Most importantly, why were two assault rifles recovered if there was a single shooter?

Initial reports said that the shooters were armed with AR-15's, plural.

Was it 8 guns recovered or 8 weapons? A knife would mean 7 guns, that's still a lot for a single shooter.

From Gander Mountain and a local (to him), gun shop.

Sonofabiscuit  Wrote:

Most importantly, why were two assault rifles recovered if there was a single shooter?

Initial reports said that the shooters were armed with AR-15's, plural.

Was it 8 guns recovered or 8 weapons? A knife would mean 7 guns, that's still a lot for a single shooter.

Yeah there are big contradictions in the early reporting and eyewitness accounts. If you sift through the pinned thread we did a pretty good job posting all the details as we got them. First report is guy enters lobby 15 minutes after movie starts,

Then we hear 2 shooters,(first one let the other one in through an exit

Then he entered by kicking in or knocking down the exit door and it was 1 guy.
I've found that the early reports are often but not always, the most credible...after that the mSM spin doctors start to color the coloring book..

But that thread is really long now.

I stayed up all night and posted until maybe 11am, and I'm not even trying to catch up after page 22 or so.

There was more interesting stuff in that thread, but the influx of late-comers and waves of speculation made it not worth messing with to me.

And I don't want to be immersed in that for such an extended amount of time. It's a bummer, not psychologically healthy.

If you sift through the pinned thread we did a pretty good job posting all the details as we got them.
====================================
But that thread is really long now.

I stayed up all night and posted until maybe 11am, and I'm not even trying to catch up after page 22 or so.

There was more interesting stuff in that thread, but the influx of late-comers and waves of speculation made it not worth messing with to me.

And I don't want to be immersed in that for such an extended amount of time. It's a bummer, not psychologically healthy.

Okay....I believe that James Holmes is a programmed (brain washed) operative of a US government, or possibly international, agenda, to disarm the population, and that this is a false flag event.

That said....if we act on the MSM basis that Holmes is the genuine lone nut that's always paraded before us (why are these guys never members of real anarchic or terrorist groups, we never seem to have problems with them?) where the hell does an unemployed 24 year old college student from the suburbs get the money, contacts and training, to locate and use the kind of weaponry that Holmes allegedly had? Gas grenades? Multiple firearms? Bombs? How the hell does he collect this stuff? From Eric Holder?

I can buy some nut getting crazed, especially on anti-depressants, and getting pissed off enough to shoot up a theater....maybe, although the timing seems a little too convenient right now with all the anti gun stuff happening like the Law of the Sea Treaty....but what I CAN'T understand....is how he can get all this equipment, pay for it, and then know how to use everything so effectively. I know college kids in their 20s and most of them would have trouble operating anything more complicated than a car and a bong. I might be able to locate someone who would sell me A gun...or two....but all this equipment? Do any of you folks know how you, or some messed up 24 year old of your acquaintance, could buy body armor, gas grenades, multiple weapons, bombs, etc? It doesn't sound right and it doesn't seem to fit in with his reclusive (and unemployed) personality.

Is anyone ever going to ask the logical questions anymore? That to me is the first one I'd ask. Then if we look at something like the Sandusky case....no one asks the logical question there either, which is....who else was involved? Well....maybe that's the logical question here too, but I'm betting that the answer will lie behind some secret government agency's doors.

Schadenfreude  Wrote:

From Gander Mountain and a local (to him), gun shop.

I think they called it a Pro Bass shop. on the news

Sonofabiscuit  Wrote:

Most importantly, why were two assault rifles recovered if there was a single shooter?

Initial reports said that the shooters were armed with AR-15's, plural.

Was it 8 guns recovered or 8 weapons? A knife would mean 7 guns, that's still a lot for a single shooter.

Yeah there are big contradictions in the early reporting and eyewitness accounts. If you sift through the pinned thread we did a pretty good job posting all the details as we got them. First report is guy enters lobby 15 minutes after movie starts,

Then we hear 2 shooters,(first one let the other one in through an exit

Then he entered by kicking in or knocking down the exit door and it was 1 guy.



But that thread is really long now.

I stayed up all night and posted until maybe 11am, and I'm not even trying to catch up after page 22 or so.

There was more interesting stuff in that thread, but the influx of late-comers and waves of speculation made it not worth messing with to me.

And I don't want to be immersed in that for such an extended amount of time. It's a bummer, not psychologically healthy.

Luvapottamus  Wrote:

Sonofabiscuit  Wrote:

Most importantly, why were two assault rifles recovered if there was a single shooter?

Initial reports said that the shooters were armed with AR-15's, plural.

Was it 8 guns recovered or 8 weapons? A knife would mean 7 guns, that's still a lot for a single shooter.

Yeah there are big contradictions in the early reporting and eyewitness accounts. If you sift through the pinned thread we did a pretty good job posting all the details as we got them. First report is guy enters lobby 15 minutes after movie starts,

Then we hear 2 shooters,(first one let the other one in through an exit

Then he entered by kicking in or knocking down the exit door and it was 1 guy.
I've found that the early reports are often but not always, the most credible...after that the mSM spin doctors start to color the coloring book..

But that thread is really long now.

I stayed up all night and posted until maybe 11am, and I'm not even trying to catch up after page 22 or so.

There was more interesting stuff in that thread, but the influx of late-comers and waves of speculation made it not worth messing with to me.

And I don't want to be immersed in that for such an extended amount of time. It's a bummer, not psychologically healthy.

Luvapottamus  Wrote:

If you sift through the pinned thread we did a pretty good job posting all the details as we got them.
====================================
But that thread is really long now.

I stayed up all night and posted until maybe 11am, and I'm not even trying to catch up after page 22 or so.

There was more interesting stuff in that thread, but the influx of late-comers and waves of speculation made it not worth messing with to me.

And I don't want to be immersed in that for such an extended amount of time. It's a bummer, not psychologically healthy.

I was really proud of us too, we did I fine job.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Luvapottamus  Wrote:

Yeah there are big contradictions in the early reporting and eyewitness accounts. If you sift through the pinned thread we did a pretty good job posting all the details as we got them. First report is guy enters lobby 15 minutes after movie starts,

Then we hear 2 shooters,(first one let the other one in through an exit

Then he entered by kicking in or knocking down the exit door and it was 1 guy.
I've found that the early reports are often but not always, the most credible...after that the mSM spin doctors start to color the coloring book..

But that thread is really long now.

I stayed up all night and posted until maybe 11am, and I'm not even trying to catch up after page 22 or so.

There was more interesting stuff in that thread, but the influx of late-comers and waves of speculation made it not worth messing with to me.

And I don't want to be immersed in that for such an extended amount of time. It's a bummer, not psychologically healthy.

I bolded the part you wrote to make it clear.

I agree with that.

Newsrooms get many of the early details right off police scanners.

It's all they have to work with, and it's a pretty good source.

But somebody did post some audio, that portends to show it was a "drill" that went live ala Webster Tarpley.

Somebody should post a thread just on that if it sounds like that. I haven't heard it, couldn't play the file originally, can't relocate it, too tired to look.

It's on the main thread somewhere. And it might be total BS. There were disinfo artists jumping all over that thread at various points. Don't know if they were official, or just assholes.