM

Agonist Wrote:

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:
This app shows what some call "chemtrails" actually are

http://itg1.meteor.wisc.edu/wxwise/contrails/t3.html

Truth and logic is not well met by chemtards.

Aw...

Too bad youre a shill.. I kinda liked this shill.

**SuzieQ** lop guest User ID: 46209 06-07-2012 07:47 PM

ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:

SuzieQ Wrote:
ĶĨĽĿŨМľŃǺŢľ Wrote:
This app shows what some call "chemtrails" actually are

http://itg1.meteor.wisc.edu/wxwise/contrails/t3.html

Maybe The US Air Force Academy can give us an explanation for this?

http://www.bookfinder4u.com/IsbnSearch.a...ode=direct

BTW, have you looked though all the patents yet?

At best it is circumstantial evidence

Riiighttttt! I take it you've read through all the patents? The fact that a training manual on chemtrails exists by The USAFA is "circumstantial"?