|
Thread Rating:
- 12 Votes - 2.33 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
|
Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
|
Luvapottamus Registered User User ID: 109398 07-24-2012 12:34 AM
Posts: 20,358
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 57621 07-24-2012 12:34 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 58637 07-24-2012 12:36 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
I'd live in a moneyless collective village...not a city.
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 108764 07-24-2012 12:36 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 57621 07-24-2012 01:19 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
LoP Guest Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:here is one list of communes
http://directory.ic.org/iclist/
and what part of the word "forming" do you not understand? 
you do realize that page was just the places starting with A right?
it means that tons of new communities are continuing to form. it means that they haven't run their course as a viable option in society as far as going somewhere to learn how to interact in sustainable community. you could look at it as one of the faster growing enterprises out there...but because it's not for profit most sheeple won't hear about it.
you also would have to look at the 1000's of listings on woofing sites as co-op communities. and new ones being added every week.
the revolution is not about guns it's about consciousness. it's r)evolution.
i think it's sad that people believe that the back to the earth movement spawned in the 60's has died. it is more diversified and an inventive than ever. the biggest difference between now and then is that communities have grown past the point of, "hey look at us, we're changing the world". which is really great because it no longer seems to attract the dirt bags and miscreants that muck it all up. these are smart educated people that don't just talk about doing things, they actually get it done. cutting edge shit too.
|
|
|
|
Ka$h Killa lop guest User ID: 108623 07-24-2012 03:58 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
Elizabeth Wrote:Elizabeth Wrote:LoP Guest Wrote:what i said was that there are benefits to certain aspects of what is called socialism and that we should not just throw the baby out with the bathwater because of how we've allowed things to be defined.
food, shelter and power, things everyone needs, could easily be part of a common collective expense. but because peeps are programmed to believe that anything along those lines is socialism/communism it's dismissed without any imaginative consideration.
taking certain goods, the "basic needs items", out of the capitalist market and making them part of a collective social empowerment system would not make us communists. it would work to un-enslave us from certain families who run the planet by locking up the food and oil until we pay them for it.
And how would such things be paid for? Who would provide them?
If you automatically require payment through taxes and such. What about those that do not work or contribute?
I would really like some answers to these things.
I cannot seem to grasp these concepts that you people have, so please explain them to me.
If those things are free to people. What would keep many from never turning off lights or conserving energy?
If food was free... What would prevent people from eating like it was an all you can eat buffet?
Just curious?
Not to mention... Who would grow this food? Who will work at the refineries? To provide a free product, wouldnt the production of it also have to be cost free? Who would do the work to provide such things for nothing?
Ill answer these questions one at a time
1. In my collective, electricity would be limited, not by force, but just by basic electrical laws. If people start exceeding the limited supply, current will increase and if not enough watts are being produced, voltage will drop. This will result in a brownout. However, i would install breakers to control the amps, so if too much was being used, the breaker would trip and stop your energy use. And i would install controls to reduce power availibilty at night just to prevent the lights from being kept on all night.
2. If people ate all they could all the time, you'd have alot of fat people in the collective. Is this what you were worried about. Its possible, but not likely. Maybe a few people will get really fat. Probably not though if this is a vegan community
3. Farming methods toady allow for efficent production and 15-20 acres could produce enough food to feed at least 100 people for a year. I would grow high yield crops like potatoes, beans, squash, etc, and maybe some lower yield crops like wheat.
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 110374 07-24-2012 03:59 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
I would. I have good recipes and survival skills.
|
|
|
|
Ka$h Killa lop guest User ID: 108623 07-24-2012 04:01 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
LoP Guest Wrote:I'd live in a moneyless collective village...not a city.
What would be the highest population you;d consider living in?
|
|
|
|
Ka$h Killa lop guest User ID: 108623 07-24-2012 04:09 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
kettlnaut Wrote:But see the problem is you are still relying on an infrastructure. What happens if the water supply dries up? What happens if a major geological event occurs? Not trying to knock, I appreciate the intent behind your efforts, but if we ever want to move past this society with it's built in pyramid structure just ripe for abusing, then we need to learn from the mistakes of the past.
