I will but I have certain demands. I want 10 non virgin girls 21 to 24 years old and to be named grand high inquisitor of the goonie people. Do that and provide a weekly musical and I am in.

barbsat  Wrote:

I will but I have certain demands. I want 10 non virgin girls 21 to 24 years old and to be named grand high inquisitor of the goonie people. Do that and provide a weekly musical and I am in.

A real Diva would have asked for Dasani in their dressing room. You're too easy.

feverpitch  Wrote:

barbsat  Wrote:

I will but I have certain demands. I want 10 non virgin girls 21 to 24 years old and to be named grand high inquisitor of the goonie people. Do that and provide a weekly musical and I am in.

A real Diva would have asked for Dasani in their dressing room. You're too easy.

Can I amend my demands?

You are not going to be successful at anything other than irritating the piss out of everyone here.
Give it about 20-30 more years of living and then you might have a clue on what works and what doesn't.
It's been said before and bears repeating again...the only reason you hate money is because YOU DON'T HAVE ANY.
And you are a vandal and thief to boot!
If someone handed you a million dollar bank account you'd have so much bling and driving around looking all cool in your fancy wheels and living it up so quick and you'd shut up real quick about the evils of money and be struttin' around like all the other playas.

The Evil AC  Wrote:

who unbanned your dumbass?

somebody who wants good threads bumped off the front page.

I don't see why not. As long as I still had my own personal rights. You could have a completely Constitutional yet moneyless barter society right here in America without being considered communist, or even socialist.

Jackinthebox  Wrote:

I don't see why not. As long as I still had my own personal rights. You could have a completely Constitutional yet moneyless barter society right here in America without being considered communist, or even socialist.

But see if you have followed Kash's other threads... He has this dream of collective living, where people are forced to put in, in order to receive the handouts from those that run the collectives.

Which is communist/socialist

Elizabeth  Wrote:

Jackinthebox  Wrote:

I don't see why not. As long as I still had my own personal rights. You could have a completely Constitutional yet moneyless barter society right here in America without being considered communist, or even socialist.

But see if you have followed Kash's other threads... He has this dream of collective living, where people are forced to put in, in order to receive the handouts from those that run the collectives.

Which is communist/socialist

while i don't believe in a forced society., i think it's foolish to dismiss the benefits of certain aspects of "socialism" and labeling them as communist=bad bad bad.

we need to modify our language around such things if we ever hope to evolve past our sticking points.

Why collective? We aint bees or ants you know.

Why cant I live in a moneyless country and roam about, maybe settle down with and have a family and grow my own food?

Why are you stating it has to be a collective villiage?

I abstain.

LoP Guest  Wrote:

Elizabeth  Wrote:

But see if you have followed Kash's other threads... He has this dream of collective living, where people are forced to put in, in order to receive the handouts from those that run the collectives.

Which is communist/socialist

while i don't believe in a forced society., i think it's foolish to dismiss the benefits of certain aspects of "socialism" and labeling them as communist=bad bad bad.

we need to modify our language around such things if we ever hope to evolve past our sticking points.

That's what George Orwell called Newspeak. How timely and relevant.