News
news Israeli Archaeologist Discovers Huge Monument Older Than The Pyramids
news Who's getting paid in the battle of "net neutrality"
news The Mysterious Celestial Spheres of the Ancient Mughal Empire
news DARPA testing planes with a 'Star Wars'-style laser cannon
news Philippines evacuates thousands as volcano glows red
news How Tibetans Adapted to Such High Altitudes
news NATO Chief Warns Moscow
news Ocean algae can evolve fast to tackle climate change: study
news Should We All Take a Bit of Lithium?
news Seven Wonders of the Solar System
news Engineering Mosquitoes to Spread Health

Advertisement
Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Which do you think was more faked the World Trade Center 9/11 or Sandy Hook ?
TheCandleMaker
lop guest
User ID: 106120
12-25-2012 07:25 PM

 



Post: #1
work Which do you think was more faked the World Trade Center 9/11 or Sandy Hook ?
Advertisement
So which one was more government created ?
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement

LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 141497
12-25-2012 07:28 PM

 



Post: #2
RE: Which do you think was more faked the World Trade Center 9/11 or Sandy Hook ?
Did you not get the memo?

Apparently the default mentality i should go with when dealing with sandy hook is TO NOT THINK AT ALL, simply have faith that it is part of the plot.
Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 36058
12-25-2012 07:43 PM

 



Post: #3
RE: Which do you think was more faked the World Trade Center 9/11 or Sandy Hook ?
the pivotal "issues" with the collapse of the twin towers are that tower 7 collapsed for no reason and that both towers collapsed as if by controlled demolition. While I can't offer any rationalization for tower 7's collapse it is certainly plausible that both towers were rigged to be safely collapsed to avoid a much more serious problem if they ever fell like a tree across Manhattan.

These problems share in common the obvious issues surrounding the Kennedy assassinations. Mainly the obviousness of the event, magnitude of the event and the potential purpose that could have motivated them to be selected as black flag operations.

In the case of the recent school massacre the magnitude, obviousness and motive are not nearly as pronounced. There isn't enough evidence to believe a black flag op occurred, imo.

The majority of the bruhaha following the event is attributable to spontaneous frenzied attachment within the media and the public itself to what is in reality not a very significant event in the first place.

This reeks of tail wagging dog. It reeks of opportunism after the fact much more than a covert op planned in advance to provide a specific result.

Respectable conspiracy theorists need to be elite skeptics first and resistant to flights of imagination. There is only one objective truth out there, and finding it requires significant investigative prowess. After all this is a needle in a haystack.
Quote this message in a reply












Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS 2.1