News

**Aqua**

Arch Phoenix Wrote:

Hello creatard, you have it ass backward, off course.

The earth wasnt made for us, we evolved on this world, thats why it fits us so well.

Evolution, its great, you adapt to your environment and use it! Who d have thought that !

Damn creationist idiot

the specific healing properties of fruits, nuts, spices, herbs and honey, provided by Nature's pharmacy.

**Wolf Pup**

There are billions and billions of other solar systems that are just right to support life also. The only differance is we came out as humans...the other billions may be smart fish....or maybe smart dinos...or who knows what else!
We evolved into what we are to adapt to the Earth and its stuff on it. Maybe another planet with the smart dinos have electric clouds filled with neutrinos that they eat because that is how they evolved and how they survive.

**Arch Phoenix** · (This post was last modified: 04-27-2012 04:28 PM by Arch Phoenix.)

*If there were no carbon,.....there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

But there is carbon , cause its an element. Btw, silicon based lifeforms can exist too.

*If there were no moon.....there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

False. It would be a little rough on the edges of the continents, but in the sea nothing changes

*Without the sun set in it's specific place...........there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

You know that the sun existed before life evolved , thats why we evolved to adapt to our sun.

*Without a specific portion of water on the earth.......there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

You mena the water that covers 70% of our planet and is one of the easiest chemical bindings?

*Without the Nitrogen Cycle......there would be no life on earth.

You have found out that nitrogen is an element that doesnt decay into another element. Congratulations.

So does Iron and gold and oxygen.

*Without the curved atmosphere protecting earth, that splits the sun’s spectral light.......there would be no life on earth.

A round planet has a curved atmosphere...wow what a bummer....

*Without the specific blend of elements in the atmosphere.......there would be no life on earth.

No. Life came from the water, and in the beginning there was no unbound oxygen in the atmosphere.
The atmosphere was created by life not the other way round.

*Without lightning......there would be no life on earth, as we know it[/color]....

Wrong. Thermal energy created the first proteins not lightning

*Without the color green in nature.........there would be no life on earth...because GREEN in Nature = OXYGEN...

You had physics? Light has a spectrum, green is a wavelength. And if you can count 1+1 you may notice that there are no wholes in the lightspectrum. What we see as green is green cause our brain interprets it like that

*Without the element of SALT.........there would be no life on earth.[/color]

Salt isnt an element, its an organic binding. There is more then NAcl, you may look at what a salt actually is

So if you were to remove JUST ONE of those above ^^^ that are significant necessary ELEMENTS of LIFE... from the machinations of earth's biosphere.......

yes, we evolved to need them., if we wouldnt have had them in the first place we wouldnt need it too.

there would be no life on earth....as we know it.
[/quote]

I have answered your dumb assertions. Cya creatard

**Arch Phoenix**

Womam Wrote:

Arch Phoenix Wrote:
Hello creatard, you have it ass backward, off course.

The earth wasnt made for us, we evolved on this world, thats why it fits us so well.

Evolution, its great, you adapt to your environment and use it! Who d have thought that !

Damn creationist idiot

the specific healing properties of fruits, nuts, spices, herbs and honey, provided by Nature's pharmacy.

You do realize that they dont heal you? They aid your own immune system to fight off whatever it is.

**Aqua** · (This post was last modified: 04-27-2012 04:46 PM by Aqua.)

Is AP from the back of the class of the short bused?

Quote:So if you were to remove JUST ONE of those above ^^^ that are significant necessary ELEMENTS of LIFE... from the machinations of earth's biosphere.......

yes, we evolved to need them.,

since you're in such an 'educating' mood, why don't you go ahead and explain that biological process to the class.

so how does a NON-intelligent biological organism become AWARE that it 'needs' something it's never ingested before....?

**Arch Phoenix**

Womam Wrote:

Is AP from the back of the class of the short bused?

Quote:So if you were to remove JUST ONE of those above ^^^ that are significant necessary ELEMENTS of LIFE... from the machinations of earth's biosphere.......

yes, we evolved to need them.,

since you're in such an 'educating' mood, why don't you go ahead and explain that biological process to the class.

so how does a NON-intelligent biological organism become AWARE that it 'needs' something it's never ingested before....?

abiogenesis.