To me, the biggest mistake that we have all made in this modern age, is reliance on infrastructure. Without the big oil infrastructure you can't go anywhere, goods are not shipped to the stores etc. So having a centralized community is one way to solve part of the conundrum, you can move away from fossil fuels entirely if you are creative.
But that still leaves a vulnerable water/power/sewer infrastructure that can either be sabotaged or leveraged against the community if one so desires. So, what must be done is give people total self sufficiency, either through new technology (preferable to those used to modern convenience) or through rustic means of living off the land.
If we could get past the greed and let out all of the wonderful developments that have been suppressed over the years, we could basically live in a anti-gravity vehicle that is also our home. A spaceship. The key is that it is self reliant, it can pull water from vapor in the air, it can power itself either through solar or other even more advanced energy tech.
Or you could just teach people how to farm, use herbs and natural remedies, and how to find and purify water naturally. I think that at least would be a start. Give a man a fish he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for the rest of his life.
Thats why you always have a backup plan. Like tablets to purify the water in case an angry rich guy decides to poison your water. of course that would be a bigger problem because everybody might be dead then. I would definitely focus alot on preventing sabotage especially if the community got larger. If it was small (100 people or so) and everybody kept to themselves, i wouldn;t see a problem, but if it got bigger, like a Venus Project city, then id be concerned. Because if 50,000 people lived there, it wouldn't be so easy to have a backup water supply, and it would be harder if the electricity went out
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 110284 07-24-2012 04:31 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
better poll might be, who would rather pull the plug today or continue this madening decent for another 50 years?
aint the darkness man, its the decent that's going to take most you out the game.
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 98922 07-24-2012 04:31 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
Wow, free shit, no money needed? Hell yeah, I'd be all over THAT, screw working to get money for stuff.
BTW, who's gonna pick up the tab for all this?
|
|
|
|
Forbidden Truth Registered User User ID: 91795 07-25-2012 12:57 AM
Posts: 387
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
LoP Guest Wrote:Wow, free shit, no money needed? Hell yeah, I'd be all over THAT, screw working to get money for stuff.
BTW, who's gonna pick up the tab for all this?
There's no "tab" because there's no money. I know it's hard to wrap our brainwashed minds around the concept but you might want to give it a try.
Tesla's free wireless energy transmitter would be self sustaining. free, safe energy for everyone forever.
“The first World System power plant can be in operation in nine months.”
– Nikola Tesla, 1904
'As Tesla experimented with a 1.5 megawatt system in 1899 at Colorado Springs, he was amazed to find that pulses of electricity he sent out passed across the entire globe and returned with “undiminished strength”. He said; “It was a result so unbelievable that the revelation at first almost stunned me.” [Compared with this ‘undiminished strength”, more than two-thirds of current-day electrical power disappears and is totally wasted, due to transmission losses and other factors between current-day power stations and the electricity consumer]
This verified the tremendous efficiency of his peculiar method of pumping current into a spherical ball to charge it up, before discharging it as a pulse of electrical energy: a ‘longitudinal’ acoustic type of compression wave, rather than an electromagnetic Hertzian type of transverse wave. It was therefore more akin to electrostatic discharge than wave mechanics."
http://green-changemakers.blogspot.com/2...eless.html
The initial cost is very low and would eventually cure practically any energy problem we have. Free energy means the prices on almost everything will drop precipitously. To the point where we could make nearly everything we need for our life free. This could end any need for war, free our people to pursue their dreams and realize their potential. Creativity would increase and soon it would become boundless. Most people would choose to work but you wouldn't need to. You could just go get your free stuff and be a lifeless drag on the rest of us if you wanted to but I think that you would choose to pursue your dreams like everyone else.
The Egyptians seemed to have tapped this free energy.
"I think our founders were right. Peace and commerce and friendship are much better than going to war." - Ron Paul on Foreign Affairs
|
|
|
|
LoP Guest lop guest User ID: 98922 07-25-2012 02:26 AM
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
Forbidden Truth Wrote:There's no "tab" because there's no money. I know it's hard to wrap our brainwashed minds around the concept but you might want to give it a try.
That sounds like theft, stealing, taking something without compensating those that did all the work to produce what you took.
Without money, you would still have to keep some sort of ledger, a balance sheet, so that nobody takes more than what they are worth, no more than what they themselves have produced and contributed. You can't TAKE more than what's being produced, than what's available.
So, what's to replace money? If I break my back toiling day and night growing a shit load of apples, you ain't gonna touch them until you break your back for me in exchange. Money, beans, gold, you must trade to me something I need or desire if you want any of my apples. That's why money works so well, you don't have to haul around a truck load of stuff I might be interested to trade apples for. Money is so much more convenient.
I'm no slave, my apples, my labor, my life, ain't free you must understand. I don't think anyone likes to work for free.
Oh, and this free energy idea is craziness. If energy were to be free, it would be the end of you all. Seriously, if energy was free, could you image the WMD some fool could build? Don't wish for that!
|
|
|
|
Forbidden Truth Registered User User ID: 91795 07-25-2012 03:25 AM
Posts: 387
|
RE: Who would live in moneyless collective village/city?
LoP Guest Wrote:Forbidden Truth Wrote:There's no "tab" because there's no money. I know it's hard to wrap our brainwashed minds around the concept but you might want to give it a try.
That sounds like theft, stealing, taking something without compensating those that did all the work to produce what you took.
Without money, you would still have to keep some sort of ledger, a balance sheet, so that nobody takes more than what they are worth, no more than what they themselves have produced and contributed. You can't TAKE more than what's being produced, than what's available.
So, what's to replace money? If I break my back toiling day and night growing a shit load of apples, you ain't gonna touch them until you break your back for me in exchange. Money, beans, gold, you must trade to me something I need or desire if you want any of my apples. That's why money works so well, you don't have to haul around a truck load of stuff I might be interested to trade apples for. Money is so much more convenient.
I'm no slave, my apples, my labor, my life, ain't free you must understand. I don't think anyone likes to work for free.
Oh, and this free energy idea is craziness. If energy were to be free, it would be the end of you all. Seriously, if energy was free, could you image the WMD some fool could build? Don't wish for that!
You can keep a ledger. But it would be kinda useless. You can keep a record of what you bring to the market...if you want. If you grow apples because that's what you love to do then that's what you do...grow apples. You can grow the best apples ever grown if that's your choice. See, there's no such thing as "money" anymore in this scenario. If you're a farmer the seed's, equipment fertilizer, etc.... is free. Everything is free. It's not theft if we all provide services that everyone needs and in return everything (within reason) is free for everyone. Free food, clothing, housing, energy (even without Tesla's free energy), water, entertainment....everything a person could need to live a fulfilling life would be free. Oh the rules and logistics would need to be worked out but we live with rules all of the time.
You deliver your apples but you get paid the same as everyone else. nothing, EXCEPT freedom from the slavery money represents. You see the banksters invented money to enslave you with it. They are unforgiving slave owners and they rule the world.
If you need food...go to the store and get what you need.
If you want a HD TV with surround sound go pick it up.
If the people who make the TV need something thry will do the same.
Can the system be abused? Yes. But why would someone hoard crap if it's free anyway?
Some would work at the job they want to work at. Most would not need to work 40 hours a week. Probably more like 20 - 30. Others might choose difficult or dangerous work. They could be compensated with a better car or a longer vacation or front row tickets or some other commodity. Nobody wants to be a sewer worker but someone's got to do it and so they should be compensated with perks. That can be worked out too. If you want to become a doctor or nurse or anthropologist you can choose your field and go to schools of higher and higher education for free because that's what teachers like to do...teach.
I imagine I'm just wasting my time here because the brainwashing is so deeply ingrained into our brains it would take generations to repair.
There's really no need for money. There's really no need to "get ahead" in this scenario.
And no, a terrorist wouldn't be able to create a wmd from Tesla's free energy device...ever.
"I think our founders were right. Peace and commerce and friendship are much better than going to war." - Ron Paul on Foreign Affairs
|
|
|
|
|