In such a reducing atmosphere, electrical activity can catalyze the creation of certain basic small molecules (monomers) of life, such as amino acids. This was demonstrated in the Miller–Urey experiment by Stanley L. Miller and Harold C. Urey in 1953.
Phospholipids (of an appropriate length) can form lipid bilayers, a basic component of the cell membrane.
A fundamental question is about the nature of the first self-replicating molecule. Since replication is accomplished in modern cells through the cooperative action of proteins and nucleic acids, the major schools of thought about how the process originated can be broadly classified as "proteins first" and "nucleic acids first".
The principal thrust of the "nucleic acids first" argument is as follows:

The polymerization of nucleotides into random RNA molecules might have resulted in self-replicating ribozymes (RNA world hypothesis)
Selection pressures for catalytic efficiency and diversity might have resulted in ribozymes which catalyse peptidyl transfer (hence formation of small proteins), since oligopeptides complex with RNA to form better catalysts. The first ribosome might have been created by such a process, resulting in more prevalent protein synthesis.
Synthesized proteins might then outcompete ribozymes in catalytic ability, and therefore become the dominant biopolymer, relegating nucleic acids to their modern use, predominantly as a carrier of genomic information.

**Aqua** · (This post was last modified: 04-27-2012 05:27 PM by Aqua.)

Quote:The polymerization of nucleotides into random RNA molecules might have resulted in self-replicating ribozymes (RNA world hypothesis)
Selection pressures for catalytic efficiency and diversity might have resulted in ribozymes which catalyse peptidyl transfer (hence formation of small proteins), since oligopeptides complex with RNA to form better catalysts. The first ribosome might have been created by such a process, resulting in more prevalent protein synthesis.
Synthesized proteins might then outcompete ribozymes in catalytic ability, and therefore become the dominant biopolymer, relegating nucleic acids to their modern use, predominantly as a carrier of genomic information.

Now I know why you belong in the back of the class of the short bussed.

rofl2

You present THAT swiss cheese as your evidence?! Even though it's clearly shot thru with SO MANY 'MIGHT HAVE' EMPTY HOLES in it!

lol

which is exactly why people refer to atheistic Darwinians as a religion of FAITH.....even though you criticize Christians of the same.

**entropy**

**Aqua**

WomamWrote:

So if you were to remove JUST ONE of those above ^^^ that are significant necessary ELEMENTS of LIFE... from the machinations of earth's biosphere.......

there would be no life on earth....as we know it.

ArchPhoenixWrote:

I have answered your dumb assertions. Cya creatard.

the equivalent of scratching a line in the dirt with your hoof, does not equal 'answering' my questions.

**Aqua**

More info on other specifics required for what is considered a 'habitable' zone, where life on a planet could exist...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200...124831.htm

**Currahee**

Womam Wrote:

to appear.........and evolve.

Science Channel just made claims that our solar system has just the right amount of planets, that are in just the right place to not only protect earth, but they also influence the perfectly spaced dance around the sun....with our earth being in just the right place in distance from the sun, to keep from completely freezing, or burning up.

To understand all the integral and important STEPS that are in just the right place in the orchestrated dance that were REQUIRED to create and promote life on our planet...AS WE KNOW IT.

consider this....

*If there were no carbon,.....there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

*If there were no moon.....there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

*Without the sun set in it's specific place...........there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

*Without a specific portion of water on the earth.......there would be no life on earth, as we know it.

*Without the Nitrogen Cycle......there would be no life on earth.

*Without the curved atmosphere protecting earth, that splits the sun’s spectral light.......there would be no life on earth.

*Without the specific blend of elements in the atmosphere.......there would be no life on earth.

*Without lightning......there would be no life on earth, as we know it....

*Without the color green in nature.........there would be no life on earth...because GREEN in Nature = OXYGEN...

*Without the element of SALT.........there would be no life on earth.

So if you were to remove JUST ONE of those above ^^^ that are significant necessary ELEMENTS of LIFE... from the machinations of earth's biosphere.......

there would be no life on earth....as we know it.

I just need to nitpick because I'm nerdy like that ...

The color green in plants comes from chlorophyll which is responsible for photosynthesis. It absorbs light except for the green wavelength which is why it reflects a green light. It turns that light into complex sugars. Although the same green parts of plants are what respire (breath) the color green has little to do with it.

Salt is not an element, it's actually composed of two elements sodium (which is required for all animals) and chloride.

Peace

**Michael Alan Keith**

encephaloid Wrote:

Do all the women you chat with on facebook wear paper bags over their heads?

Anon

**Aqua** · (This post was last modified: 04-27-2012 06:09 PM by Aqua.)

Currahee Wrote:

Womam Wrote:
*Without the color green in nature.........there would be no life on earth...because GREEN in Nature = OXYGEN...

there would be no life on earth....as we know it.

I just need to nitpick because I'm nerdy like that ...

The color green in plants comes from chlorophyll which is responsible for photosynthesis. It absorbs light except for the green wavelength which is why it reflects a green light.

It turns that light into complex sugars. Although the same green parts of plants are what respire (breath) the color green has little to do with it.

that truly was informative, yet does not negate my previous statement below that is referring to the OXYGEN PROVIDED BY TREES, PLANTS AND ALGAE.....which our HUMAN EYES SEE AS BEING GREEN.

WomamWrote:

*Without the color green in nature.........there would be no life on earth...because GREEN in Nature = OXYGEN

**Arch Phoenix**

Womam Wrote:

Currahee Wrote:
Womam Wrote:
*Without the color green in nature.........there would be no life on earth...because GREEN in Nature = OXYGEN...

there would be no life on earth....as we know it.

I just need to nitpick because I'm nerdy like that ...

The color green in plants comes from chlorophyll which is responsible for photosynthesis. It absorbs light except for the green wavelength which is why it reflects a green light.

It turns that light into complex sugars. Although the same green parts of plants are what respire (breath) the color green has little to do with it.

that truly was informative, yet does not negate my previous statement below that is referring to the OXYGEN PROVIDED BY TREES, PLANTS AND ALGAE.....which our HUMAN EYES SEE AS BEING GREEN.

WomamWrote:
*Without the color green in nature.........there would be no life on earth...because GREEN in Nature = OXYGEN

Oxygen has no colour creatard. Or do you see green everywhere?

The green color of plants is caused by the material[chloroplasts] they consists off

You really have no basic understanding of physics or anything else,but you have to talk shit anyway.

Green is common in nature, as many green plants use a complex chemical known as chlorophyll during photosynthesis.[17] Chlorophyll does not absorb green light because it first arose in organisms living in oceans where purple halobacteria were already exploiting photosynthesis. Their purple color arose because they extracted energy in the green portion of the spectrum using bacteriorhodopsin. The new organisms that then later came to dominate the extraction of light were selected to exploit those portions of the spectrum not used by the halobacteria.[31]

Animals typically use the color green as camouflage, blending in with the chlorophyll green of the surrounding environment.[17] Green animals include, especially, amphibians, reptiles, and some fish, birds and insects. Most fish, reptiles, amphibians, and birds appear green because of a reflection of blue light coming through an over-layer of yellow pigment. Perception of color can also be affected by the surrounding environment. For example, broadleaf forests typically have a yellow-green light about them as the trees filter the light. Turacoverdin is one chemical which can cause a green hue in birds, especially.[17] Invertebrates such as insects or mollusks often display green colors because of porphyrin pigments, sometimes caused by diet. This can causes their feces to look green as well. Other chemicals which generally contribute to greenness among organisms are flavins (lychochromes) and hemanovadin.[17] Humans have imitated this by wearing green clothing as a camouflage in military and other fields. Substances that may impart a greenish hue to one's skin include biliverdin, the green pigment in bile, and ceruloplasmin, a protein that carries copper ions in chelation

now go back to your bible

**Aqua** · (This post was last modified: 04-27-2012 06:45 PM by Aqua.)

dear god you can't even correctly suss what this equation is referring to which means you have a major malfunction in your brain, which leads me to find it unnecessary to read the rest of any of your illogical conclusions that your mind spews in response to my logical posts.

WomamWrote:

*Without the color green in nature.........there would be no life on earth...because GREEN in Nature = OXYGEN

ArchPhoenixWrote:

Oxygen has no colour creatard. Or do you see green everywhere?

ffs...

.... you're an ignorant idiot.